Literature DB >> 3053583

Impact of PEEP on lung mechanics and work of breathing in severe airflow obstruction.

T C Smith1, J J Marini.   

Abstract

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has generally been withheld from the treatment of patients with chronic airflow obstruction (CAO), in view of the risk of hyperinflation and lack of documented benefit. We studied 10 mechanically ventilated patients with exacerbated CAO and air trapping to determine the impact of PEEP on lung mechanics, alveolar pressure, and the work of breathing. PEEP levels of 5 and 10 cmH2O were applied to patients whose end-expiratory alveolar pressures were documented to be positive when breathing against ambient pressure (the auto-PEEP effect). All patients were studied under two conditions: every breath machine assisted (AMV) and every breath machine controlled (paralyzed, CMV). PEEP improved expiratory resistance without substantially increasing peak static pressure. Inspiratory resistance remained unchanged. The difference between the end-expiratory values of alveolar and central airway pressure narrowed as PEEP increased. Adding PEEP improved the effective triggering sensitivity of the ventilator, diminished ventilatory drive, and reduced the mechanical work of breathing during the machine-assisted ventilatory cycle. Our results indicate that low levels of PEEP may improve lung mechanics and reduce the effort required of mechanically ventilated patients with severe airflow obstruction, without substantially increasing the hazards of hyperinflation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3053583     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1988.65.4.1488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  64 in total

1.  Work of breathing-tidal volume relationship: analysis on an in vitro model and clinical implications.

Authors:  G Natalini; D M Tuzzo; G Comunale; F A Rasulo; G Amicucci; A Candiani
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Breathing pattern analysis.

Authors:  M J Tobin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a new look at management.

Authors:  D P Southall; M P Samuels
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Measuring the breathing workload in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  G Annat; J P Viale
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J C Chevrolet
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

6.  Positive end-expiratory pressure and pressure support in peripheral airways obstruction : work of breathing in intubated children.

Authors:  Alan S Graham; Girish Chandrashekharaiah; Agop Citak; Randall C Wetzel; Christopher J L Newth
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Non-invasive modalities of positive pressure ventilation improve the outcome of acute exacerbations in COLD patients.

Authors:  M Vitacca; F Rubini; K Foglio; S Scalvini; S Nava; N Ambrosino
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Pressure support ventilation via face mask in acute respiratory failure in hypercapnic COPD patients.

Authors:  R Fernandez; L Blanch; J Valles; F Baigorri; A Artigas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Acute exacerbations and respiratory failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Neil MacIntyre; Yuh Chin Huang
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

Review 10.  State of the evidence: mechanical ventilation with PEEP in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Jonathan Wiesen; Moshe Ornstein; Adriano R Tonelli; Venu Menon; Rendell W Ashton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.