Literature DB >> 30536545

Determinants for Meaningful Clinical Improvement of Pain and Health-Related Quality of Life After Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Intractable Pain.

Wuilker Knoner Campos1,2,3,4, Marcelo Neves Linhares1,2,3,4,5, Jamir Sarda6, Adair Roberto Soares Santos7, Júlio Licinio8, João Quevedo9, Kátia Lin4,10, Roger Walz4,10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies demonstrated significant improvement in mean pain scores and quality of life (QOL) scales in patients with chronic pain who underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS). However, the number of individuals who experience relevant improvements in QOL, termed the meaningful clinical improvement (MCI), is not known. The present study investigated changes in pain measurements based on MCI after SCS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with chronic intractable pain completed scales of pain (visual analogue scale [VAS]), QOL (SF-36), and psychological dimensions during a 22-month follow-up period (mean). Patient-centered MCI of the VAS and SF-36 domain scores were determined based on the MacNab criteria of surgical global effectiveness. Independent presurgical predictors for MCI in the VAS and SF-36 domains were analyzed using multiple binary logistic regression.
RESULTS: There was significant improvement of pain and QOL after the SCS (p < 0.00001). Twenty-three patients (67.6%) reached an MCI of pain, and 16 (47.7%)-23 (67.7%) reported an MCI of QOL. Predictors of MCI included ≥80% paresthesia coverage of the painful area, lower levels of anxiety and catastrophizing symptoms, shorter pain duration, female gender and no use of opioids before surgery. MCI of pain and QOL was observed in 50%-70% of patients with chronic pain after SCS.
CONCLUSIONS: The identification of determinants for MCI is a challenge to improve the accuracy of prognostic models in SCS for patients with chronic pain. Our results, if confirmed in other populations with a larger sample size, have implications for patients with chronic pain who are candidates for SCS treatment.
© 2018 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catastrophizing; meaningful clinical improvement; minimal clinically important difference; neuromodulation; pain treatment; psychological scales; quality of life; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30536545     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  5 in total

1.  Short- and long-term effects of conventional spinal cord stimulation on chronic pain and health perceptions: A longitudinal controlled trial.

Authors:  Silviu Brill; Ruth Defrin; Itay Goor Aryeh; Adva Meseritz Zusman; Yael Benyamini
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.651

2.  Electrochemical Skin Conductance Alterations during Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Lisa Goudman; Nieke Vets; Julie Jansen; Ann De Smedt; Maxime Billot; Philippe Rigoard; Ann Cordenier; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Aldo Scafoglieri; Maarten Moens
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Predictors of Pain Recurrence After Lumbar Facet Joint Injections.

Authors:  Wuilker Knoner Campos; Marcelo Neves Linhares; Jamir Sarda; Adair Roberto Soares Santos; Kátia Lin; Alexandra Latini; Roger Walz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lisa Goudman; Julie Jansen; Nieke Vets; Ann De Smedt; Maarten Moens
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 5.  Adrenomedullin: an important participant in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Feng-Jiao Li; Si-Ru Zheng; Dong-Mei Wang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.135

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.