Literature DB >> 30536724

Chilling and forcing temperatures interact to predict the onset of wood formation in Northern Hemisphere conifers.

Nicolas Delpierre1, Ségolène Lireux1, Florian Hartig2, Jesus Julio Camarero3, Alissar Cheaib1,4, Katarina Čufar5, Henri Cuny6, Annie Deslauriers7, Patrick Fonti8, Jožica Gričar9, Jian-Guo Huang10, Cornelia Krause7, Guohua Liu1,11, Martin de Luis12, Harri Mäkinen13, Edurne Martinez Del Castillo12, Hubert Morin7, Pekka Nöjd13, Walter Oberhuber14, Peter Prislan9, Sergio Rossi7,10, Seyedeh Masoumeh Saderi15, Vaclav Treml16, Hanus Vavrick17, Cyrille B K Rathgeber15.   

Abstract

The phenology of wood formation is a critical process to consider for predicting how trees from the temperate and boreal zones may react to climate change. Compared to leaf phenology, however, the determinism of wood phenology is still poorly known. Here, we compared for the first time three alternative ecophysiological model classes (threshold models, heat-sum models and chilling-influenced heat-sum models) and an empirical model in their ability to predict the starting date of xylem cell enlargement in spring, for four major Northern Hemisphere conifers (Larix decidua, Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Picea mariana). We fitted models with Bayesian inference to wood phenological data collected for 220 site-years over Europe and Canada. The chilling-influenced heat-sum model received most support for all the four studied species, predicting validation data with a 7.7-day error, which is within one day of the observed data resolution. We conclude that both chilling and forcing temperatures determine the onset of wood formation in Northern Hemisphere conifers. Importantly, the chilling-influenced heat-sum model showed virtually no spatial bias whichever the species, despite the large environmental gradients considered. This suggests that the spring onset of wood formation is far less affected by local adaptation than by environmentally driven plasticity. In a context of climate change, we therefore expect rising winter-spring temperature to exert ambivalent effects on the spring onset of wood formation, tending to hasten it through the accumulation of forcing temperature, but imposing a higher forcing temperature requirement through the lower accumulation of chilling.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cambium; chilling temperatures; conifers; forcing temperatures; phenological models; wood phenology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30536724     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  9 in total

1.  Reply to Elmendorf and Ettinger: Photoperiod plays a dominant and irreplaceable role in triggering secondary growth resumption.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Huang; Filipe Campelo; Qianqian Ma; Yaling Zhang; Yves Bergeron; Annie Deslauriers; Patrick Fonti; Eryuan Liang; Harri Mäkinen; Walter Oberhuber; Cyrille B K Rathgeber; Roberto Tognetti; Václav Treml; Bao Yang; Lihong Zhai; Jiao-Lin Zhang; Serena Antonucci; J Julio Camarero; Katarina Čufar; Henri E Cuny; Martin De Luis; Alessio Giovannelli; Jožica Gričar; Andreas Gruber; Vladimír Gryc; Aylin Güney; Xiali Guo; Wei Huang; Tuula Jyske; Jakub Kašpar; Gregory King; Cornelia Krause; Audrey Lemay; Feng Liu; Fabio Lombardi; Edurne Martinez Del Castillo; Hubert Morin; Cristina Nabais; Pekka Nöjd; Richard L Peters; Peter Prislan; Antonio Saracino; Irene Swidrak; Hanuš Vavrčík; Joana Vieira; Biyun Yu; Shaokang Zhang; Qiao Zeng; Emanuele Ziaco; Sergio Rossi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is photoperiod a dominant driver of secondary growth resumption?

Authors:  Sarah C Elmendorf; Ailene K Ettinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Seasonal patterns of increases in stem girth, vessel development, and hydraulic function in deciduous tree species.

Authors:  Jessica Valdovinos-Ayala; Catherine Robles; Jaycie C Fickle; Gonzalo Pérez-de-Lis; R Brandon Pratt; Anna L Jacobsen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.040

4.  Determinants of legacy effects in pine trees - implications from an irrigation-stop experiment.

Authors:  Roman Zweifel; Sophia Etzold; Frank Sterck; Arthur Gessler; Tommaso Anfodillo; Maurizio Mencuccini; Georg von Arx; Martina Lazzarin; Matthias Haeni; Linda Feichtinger; Katrin Meusburger; Simon Knuesel; Lorenz Walthert; Yann Salmon; Arun K Bose; Leonie Schoenbeck; Christian Hug; Nicolas De Girardi; Arnaud Giuggiola; Marcus Schaub; Andreas Rigling
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Forward Modeling Reveals Multidecadal Trends in Cambial Kinetics and Phenology at Treeline.

Authors:  Jan Tumajer; Jakub Kašpar; Hana Kuželová; Vladimir V Shishov; Ivan I Tychkov; Margarita I Popkova; Eugene A Vaganov; Václav Treml
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Wood Formation Modeling - A Research Review and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Annemarie H Eckes-Shephard; Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist; David M Drew; Cyrille B K Rathgeber; Andrew D Friend
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Inter-annual and inter-species tree growth explained by phenology of xylogenesis.

Authors:  Yizhao Chen; Tim Rademacher; Patrick Fonti; Annemarie H Eckes-Shephard; James M LeMoine; Marina V Fonti; Andrew D Richardson; Andrew D Friend
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 10.323

8.  Drought impacts on tree carbon sequestration and water use - evidence from intra-annual tree-ring characteristics.

Authors:  Elisabet Martínez-Sancho; Kerstin Treydte; Marco M Lehmann; Andreas Rigling; Patrick Fonti
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 10.323

9.  Winter-spring temperature pattern is closely related to the onset of cambial reactivation in stems of the evergreen conifer Chamaecyparis pisifera.

Authors:  Md Hasnat Rahman; Kayo Kudo; Yusuke Yamagishi; Yusuke Nakamura; Satoshi Nakaba; Shahanara Begum; Widyanto Dwi Nugroho; Izumi Arakawa; Peter Kitin; Ryo Funada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.