| Literature DB >> 30535415 |
Gang Wu1, Yu Wang1, Jing Nan Wang1, Xue Zhun Chen1, Qi Xing Hu1, Yan Fan Yang1, Qi Qing Liu1.
Abstract
Propylaea japonica (Thunberg) was a dominant species among the predacious ladybirds in the fields and active from March to November during a year in Fuzhou, China. Stability of insecticide resistance and vitality in adult P. japonica were investigated. The field ladybird P. japonica in Fuzhou, China, showed 9- to 16-fold resistance ratios to chlorpyrifos, 13- to 2,083-fold to methamidophos, 32- to 230-fold to fenvalerate, and 4- to 49-fold to avermectins, respectively, based on the field monitoring during 2004, 2009, and 2012, as compared with insecticide-susceptible F39 progenies. The resistance levels in the field P. japonica were high during May and November but low during summer. The population growth tendency index in field P. japonica was 0.8-fold as high as that in insecticide-susceptible P. japonica. The field P. japonica also showed high tolerance to the insecticide as compared with pest Lipaphis erysimi Kaltenbach and two parasitoids Diaeretiella rapae and Pachyneuron aphidis. Stable insecticide resistance levels and high vitality were found first in adult P. japonica with 1-, 30-, or 60-d-old adults, or among the adults developed form the eggs produced by newly emerged adults or by 60-d-old adults. Increased activity of glutathione S-transferases, carboxylesterases, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases might be involved in the resistance of P. japonica. The results indicated that, in certain areas, inclusion of P. japonica for pest control in the integrated pest management would be highly recommended.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30535415 PMCID: PMC6287052 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iey109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Experimental population life tables on resistant and susceptible strains of P. japonica
| Biological characteristics | Field populationa | F39 |
|---|---|---|
| Neonate number | 54 (3)c | 70(3) |
| Survival rate from neonate to second larvae (%) | 93.8 ± 10.8a | 97.9 ± 3.61a |
| Survival rate from second to third larvae (%) | 97.9 ± 3.61a | 97.9 ± 3.61a |
| Survival rate from third to fourth larvae (%) | 97.8 ± 3.85a | 100 ± 0.00a |
| Survival rate from fourth larvae to pupae (%) | 97.9 ± 3.61a | 100 ± 0.00a |
| Pupation rate (%) | 97.8 ± 3.85a | 95.8 ± 7.22a |
| Emergence rate (%) | 100 ± 0.00a | 100 ± 0.00a |
| Female rate (%) | 48.9 ± 5.57a | 52.3 ± 1.92a |
| Fecundity number/female | 483 ± 81.6a | 531 ± 77.8a |
| Next generation larvae | 10,956 | 17,845 |
| Population growth tendency index ( | 203 | 255 |
| Relative fitness | 0.80 | 1.00 |
aThe field P. japonica were collected from the commercial field in Oct. 2012, and the insect’s susceptibility was showed in Table 1.
bDifferent letters indicate significant differences between field population collected in Oct. 2012 and F39 progenies (t-test, P ≤ 0.05).
cNumber in parentheses indicate the number of replicates.
The susceptibility to insecticides in insecticide-resistant and -susceptible P. japonica
| Insecticides | Collection datea | LC50 (95% CL) (mg/liter) (48 h)b | Slope ± SDb | Ratiosc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorpyrifos | F0 | 124 (103–147) | 2.57 ± 0.25 | 37.2 |
| F4 | 60.8 (45.7–80.9) | 2.45 ± 0.37 | 18.3 | |
| F20 | 8.25 (2.79–24.54) | 3.28 + 1.23 | 2.5 | |
| F39 | 3.33 (1.49–7.42) | 0.76 ± 0.27 | 1 | |
| May 12 | 54.3 (46.2–63.8) | 2.79 ± 0.23 | 16.3 | |
| Sep. 12 | 29.6 (20.5–42.6) | 7.15 ± 1.36 | 8.9 | |
| Oct. 12 | 50.1 (46.5–62.9) | 1.53 ± 0.12 | 15.1 | |
| Methamidophos | F0 | 105 (67.0–166) | 4.82 ± 1.00 | 45.6 |
| F4 | 89.9 (58.6–138) | 5.12 ± 1.07 | 39.1 | |
| F20 | 25.3 (22.9–28.1) | 2.33 ± 0.12 | 11 | |
| F39 | 2.30 (1.91–2.27) | 2.30 ± 0.22 | 1 | |
| May 04 | 1170 (873–1570) | 1.76 ± 0.21 | 509 | |
| Sep. 04 | 104 (78.5–137) | 1.91 ± 0.25 | 45.2 | |
| Oct. 04 | 1189 (857–1648) | 1.56 ± 0.20 | 517 | |
| Nov. 04 | 4790 (3620~6350) | 1.89 ± 0.24 | 2083 | |
| May 12 | 93.8 (51.9–170) | 4.60 ± 1.33 | 313 | |
| Sep. 12 | 30.0 (23.4–38.5) | 7.49 ± 0.97 | 13.0 | |
| Oct. 12 | 65.6 (35.8–120) | 4.64 ± 1.04 | 28.8 | |
| Fenvalerate | F0 | 421 (274–646) | 4.84 ± 0.95 | 188 |
| F4 | 231 (201–266) | 3.00 ± 0.22 | 103 | |
| F20 | 20.4 (12.3–33.9) | 5.32 + 1.45 | 9.1 | |
| F39 | 2.24 (1.45–3.45) | 1.25 ± 0.28 | 1 | |
| May 04 | 514 (390–677) | 1.94 ± 0.26 | 230 | |
| Sep. 04 | 286 (227–359) | 2.43 ± 0.31 | 128 | |
| Oct. 04 | 380 (249–580) | 1.35 ± 0.18 | 158 | |
| May 12 | 264 (214–325) | 2.53 ± 0.27 | 118 | |
| Sep. 12 | 71.5(42.2–121) | 4.58 ± 1.09 | 31.9 | |
| Oct. 12 | 131 (109–158) | 2.02 ± 0.23 | 58.5 | |
| Avermectin | F0 | 87.5 (55.0–139) | 5.07 ± 1.16 | 46.8 |
| F4 | 32.6 (24.5–43.3) | 7.37 ± 1.09 | 17.4 | |
| F20 | 2.38 (1.63–3.48) | 6.62 + 1.20 | 1.3 | |
| F39 | 1.87 (1.16–3.00) | 1.05 ± 0.18 | 1 | |
| May 04 | 91.2 (70.0–119) | 2.03 ± 0.34 | 48.8 | |
| Sep. 04 | 8.08 (6.16–10.6) | 2.33 ± 0.31 | 4.32 | |
| Oct. 04 | 88.6 (66.7–118) | 1.86 ± 0.25 | 47.4 | |
| May 12 | 89.3 (58.2–137) | 5.17 ± 1.09 | 47.8 | |
| Sep. 12 | 33.2 (19.4–56.9) | 4.46 ± 0.58 | 17.8 | |
| Oct. 12 | 70.0 (58.9–83.2) | 2.27 ± 0.33 | 37.4 |
aF0 were collected from the commercial fields in 2009. In field monitoring, the field adult P. japonica were collected from the commercial fields in 2004 and 2012, respectively.
bThe values of χ2 (df = 3) were ~1.81 to 7.50, and <7.82, which indicated that a significant fit between the observed and expected regression lines (P ≤ 0.05).
cResistance ratio = LC50 in other populations /LC50 in F39.
The susceptibility to insecticides in the field populations of L. erysimi collected from Sj in 2004
| Insecticides | Collection date | LC50 (95% CL) mg/liter) (24 or 48 h)a | Slope ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Methamidophos | May 04 | 551 (426–714) | 2.18 ± 0.23 |
| Sep. 04 | 196 (142–263) | 2.37 ± 0.33 | |
| Oct. 04 | 527 (409–678) | 1.94 ± 0.27 | |
| Nov. 04 | 820 (616–1091) | 1.93 ± 0.26 | |
| Fenvalerate | May 04 | 532 (336–845) | 1.43 ± 0.13 |
| Sep. 04 | 172 (132–219) | 3.12 ± 0.28 | |
| Oct. 04 | 345 (246–486) | 1.54 ± 0.23 | |
| Nov. 04 | 546 (319–762) | 1.60 ± 0.20 | |
| Avermectin | May 04 | 4.91 (3.76–6.57) | 2.39 ± 0.26 |
| Sep. 04 | 0.80 (0.61–1.04) | 3.80 ± 0.50 | |
| Oct. 04 | 1.03 (0.73–1.45) | 2.05 ± 0.32 | |
| Nov. 04 | 5.29 (3.72–7.54) | 1.41 ± 0.15 | |
|
| |||
| Methamidophos | Oct. 04 | 9.94 (7.15–13.8) | 1.52 ± 0.21 |
| Fenvalerate | Oct. 04 | 57.3 (41.33–79.4) | 1.91 ± 0.30 |
| Avermectin | Oct. 04 | 19.7 (14.9–26.1) | 1.24 ± 0.17 |
|
| |||
| Methamidophos | Oct. 04 | 9,617 (7,556–12,240) | 2.27 ± 0.32 |
| Fenvalerate | Oct. 04 | 837 (635–1103) | 1.97 ± 0.30 |
| Avermectin | Oct. 04 | 2.76 (1.86–4.10) | 1.43 ± 0.18 |
|
| |||
| Methamidophos | Oct. 04 | 1.83 (1.51–2.18) | 9.27 ± 1.30 |
| Fenvalerate | Oct. 04 | 53.3 (41.5–68.8) | 3.84 ± 0.61 |
| Avermectin | Oct. 04 | 6.10 (5.06–7.43) | 5.39 ± 0.80 |
|
| |||
| Methamidophos | Oct. 04 | 0.67 (0.48–0.89) | 6.18 ± 0.82 |
| Fenvalerate | Oct. 04 | 38.1 (31.0–45.7) | 5.28 ± 0.68 |
| Avermectin | Oct. 04 | 5.34 (4.57–6.17) | 5.06 ± 0.48 |
aThe L. erysimi were bioassay by leaf-dipping method. The ladybirds and parasitoids were bioassay by dry film method. Mortality was recorded 24 h (for L. erysimi, D. rapae, and Pa. aphidis) or 48 h (for C. quadriplagiata and M. discolor), and LC50 values were calculated. The values of χ2 (df = 3) were <7.82 (=0.62–5.86), which indicated a significant fit between the observed and expected regression lines (P ≤ 0.05).
The susceptibility to insecticides in adult of field P. japonica with different age
| Insecticides | Age of adults (d) | LC50 (95% CL) (mg/liter) (48 h) | Slope ± SD | Ratiosc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorpyrifos | 1a | 50.1 (46.5–62.9) | 1.53 ± 0.12 | 15.1 |
| 30a | 59.4 (52.6–67.0) | 2.84 ± 0.18 | 17.8 | |
| 60a | 39.0 (23.7–64.2) | 4.77 ± 1.11 | 11.7 | |
| 1b | 43.0 (26.1–70.6) | 4.93 ± 1.19 | 12.9 | |
| Fenvalerate | 1a | 131 (109–158) | 2.02 ± 0.23 | 58.5 |
| 30a | 126 (107–148) | 2.52 ± 0.21 | 56.3 | |
| 60a | 79.8 (43.0–148) | 4.54 ± 1.33 | 35.6 | |
| 1b | 152 (129–178) | 2.52 ± 0.21 | 67.9 | |
| Avermectin | 1a | 70.0 (58.9–83.2) | 2.27 ± 0.33 | 37.4 |
| 30a | 66.4 (38.7–114) | 4.46 ± 1.05 | 35.5 | |
| 60a | 46.0 (35.8–59.0) | 2.63 ± 0.33 | 24.6 | |
| 1b | 47.6 (29.1–77.9) | 5.12 ± 1.27 | 25.5 |
aThe adults of P. japonica were developed from the eggs produced by newly emerged adults, and the 1-, 30-, or 60-d-old adults were used for bioassays, respectively.
bThe adults of P. japonica were developed from the eggs produced by 60-d-old adults, and the 1-d-old adults were used for bioassays.
cRatio = LC50 in different populations tested in Table 2/LC50 in F39 in Table 1.
Comparisons on the resistance-related enzymes between resistant strains and susceptible strains of P. japonica
| Enzyme activitya | F0 | Ratios | Field populationb | Ratios | F20 | Ratios | F39 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AChE | — | — | 1.71 ± 0.13a | 1.0 | — | — | 1.67 ± 0.22a |
| CarE | 276 ± 9.11a | 5.7 | 182 ± 7.47c | 3.8 | 208 ± 6.39b | 4.3 | 48.2 ± 6.42d |
| GSTs | 66.7 ± 2.09a | 2.4 | 43.1 ± 2.37b | 1.6 | 36.9 ± 11.6b | 1.4 | 27.4 ± 3.60c |
| P450 | 0.22 ± 0.049a | 3.1 | 0.184 ± 0.0080a | 2.5 | 0.072 ± 0.045b | 1.0 | 0.074 ± 0.0027b |
aThe units of enzyme activity were nmol/min/mg pro for AChE, CarE, and GSTs. The unit of P450 content was nmol/mg pro. Different letters after the mean ± SD values indicate significant difference among F0, F20, field population, and F39 (Dacunt test, P < 0.05).
bThe field population were collected from the commercial field in Oct. 2012.