Bas C Stunnenberg1, Joost Raaphorst1,2, Hans M Groenewoud3, Jeffrey M Statland4, Robert C Griggs5, Willem Woertman3, Dick F Stegeman1, Janneke Timmermans6, Jaya Trivedi7, Emma Matthews8, Christiaan G J Saris1, Bas J Schouwenberg9, Gea Drost10, Baziel G M van Engelen1, Gert Jan van der Wilt3. 1. Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City. 5. Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. 6. Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 7. Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 8. MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom. 9. Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 10. University of Groningen, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
Importance: In rare diseases it is difficult to achieve high-quality evidence of treatment efficacy because of small cohorts and clinical heterogeneity. With emerging treatments for rare diseases, innovative trial designs are needed. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of mexiletine in nondystrophic myotonia using an aggregated N-of-1 trials design and compare results between this innovative design and a previously conducted RCT. Design, Setting, and Participants: A series of aggregated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled N-of-1-trials, performed in a single academic referral center. Thirty Dutch adult patients with genetically confirmed nondystrophic myotonia (38 patients screened) were enrolled between February 2014 and June 2015. Follow-up was completed in September 2016. Interventions: Mexiletine (600 mg daily) vs placebo during multiple treatment periods of 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reduction in daily-reported muscle stiffness on a scale of 1 to 9, with higher scores indicating more impairment. A Bayesian hierarchical model aggregated individual N-of-1 trial data to determine the posterior probability of reaching a clinically meaningful effect of a greater than 0.75-point difference. Results: Among 30 enrolled patients (mean age, 43.4 [SD, 15.24] years; 22% men; 19 CLCN1 and 11 SCN4A genotype), 27 completed the study and 3 dropped out (1 because of a serious adverse event). In 24 of the 27 completers, a clinically meaningful treatment effect was found. In the Bayesian hierarchical model, mexiletine resulted in a 100% posterior probability of reaching a clinically meaningful reduction in self-reported muscle stiffness for the nondystrophic myotonia group overall and the CLCN1 genotype subgroup and 93% posterior probability for the SCN4A genotype subgroup. In the total nondystrophic myotonia group, the median muscle stiffness score was 6.08 (interquartile range, 4.71-6.80) at baseline and was 2.50 (95% credible interval [CrI], 1.77-3.24) during the mexiletine period and 5.56 (95% CrI, 4.73-6.39) during the placebo period; difference in symptom score reduction, 3.06 (95% CrI, 1.96-4.15; n = 27) favoring mexiletine. The most common adverse event was gastrointestinal discomfort (21 mexiletine [70%], 1 placebo [3%]). One serious adverse event occurred (1 mexiletine [3%]; allergic skin reaction). Using frequentist reanalysis, mexiletine compared with placebo resulted in a mean reduction in daily-reported muscle stiffness of 3.12 (95% CI, 2.46-3.78), consistent with the previous RCT treatment effect of 2.69 (95% CI, 2.12-3.26). Conclusions and Relevance: In a series of N-of-1 trials of mexiletine vs placebo in patients with nondystrophic myotonia, there was a reduction in mean daily-reported muscle stiffness that was consistent with the treatment effect in a previous randomized clinical trial. These findings support the efficacy of mexiletine for treatment of nondystrophic myotonia as well as the feasibility of N-of-1 trials for assessing interventions in some chronic rare diseases. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02045667.
RCT Entities:
Importance: In rare diseases it is difficult to achieve high-quality evidence of treatment efficacy because of small cohorts and clinical heterogeneity. With emerging treatments for rare diseases, innovative trial designs are needed. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of mexiletine in nondystrophic myotonia using an aggregated N-of-1 trials design and compare results between this innovative design and a previously conducted RCT. Design, Setting, and Participants: A series of aggregated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled N-of-1-trials, performed in a single academic referral center. Thirty Dutch adult patients with genetically confirmed nondystrophic myotonia (38 patients screened) were enrolled between February 2014 and June 2015. Follow-up was completed in September 2016. Interventions: Mexiletine (600 mg daily) vs placebo during multiple treatment periods of 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reduction in daily-reported muscle stiffness on a scale of 1 to 9, with higher scores indicating more impairment. A Bayesian hierarchical model aggregated individual N-of-1 trial data to determine the posterior probability of reaching a clinically meaningful effect of a greater than 0.75-point difference. Results: Among 30 enrolled patients (mean age, 43.4 [SD, 15.24] years; 22% men; 19 CLCN1 and 11 SCN4A genotype), 27 completed the study and 3 dropped out (1 because of a serious adverse event). In 24 of the 27 completers, a clinically meaningful treatment effect was found. In the Bayesian hierarchical model, mexiletine resulted in a 100% posterior probability of reaching a clinically meaningful reduction in self-reported muscle stiffness for the nondystrophic myotonia group overall and the CLCN1 genotype subgroup and 93% posterior probability for the SCN4A genotype subgroup. In the total nondystrophic myotonia group, the median muscle stiffness score was 6.08 (interquartile range, 4.71-6.80) at baseline and was 2.50 (95% credible interval [CrI], 1.77-3.24) during the mexiletine period and 5.56 (95% CrI, 4.73-6.39) during the placebo period; difference in symptom score reduction, 3.06 (95% CrI, 1.96-4.15; n = 27) favoring mexiletine. The most common adverse event was gastrointestinal discomfort (21 mexiletine [70%], 1 placebo [3%]). One serious adverse event occurred (1 mexiletine [3%]; allergic skin reaction). Using frequentist reanalysis, mexiletine compared with placebo resulted in a mean reduction in daily-reported muscle stiffness of 3.12 (95% CI, 2.46-3.78), consistent with the previous RCT treatment effect of 2.69 (95% CI, 2.12-3.26). Conclusions and Relevance: In a series of N-of-1 trials of mexiletine vs placebo in patients with nondystrophic myotonia, there was a reduction in mean daily-reported muscle stiffness that was consistent with the treatment effect in a previous randomized clinical trial. These findings support the efficacy of mexiletine for treatment of nondystrophic myotonia as well as the feasibility of N-of-1 trials for assessing interventions in some chronic rare diseases. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02045667.
Authors: E L Logigian; W B Martens; R T Moxley; M P McDermott; N Dilek; A W Wiegner; A T Pearson; C A Barbieri; C L Annis; C A Thornton; R T Moxley Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: B G M van Engelen; H van Veenendaal; P A van Doorn; C G Faber; J H van der Hoeven; N G Janssen; N C Notermans; I N van Schaik; L H Visser; J J G M Verschuuren Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: P C Nathan; G Tomlinson; L L Dupuis; M L Greenberg; S Ota; U Bartels; B M Feldman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2005-07-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J Trip; G Drost; H B Ginjaar; F H M Nieman; A J van der Kooi; M de Visser; B G M van Engelen; C G Faber Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Bas C Stunnenberg; Samantha LoRusso; W David Arnold; Richard J Barohn; Stephen C Cannon; Bertrand Fontaine; Robert C Griggs; Michael G Hanna; Emma Matthews; Giovanni Meola; Valeria A Sansone; Jaya R Trivedi; Baziel G M van Engelen; Savine Vicart; Jeffrey M Statland Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Parag Goyal; Monika M Safford; Sarah N Hilmer; Michael A Steinman; Daniel D Matlock; Mathew S Maurer; Mark S Lachs; Ian M Kronish Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Jules M Janssen Daalen; Marjan J Meinders; Federica Giardina; Kit C B Roes; Bas C Stunnenberg; Soania Mathur; Philip N Ainslie; Dick H J Thijssen; Bastiaan R Bloem Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: Christina Mousele; Emma Matthews; Robert D S Pitceathly; Michael G Hanna; Susan MacDonald; Konstantinos Savvatis; Aisling Carr; Christopher Turner Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2021-10
Authors: Chad Heatwole; Elizabeth Luebbe; Spencer Rosero; Katy Eichinger; William Martens; James Hilbert; Jeanne Dekdebrun; Nuran Dilek; Christine Zizzi; Nicholas Johnson; Araya Puwanant; Rabi Tawil; Giovanni Schifitto; Christopher A Beck; J Franklin Richeson; Wojciech Zareba; Charles Thornton; Michael P McDermott; Richard Moxley Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dorinde M van Andel; Jan J Sprengers; Bob Oranje; Floortje E Scheepers; Floor E Jansen; Hilgo Bruining Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 7.509