William J Van Der Pol1, Ranjit Kumar1, Casey D Morrow2, Eugene E Blanchard3, Christopher M Taylor3, David H Martin4,5, Elliot J Lefkowitz1,6, Christina A Muzny7. 1. Biomedical Informatics, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 2. Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 3. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health, New Orleans. 5. Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans. 6. Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 7. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Abstract
Background: Identification of bacteria in human vaginal specimens is commonly performed using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences. However, studies utilize different 16S primer sets, sequence databases, and parameters for sample and database clustering. Our goal was to assess the ability of these methods to detect common species of vaginal bacteria. Methods: We performed an in silico analysis of 16S rRNA gene primer sets, targeting different hypervariable regions. Using vaginal samples from women with bacterial vaginosis, we sequenced 16S genes using the V1-V3, V3-V4, and V4 primer sets. For analysis, we used an extended Greengenes database including 16S gene sequences from vaginal bacteria not already present. We compared results with those obtained using the SILVA 16S database. Using multiple database and sample clustering parameters, each primer set's ability to detect common vaginal bacteria at the species level was determined. We also compared these methods to the use of DADA2 for denoising and clustering of sequence reads. Results: V4 sequence reads clustered at 99% identity and using the 99% clustered, extended Greengenes database provided optimal species-level identification of vaginal bacteria. Conclusions: This study is a first step toward standardizing methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of vaginal microbiome data.
Background: Identification of bacteria in human vaginal specimens is commonly performed using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences. However, studies utilize different 16S primer sets, sequence databases, and parameters for sample and database clustering. Our goal was to assess the ability of these methods to detect common species of vaginal bacteria. Methods: We performed an in silico analysis of 16S rRNA gene primer sets, targeting different hypervariable regions. Using vaginal samples from women with bacterial vaginosis, we sequenced 16S genes using the V1-V3, V3-V4, and V4 primer sets. For analysis, we used an extended Greengenes database including 16S gene sequences from vaginal bacteria not already present. We compared results with those obtained using the SILVA 16S database. Using multiple database and sample clustering parameters, each primer set's ability to detect common vaginal bacteria at the species level was determined. We also compared these methods to the use of DADA2 for denoising and clustering of sequence reads. Results: V4 sequence reads clustered at 99% identity and using the 99% clustered, extended Greengenes database provided optimal species-level identification of vaginal bacteria. Conclusions: This study is a first step toward standardizing methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of vaginal microbiome data.
Authors: H L Martin; B A Richardson; P M Nyange; L Lavreys; S L Hillier; B Chohan; K Mandaliya; J O Ndinya-Achola; J Bwayo; J Kreiss Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Gregory T Spear; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; M Reza Zariffard; Alan L Landay; Audrey L French; Patrick M Gillevet Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Cindy M Liu; Bruce A Hungate; Aaron A R Tobian; Jacques Ravel; Jessica L Prodger; David Serwadda; Godfrey Kigozi; Ronald M Galiwango; Fred Nalugoda; Paul Keim; Maria J Wawer; Lance B Price; Ronald H Gray Journal: MBio Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Roxana J Hickey; Xia Zhou; Matthew L Settles; Julie Erb; Kristin Malone; Melanie A Hansmann; Marcia L Shew; Barbara Van Der Pol; J Dennis Fortenberry; Larry J Forney Journal: MBio Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Christian Quast; Elmar Pruesse; Pelin Yilmaz; Jan Gerken; Timmy Schweer; Pablo Yarza; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Christina A Muzny; Imran R Sunesara; Ranjit Kumar; Leandro A Mena; Michael E Griswold; David H Martin; Elliot J Lefkowitz; Jane R Schwebke; Edwin Swiatlo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marcela Zozaya; Michael J Ferris; Julia D Siren; Rebecca Lillis; Leann Myers; M Jacques Nsuami; A Murat Eren; Jonathan Brown; Christopher M Taylor; David H Martin Journal: Microbiome Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Johnathon H Moore; Kristen S Smith; Dongquan Chen; Donald A Lamb; Morgan A Smith; Shelby C Osburn; Bradley A Ruple; Casey D Morrow; Kevin W Huggins; James R McDonald; Michael D Brown; Kaelin C Young; Michael D Roberts; Andrew D Frugé Journal: Sports (Basel) Date: 2022-04-22
Authors: Sunwha Park; Young-Ah You; Young-Han Kim; Eunjin Kwon; AbuZar Ansari; Soo Min Kim; Gain Lee; Young Min Hur; Yun Ji Jung; Kwangmin Kim; Young Ju Kim Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Erica L Plummer; Lenka A Vodstrcil; Christopher K Fairley; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Suzanne M Garland; Matthew G Law; Jane S Hocking; Katherine A Fethers; Dieter M Bulach; Gerald L Murray; Catriona S Bradshaw Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mykhaylo Usyk; Nicolas F Schlecht; Sarah Pickering; LaShanda Williams; Christopher C Sollecito; Ana Gradissimo; Carolina Porras; Mahboobeh Safaeian; Ligia Pinto; Rolando Herrero; Howard D Strickler; Shankar Viswanathan; Anne Nucci-Sack; Angela Diaz; Robert D Burk Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Mykhaylo Usyk; Christine P Zolnik; Philip E Castle; Carolina Porras; Rolando Herrero; Ana Gradissimo; Paula Gonzalez; Mahboobeh Safaeian; Mark Schiffman; Robert D Burk Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 6.823