Literature DB >> 30535345

Assessment of a Targeted Electronic Health Record Intervention to Reduce Telemetry Duration: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nader Najafi1, Russ Cucina1, Bruce Pierre2, Raman Khanna1.   

Abstract

Importance: Physicians frequently use cardiac monitoring, or telemetry, beyond the duration recommended by published practice standards, resulting in "alarm fatigue" and excess cost. Prior studies have demonstrated an association between multicomponent quality improvement interventions and safe reduction of telemetry duration. Objective: To determine if a single-component intervention, a targeted electronic health record (EHR) alert, could achieve similar gains to multicomponent interventions and safely reduce unnecessary monitoring. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted between November 2016 and May 2017 on the general medicine service of the Division of Hospital Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center and included physicians of 12 inpatient medical teams (6 intervention, 6 control). Interventions: The EHR alert was randomized to half of the teams on the general medicine service. The alert displayed during daytime hours when physicians attempted to place an order for patients not in the intensive care unit whose telemetry order duration exceeded the recommended duration for a given indication. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was telemetry monitoring hours per hospitalization, which was measured using time-stamped orders data from the EHR database. Physician responses to the alert were collected using EHR reporting tools. The potential adverse outcomes of rapid-response calls and medical emergency events were measured by counting the notes documenting these events in the EHR.
Results: Of the 1021 patients included in this study, in the intervention arm, there was a mean (SD) age of 64.5 (18.9) and 215 (45%) were women; in the control arm, there was a mean (SD) age of 63.8 (19.1) and 249 (46%) were women. The 12 teams were stratified to 8 house-staff teams and 4 hospitalist teams, with 499 hospitalizations analyzed in the intervention arm and 567 hospitalizations analyzed in the control arm. The alert prompted a significant reduction in telemetry monitoring duration (-8.7 hours per hospitalization; 95% CI, -14.1 to -3.5 hours; P = .001) with no significant change in rapid-response calls or medical emergency events. The most common physician response to the alert was to discontinue telemetry monitoring (62% of 200 alerts). Conclusions and Relevance: A targeted EHR alert can safely and successfully reduce cardiac monitoring by prompting discontinuation when appropriate. This single-component electronic intervention is less resource intensive than typical multicomponent interventions that include human resources. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02529176.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30535345      PMCID: PMC6583411          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  12 in total

1.  Impact of cardiac telemetry on patient safety and cost.

Authors:  Evan M Benjamin; Robert A Klugman; Roger Luckmann; David G Fairchild; Susan A Abookire
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Choosing wisely in adult hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value.

Authors:  John Bulger; Wendy Nickel; Jordan Messler; Jenna Goldstein; James O'Callaghan; Moises Auron; Mangla Gulati
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Monitor alarm fatigue: standardizing use of physiological monitors and decreasing nuisance alarms.

Authors:  Kelly Creighton Graham; Maria Cvach
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Hospitalist intervention for appropriate use of telemetry reduces length of stay and cost.

Authors:  David Svec; Neera Ahuja; Kambria H Evans; Jason Hom; Trit Garg; Pooja Loftus; Lisa Shieh
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.960

5.  Altering overuse of cardiac telemetry in non-intensive care unit settings by hardwiring the use of American Heart Association guidelines.

Authors:  Robert Dressler; Marylou M Dryer; Christian Coletti; Donna Mahoney; Andrew J Doorey
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  ALARMED: adverse events in low-risk patients with chest pain receiving continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in the emergency department. A pilot study.

Authors:  Clare Atzema; Michael J Schull; Bjug Borgundvaag; Graham R D Slaughter; Cheong K Lee
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Use and outcomes of telemetry monitoring on a medicine service.

Authors:  Nader Najafi; Andrew Auerbach
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-09-24

8.  Decrease in Inpatient Telemetry Utilization Through a System-Wide Electronic Health Record Change and a Multifaceted Hospitalist Intervention.

Authors:  Karli Edholm; Polina Kukhareva; Claire Ciarkowski; Jason Carr; David Gill; Austin Rupp; Jack Morshedzadeh; Nathan Wanner; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 9.  Update to Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Kristin E Sandau; Marjorie Funk; Andrew Auerbach; Gregory W Barsness; Kay Blum; Maria Cvach; Rachel Lampert; Jeanine L May; George M McDaniel; Marco V Perez; Sue Sendelbach; Claire E Sommargren; Paul J Wang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Reducing Over-Utilization of Cardiac Telemetry with Pop-Ups in an Electronic Medical Record System.

Authors:  Wajeeha Rizvi; Cyrus M Munguti; Jeet Mehta; K James Kallail; Darrell Youngman; Samer Antonios
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-29
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Direct oral anticoagulants: a review on the current role and scope of reversal agents.

Authors:  Rahul Chaudhary; Tushar Sharma; Jalaj Garg; Ajaypaul Sukhi; Kevin Bliden; Udaya Tantry; Mohit Turagam; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Paul Gurbel
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Practical steps to identifying the research risk of pragmatic trials.

Authors:  Scott Yh Kim; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.599

3.  Alert burden in pediatric hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis of six academic pediatric health systems using novel metrics.

Authors:  Evan W Orenstein; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Naveen Muthu; Juan D Chaparro; Philip A Hagedorn; Adam C Dziorny; Adam Moses; Sean Hernandez; Amina Khan; Hannah B Huth; Jonathan M Beus; Eric S Kirkendall
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.942

4.  Changing Provider PSA Screening Behavior Using Best Practice Advisories: Interventional Study in a Multispecialty Group Practice.

Authors:  Joseph Presti; Stacey Alexeeff; Brandon Horton; Stephanie Prausnitz; Andrew L Avins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.