Literature DB >> 30536129

Impact of Long-Course Neoadjuvant Radiation on Postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Weipeng Sun1,2, Ruoxu Dou3,4, Jiaohua Chen5, Sicong Lai1,2, Chi Zhang6, Lei Ruan1,2, Liang Kang1,2, Yanhong Deng2,7, Ping Lan1,2, Lei Wang8,9, Jianping Wang10,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiation is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer, with proven benefit in local control but not in disease-free survival. However, the impact of long-course radiation on postoperative bowel function and quality of life (QOL) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of long-course neoadjuvant radiation on bowel function and QOL, and to identify risk factors for severe bowel dysfunction.
METHODS: Patients who underwent long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or chemotherapy (nCT) followed by radical low anterior resection for locally advanced rectal cancer were recruited from the FOWARC randomized controlled trial. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) C30/CR29 questionnaires were used to assess bowel function and QOL, respectively.
RESULTS: Overall, 220 patients responded after a median follow-up of 40.2 months, of whom 119 (54.1%) reported major LARS, 74 (33.6%) reported minor LARS, and 27 (12.3%) reported no LARS. Compared with the nCT group, the nCRT group reported more major LARS (64.4% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.001) and worse QOL. Long-course neoadjuvant radiation (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.24-3.91; p = 0.007), height of anastomosis (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.88; p < 0.001), and diverting ileostomy (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.27-5.30; p = 0.009) were independent risk factors for major LARS.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-course neoadjuvant radiation, along with low anastomosis, are likely independent risk factors for postoperative bowel function and QOL. Our findings might have implications for alleviating LARS and improving QOL by informing selection of neoadjuvant treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30536129     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-07096-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

Review 1.  The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui Sun; Ziyi Dai; Yin Zhang; Junyang Lu; Yuelun Zhang; Yi Xiao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for cT3N0 rectal cancer: any benefit over upfront surgery? A propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Luca Sorrentino; Marcello Guaglio; Luigi Battaglia; Giuliano Bonfanti; Marco Vitellaro; Alessandro Cesa Bianchi; Massimo Milione; Filiberto Belli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Fecal and urinary incontinence are major problems associated with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Leif Schiffmann; Karel Kostev; Matthias Kalder
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Impact of a defunctioning ileostomy and time to stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Hompes; J A Cornish; I Vogel; N Reeves; P J Tanis; W A Bemelman; J Torkington
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Robotic surgery contributes to the preservation of bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision: comparisons with transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Takuya Miura; Yoshiyuki Sakamoto; Hajime Morohashi; Akiko Suto; Shunsuke Kubota; Aika Ichisawa; Daisuke Kuwata; Takahiro Yamada; Hiroaki Tamba; Shuntaro Matsumoto; Kenichi Hakamada
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.030

6.  Impact of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Shi-Wen Mei; Zheng Liu; Fang-Ze Wei; Jia-Nan Chen; Zhi-Jie Wang; Hai-Yu Shen; Juan Li; Fu-Qiang Zhao; Wei Pei; Zheng Wang; Xi-Shan Wang; Qian Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Effect of lateral lymph node dissection on the quality of life and genitourinary function after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryun Kyong Ha; Boram Park; Sung Chan Park; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 1.859

8.  A nomogram to predict risk factors of frequent defecation early after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jiaxin Deng; Mingli Su; Jiancong Hu; Dezheng Lin; Juan Li; Wei Liu; Jiawei Zhang; Qinghua Zhong; Xuefeng Guo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10

9.  Comparison of patient-reported quality of life and functional outcomes following laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryun Kyong Ha; Sung Chan Park; Boram Park; Sung Sil Park; Dae Kyung Sohn; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  A randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of pre- and post-surgical pelvic floor physiotherapy for bowel symptoms, pelvic floor function, and quality of life of patients with rectal cancer: CARRET protocol.

Authors:  Cinara Sacomori; Luz Alejandra Lorca; Mónica Martinez-Mardones; Roberto Ignacio Salas-Ocaranza; Guillermo Patricio Reyes-Reyes; Marta Natalia Pizarro-Hinojosa; Jorge Plasser-Troncoso
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.