Literature DB >> 30535446

The AIB1siRNA-loaded hyaluronic acid-assembled PEI/heparin/Ca2+ nanocomplex as a novel therapeutic strategy in lung cancer treatment.

Ying Hao1, Yongsheng Gao2, Yedan Wu3, Changshan An3.   

Abstract

In the present study, AIB1siRpan> class="Chemical">NA‑loaded polyethyleneimine (PEI)/heparin/Ca2+ nanoparticles (NPs) were successfully prepared and evaluated for their efficacy in lung cancer cells. The results demonstrated that the PEI and heparin complex reduced the toxic effect in cancer cells while maintaining its transfection efficiency. A nanosized particle of ~25 nm was formulated and siRNA was demonstrated to possess excellent binding efficiency in the particles. Confocal microscopy revealed that fluorescein‑labeled (FAM)‑small interfering (si)RNA dissociated from the HAPEI/heparin/Ca2+/siRNA (CPH‑siH) NPs and exhibited maximum fluorescence in the cytoplasm, which was important in elucidating its post‑transcriptional activity. CPH‑siH NPs exhibited a typical concentration‑dependent toxicity in cancer cells. Blank PEI/heparin/Ca2+ did not induce any toxicity in cancer cells, indicating its safety and lack of side effects. CPH‑siH (100 nm) induced the maximum apoptosis of cancer cells with nearly ~35% of cells in the early and late apoptosis stages. The expression of the nuclear receptor coactivator 3 (NCOA3, also known as AIB1) protein was knocked down in a concentration‑dependent manner, demonstrating the potent activity of AIB1siRNA in cancer cells. Together, these results indicated that HAPEI/heparin/Ca2+ NPs may be a promising carrier for the anticancer activity of AIB1siRNA in lung cancer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30535446      PMCID: PMC6317651          DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.4014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Med        ISSN: 1107-3756            Impact factor:   4.101


Introduction

Lung cancer is onpan>e of the leading causes of pan> class="Disease">cancer-related death in both men and women, worldwide (1). Histologically, two different types of lung cancer exist, which are classified based on their microscopic appearance (2). Among these two types, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85-90% of lung cancers (3). Most patients diagnosed with NSCLC have advanced-stage disease and have a mean 5-year survival of 17.4% (4). Various strategies are currently used to treat NSCLC, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, and monoclonal antibodies; however, there is no single therapy that is reliable and successful (5,6). Gene therapy is emerging as an alternative to conventional therapy, which has beenpan> associated with adverse effects during pan> class="Disease">cancer treatment (7). Gene therapy involves the insertion of genetic material into cancer cells, which modifies gene expression during cancer management (8,9). In the present study, the oncogene nuclear receptor coactivator 3 (NCOA3, also known as AIB1) was selected as a target. AIB1 is a member of the p160 steroid receptor coactivator family (10). It is widely expressed in many types of cancer, including high expression in lung cancer cells, and it has been reported that the expression levels of AIB1 are directly associated with patient survival (11). AIB1 is strongly associated with apoptosis, tumorigenesis, and cancer metastasis (12). Therefore, it was hypothesized that knockdown of AIB1 may result in increased therapeutic efficacy in lung cancers. One of the important aspects of gene therapy is the efficient delivery of the gene to the target cells without any side effects to major organs. Ideally, the gene delivery system should be target-specific, nontoxic, biocompatible, and stable during storage conditions (13,14). Nonpan>-viral pan> class="Chemical">polymer carriers are considered to be more beneficial than viral gene carriers because of the reduced risk of an immune response. Polyethyleneimine (PEI) is one of the most used and tested cationic carriers for gene delivery (15). PEI is known to possess high transfection efficiency both in vitro and in vivo (16). However, branched PEI has been associated with a high risk of toxicity compared with viral vectors (17). To reduce the toxicity of PEI, while at the same time maintaining its transfection efficiency, heparin is used, which is a negatively charged anticoagulation agent (18). Heparin is biocompatible and widely used in clinical studies. Furthermore, the high negative charge of heparin allows a strong physical interaction with its cationic counterparts (19). Several studies of the heparin and protamine sulphate complex have reported that it is associated with significantly increased intracellular delivery (20,21). In the present study, a nanocomplex based on PEI/heparin in the presence of Ca2+ ions was produced to form intact particles. To protect the siRNA in the systemic circulation, a protective layer around the PEI/heparin/Ca2+ particles was also assembled. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural polysaccharide, which is present in abundance in the extracellular matrix and synovial fluids of the body. The negatively charged HA forms a layer around the positively charged PEI/heparin/Ca2+ particles to maximize its stability. In addition, HA acts as a targeting agent by forming a receptor complex with CD44 receptors in cancer cells (22). The major objective of the present study was to deliver AIB1 small interfering (si)Rpan> class="Chemical">NA into lung cancer cells. For this purpose, siRNA was loaded in PEI/heparin/Ca2+ nanoparticles (NPs), then coated with HA as a protective layer. The efficiency of the HA-PEI/heparin/Ca2+/siRNA (CPH-siH) was then evaluated using cell viability, cell apoptosis, and western blot protein expression analyses.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Heparin sodium, pan> class="Chemical">calcium chloride, and HA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Branched PEI (25 kDa) was also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA). The sequences of siAIB1 were 5′-r(GGU GAA UCG AGA CGG AAA C)dTT-3′ and 5′-r(GUU UCC GUC UCG AUU CAC C)dTTT-3′. All other chemicals were of reagent grade.

Preparation of HA-assembled AIB1siRNA-loaded PEI/heparin/Ca2+ NPs

A synthetic route was used to prepare HA-pan> class="Chemical">PEI/heparin/Ca2/siRNA (CPH-siH). A total of 2 ml of CaCl2 solution (22 mg/ml), 1 ml of PEI (32 mg/ml), and 0.5 ml of heparin (32 mg/ml) was mixed together and stirred for 45 min at 800 rpm/min. The volume was increased to 50 ml and further stirred for 20 h. At the end of this period, a white-colored precipitate was formed, which was collected by centrifuging at 3,000 × g for 15 min. The particle was washed three times until all the unreacted initial components were removed. The resulting PEI/heparin/Ca2+ was dispersed in 1 ml of saline, and siRNA was added and further incubated for 12 h at 4°C. The resulting PEI/heparin/Ca2/siRNA was collected by centrifugation at 1,400 × g for 5 min. HA solution at a weight ratio of 5:1 (siRNA complex:HA) was added and gently stirred for 30 min. Finally, NPs were centrifuged at 250 × g for 10 min and the pellet was resuspended in ultrapure water and stored at 4-8°C.

Gel retardation assay

The loading of siRNA into particles was evaluated by pan> class="Chemical">agarose gel electrophoresis. The CPH-siH and siRNA were mixed in different NP ratios, and the preparation was analyzed as previously mentioned. A 1% agarose gel was prepared and prestained with 0.5 mg/ml of ethidium bromide. The agarose gel was loaded with different samples and run at 100 V in Tris-acetate buffer (0.001 M EDTA). The bands formed in the gel were evaluated using an UltraLum Electronic UV Transilluminator (300 nm) with a Cohu High Performance Monochrome CCD Camera (Rose Scientific, Edmonton, Canada).

Particle size and surface charge analysis

The particle size was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer ZS (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) at 25°C. The zeta potential was measured using electrophoretic cells. The samples were appropriately diluted, and the experin class="Species">ments were conpan>ducted in triplicate.

Morphology

The morphology of the particles was visualized by transmission electron microscopy (SM-2000EX; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleratinpan>g voltage of 120 kV. The particles were suitably diluted anpan>d placed inpan> a pan> class="Chemical">copper grid and stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid as a negative stain. The grid was air dried and then visualized.

Cellular distribution

The cellular distribution of CPH-siH in pan> class="Disease">A549 cancer cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) was evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Briefly, 2×105 cells were seeded into 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The medium was removed the next day and the cells were treated with CPH-siH. For this purpose, fluorescein-labeled (FAM)-siRNA was used and loaded in the CPH-siH. After 2 h of incubation, the cells were carefully washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The cells were then washed again and stained with DAPI stain for 10 min. The cells were washed three times with PBS to remove all of the unbound DAPI, and observed (magnification, ×40) using CLSM with 4 fields of view for each sample.

Cell viability assay

The effect of CPH-siH onpan> the viability of pan> class="Disease">A549 lung cancer cells was evaluated using the MTT assay. Briefly, 1×104 cells were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The medium was removed the next day and treated with different concentrations of CPH-siH and further incubated for 24 h. As a control, cells were incubated with blank NPs in parallel. Following the 24 h incubation, the medium was carefully removed and the cells were washed twice with PBS. The cells were then treated with 100 µl MTT solution (1.25 mg/ml) and incubated for 4 h, followed by the addition of 100 µl of dimethyl sulfoxide. After 15 min, the cells were shaken in a shaker, and the absorbance was measured using a microplate reader at 570 nm.

Apoptosis assay

To evaluate the mechanism of cell death, anpan> apoptosis assay was performed using pan> class="Gene">Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) staining and flow cytometry. Briefly, 2×105 cells were seeded into 12-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The medium was removed the next day and treated with different concentrations of CPH-siH for 24 h. The next day, the medium was carefully removed and the cells were detached using a cell scraper (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA). The cells were then centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended in 100 µl PBS and stained with 5 µl Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate and 5 µl PI for 15 min. The volume was made up to 1,000 µl and the cells were analyzed using a flow cytometer (BD FACS; BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (version 8.6.6; Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).

Western blot analysis

The effect of the AIB1siRpan> class="Chemical">NA was examined by western blot analysis. Briefly, 3×105 cells were seeded into 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The medium was removed the next day and treated with different concentrations of CPH-siH for 24 h. Then, the medium was carefully removed and the cells were detached using a scraper. The cells were lysed using a lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) and centrifuged at 3,500 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and its protein concentration was determined using Bradford assay protocol. The sample was solubilized with Laemmli buffer, and the proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by transferring to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Pall Life Sciences, Port Washington, NY, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk at 24°C for 1 h and incubated with mouse primary antibodies targeting AIB1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA; MA5-15898; 1:1,000), Bcl-2 (SC-7382; 1:1,000), or GAPDH (SC-25778; 1:2,000; both Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) overnight at 4°C. The next day, the membranes were washed three times with Tris-buffered saline/0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated mouse secondary antibodies (7076; 1:3,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were washed again with TBST and the bands were visualized with chemiluminescence detection reagent (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s adjustn class="Species">ment for pairwise comparisons. GraphPad Prism, version 17.0 (GraphPad Software, Inpan>c., La Jolla, CA, USA) was for statistical anpan>alysis. Data are presented as the meanpan> ± stanpan>dard deviation. P<0.05 was considered to inpan>dicate a statistically significanpan>t difference.

Results and discussion

Gene therapy is emerging as an alternative to conventional therapy for cancer, due to its ability to modify genpan>e expressionpan> during pan> class="Disease">cancer treatment. In this regard, the oncogene AIB1, which is a member of the p160 steroid receptor coactivator family, was selected as a target in the present study. It was hypothesized that knockdown of the AIB1 gene would result in increased therapeutic efficacy in lung cancer cells. In the present study, a nanocomplex based on PEI/heparin was produced in the presence of Ca2+ ions to form intact particles, and to protect the siRNA in the systemic circulation a further protective layer around the PEI/heparin/Ca2+ particles was assembled with HA (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Schematic presentation of the siRNA-loaded PEI/Heparin/Ca2+-HA nanoparticle preparation. The electrostatically assembled PEI/Heparin/Ca2+ was coated with HA as a protective cover. siRNA, small interfering RNA; PEI, polyethyleneimine; HA, hyaluronic acid.

Binding efficiency of AIB1siRNA to CPH-siH NPs

The binding efficiency of siRNA to the pan> class="Chemical">CPH-siH was evaluated by gel electrophoresis using 2% agarose gels. The ratio of siRNA to CPH-siH was varied from nitrogen/phosphate (N/P) ratios of 1-5. As illustrated in Fig. 2, a marked reduction in the mobility of siRNA was observed with an increase in the N/P ratio; the siRNA band was retained completely when the N/P ratio was 5, indicating its strong binding to the CPH-siH nanoparticles.
Figure 2

Binding efficiency of siRNA with PEI/Heparin/Ca2+-HA, as determined by gel electrophoresis. Various N/P ratios of siRNA to PEI/Heparin/Ca2+-HA were tested. siRNA, small interfering RNA; PEI, polyethyleneimine; HA, hyaluronic acid; N/P, nitrogen/phosphate.

Particle characteristics of CPH-siH NPs

The physicochemical properties of the carrier system affect its fate and efficiency in cancer manpan>agepan> class="Species">ment. The mean particle size of PEI/heparin/Ca2+siRNA particles was ~20 nm with a uniform distribution pattern (Fig. 3A). The particle size slightly increased to ~28 nm following coating with HA, indicating that a thin layer of polymer was assembled around the PEI/heparin/Ca2+ particles. The HA assembly was further confirmed by the charge reversal pattern. The surface charge of PEI/heparin/Ca2+ particles was +22.5±1.26 mV, while it reversed to −18.3±1.42 mV after coating with HA, indicating successful coating. Overall, NPs are expected to increase the delivery of siRNA to the targeted tissues, which may increase the therapeutic efficacy in cancer. The morphology of CPH-siH was determined by TEM (Fig. 3B). Consistent with the DLS analysis, spherically-shaped nanosized particles were distributed evenly on the copper grid. The nanosized particles coupled with their spherical morphology probably increased the success of the formulation methodology.
Figure 3

Particle characteristics. (A) Particle size analysis using dynamic light scattering. (B) Particle morphology analysis by transmission electron microscopy.

Intracellular distribution of CPH-siH

The success of siRNA in pan> class="Disease">cancer cell treatment relies partly in its ability to escape from lysosomal degradation soon after internalization, so as to silence the post-transcriptional gene expression in the cytoplasm (23). To evaluate this property, the internalization pattern of FAM-siRNA was examined. In the microscopic images of Fig. 4A, the cell nucleus was counterstained with DAPI (blue color), and the green color originated from the fluorescently-labeled siRNA. Following 2 h of CPH-siH incubation, most of the fluorescence was observed in the cytoplasm and in the periphery of the nucleus, indicating successful escape from lysosomal degradation and successful internalization of the NPs. It can be concluded that after reaching the lysosomes, FAM-siRNA dissociated from the CPH-siH NPs and exhibited fluorescence in the cytoplasm.
Figure 4

Intracellular distribution and cytotoxicity of the CPH-siH nanoparticles. (A) Cellular internalization of CPH-siH in A549 cells. The lysosome escape property of CPH-siH was evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Fluorescently-labeled siRNA was used (green), while the nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). (B) Cell viability analysis of A549 cells by MTT assay. The cells were incubated with different concentrations of CPH-siH for 24h. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 between control and CPH-siH 100 nm (n=3). CPH-siH, HA-PEI/heparin/Ca2+/siRNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Cytotoxicity of CPH-siH in A549 cancer cells

The cytotox-icity of pan> class="Chemical">CPH-siH NPs was evaluated using the MTT assay. The A54p lung cancer cells were treated with different concentrations of CPH-siH NPs and incubated for 24 h. Fig. 4B illustrates that CPH-siH nanoparticles exhibited a typical concentration-dependent toxicity in cancer cells; >60% of cell death was observed when treated with the highest concentration of CPH-siH NPs (siRNA, ~100 nm). Furthermore, blank PEI/heparin/Ca2+ NPs did not induce any toxicity in the cancer cells, indicating their safety and lack of side effects (Fig. 4B). It is well-known that PEI induces a cytotoxic effect; however, binding with heparin reduced its toxicity, resulting in biocompatible particles.

Cell apoptosis analysis

To further demonstrate the anpan>tipan> class="Disease">cancer effect of AIB1siRNA-loaded CPH-siH NPs, an apoptosis assay using flow cytometry was performed on A549 cancer cells (Fig. 5). The cells were stained with Annexin V and PI as respective viability and apoptosis phase indicators. Consistent with the cell viability assay, the blank NPs did not induce any apoptosis in the cancer cells (Fig. 5). CPH-siH (25 nm) induced ~14% cell apoptosis while the cell apoptosis % increased with the increase in the concentration of siRNA. CPH-siH at 100 nm dose induced the maximum apoptosis of cancer cells, with nearly ~35% of cells in early and late apoptosis stages (Fig. 5), indicating the potent anticancer effect of AIB1siRNA in lung cancer cells.
Figure 5

Apoptosis assay of A549 cancer cells following treatment with CPH-siH and blank NPs. The effects of the NPs on cell apoptosis were evaluated by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining and flow cytometry. The histogram was divided into four quadrants for Q1, viable; Q2, necrosis; Q3, early apoptosis, and Q4, late apoptosis, respectively. The graph shows the % of cells in the early and late apoptotic stages relative to the total cell number per sample. CPH-siH, HA-PEI/heparin/Ca2+/siRNA; NPs, nanoparticles; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. control.

Protein expression using western blot analysis

The expression levels of the AIB1 protein following treatpan> class="Species">ment with different concentrations of the siRNA-loaded NPs were evaluated by western blot analysis. AIB1 protein was significantly knocked down in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 6), indicating the potent activity of AIB1siRNA in cancer cells. The knockdown of AIB1 protein in a concentration-dependent manner was consistent with the cell viability and apoptosis analysis results. The knockdown effect further emphasized the success of transfection and post-transcriptional activity of the target gene. In addition, the expression levels of the Bcl-2 protein were assessed, and the results demonstrated a concentration-dependent decrease in Bcl-2 protein expression with an increase in the concentration of AIB1siRNA NPs (Fig. 6) (24,25).
Figure 6

Protein expression levels of AIB1 and Bcl-2 in each treatment group. The knockdown effect of AIB1siRNA-loaded CPH-siH in A549 cancer cells was evaluated by western blotting, using GADPH as a loading control. **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 compared with control (n=3). AIB1, nuclear receptor coactivator 3; Bcl-2, BCL2 apoptosis regulator; siRNA, small interfering RNA; CPH-siH, HA-PEI/heparin/Ca2+/siRNA; Con, control.

Overall, the present study emphasized two importanpan>t observationpan>s. First, pan> class="Gene">AIB1siRNA exhibited a potent anticancer effect in cancer cells, and resulted in the knockdown of the AIB1 gene and a significant cytotoxic effect. Second, PEI/heparin/Ca2+, which did not induce any toxic effects on its own, was demonstrated to be an efficient carrier system for the delivery of a gene into cancer cells. A detailed study on experimental animals to assess the in situ and in vivo parameters will be the subject of future investigations. Furthermore, further studies combining the NPs with a second therapeutic moiety are warranted. In conclusion, AIB1siRpan> class="Chemical">NA-loaded PEI/heparin/Ca2+ NPs were successfully prepared and evaluated for their efficacy in lung cancer cells. The results demonstrated that the PEI and heparin complex reduced the toxic effect in cancer cells while maintaining its transfection efficiency. A nanosized particle of ~25 nm was formulated, and the siRNA was demonstrated to possess excellent binding efficiency in the particles. Confocal microscopy revealed that FAM-siRNA dissociated from the CPH-siH nanoparticles and exhibited maximum fluorescence in the cytoplasm, which is important for its post-transcriptional activity. CPH-siH NPs exhibited a typical concentration-dependent toxicity in cancer cells, while blank PEI/heparin/Ca2+ did not induce any toxicity, indicating its safety and lack of side effects. CPH-siH at the dose of 100 nm induced the maximum apoptosis of cancer cells with ~35% of cells in the early and late apoptosis stages. The AIB1 protein was knocked down in a concentration-dependent manner, demonstrating the potent activity of AIB1siRNA in cancer cells. Together, these findings indicated that PEI/heparin/Ca2+-HA NPs may be promising carriers for the anticancer activity of AIB1siRNA in lung cancer cells.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David S Ettinger; Wallace Akerley; Gerold Bepler; Matthew G Blum; Andrew Chang; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Todd L Demmy; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Ramaswamy Govindan; Frederic W Grannis; Thierry Jahan; Mohammad Jahanzeb; David H Johnson; Anne Kessinger; Ritsuko Komaki; Feng-Ming Kong; Mark G Kris; Lee M Krug; Quynh-Thu Le; Inga T Lennes; Renato Martins; Janis O'Malley; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Eric Rohren; George R Simon; Scott J Swanson; Douglas E Wood; Stephen C Yang
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Engineering of caveolae-specific self-micellizing anticancer lipid nanoparticles to enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Pasupathi Sundaramoorthy; Thiruganesh Ramasamy; Siddhartha Kumar Mishra; Keun-Yeong Jeong; Chul Soon Yong; Jong Oh Kim; Hwan Mook Kim
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Simultaneous delivery of siRNA and paclitaxel via a "two-in-one" micelleplex promotes synergistic tumor suppression.

Authors:  Tian-Meng Sun; Jin-Zhi Du; Yan-Dan Yao; Cheng-Qiong Mao; Shuang Dou; Song-Yin Huang; Pei-Zhuo Zhang; Kam W Leong; Er-Wei Song; Jun Wang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 4.  Emerging potential of stimulus-responsive nanosized anticancer drug delivery systems for systemic applications.

Authors:  Hima Bindu Ruttala; Thiruganesh Ramasamy; Thiagarajan Madeshwaran; Tran Tuan Hiep; Umadevi Kandasamy; Kyung Taek Oh; Han-Gon Choi; Chul Soon Yong; Jong Oh Kim
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.946

Review 5.  Protamine-oligonucleotide-nanoparticles: Recent advances in drug delivery and drug targeting.

Authors:  B Scheicher; A-L Schachner-Nedherer; A Zimmer
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Transgene expression in mouse airway epithelium by aerosol gene therapy with PEI-DNA complexes.

Authors:  A Gautam; C L Densmore; E Golunski; B Xu; J C Waldrep
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 7.  Local drug delivery strategies for cancer treatment: gels, nanoparticles, polymeric films, rods, and wafers.

Authors:  Jesse B Wolinsky; Yolonda L Colson; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Experimental rat lung tumor model with intrabronchial tumor cell implantation.

Authors:  Antero Gomes Neto; Antônio Felipe Leite Simão; Samuel de Paula Miranda; Lívia Talita Cajaseiras Mourão; Nilfácio Prado Bezerra; Paulo Roberto Carvalho de Almeida; Ronaldo de Albuquerque Ribeiro
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.388

9.  AIB1/SRC-3 deficiency affects insulin-like growth factor I signaling pathway and suppresses v-Ha-ras-induced breast cancer initiation and progression in mice.

Authors:  Shao-Qing Kuang; Lan Liao; Hao Zhang; Adrian V Lee; Bert W O'Malley; Jianming Xu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  SRC-3 has a role in cancer other than as a nuclear receptor coactivator.

Authors:  Gang Ma; Yu Ren; Ke Wang; Jianjun He
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 6.580

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Heparin and Its Derivatives: Challenges and Advances in Therapeutic Biomolecules.

Authors:  Nipa Banik; Seong-Bin Yang; Tae-Bong Kang; Ji-Hong Lim; Jooho Park
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.