Daisy J M Ermers1, Karin J H van Bussel2, Marieke Perry3, Yvonne Engels1, Henk J Schers2. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is a crucial element of palliative care. It improves the quality of end-of-life care and reduces aggressive and needless life-prolonging medical interventions. However, little is known about its application in daily practice. This study aims to examine the application of ACP for patients with cancer in general practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in 11 general practices in the Netherlands. Electronic patient records (EPRs) of deceased patients with colorectal or lung cancer were analysed. Data on ACP documentation, correspondence between medical specialist and GP, and health care use in the last year of life were extracted. RESULTS: Records of 163 deceased patients were analysed. In 74% of the records, one or more ACP items were registered. GPs especially documented patients' preferences for euthanasia (58%), palliative sedation (46%) and preferred place of death (26%). Per patient, GPs received on average six letters from medical specialists. These letters mainly contained information regarding medical treatment and rarely ACP items. In the last year of life, patients contacted the GP over 30 times, and 51% visited the emergency department at least once, of whom 54% in the last month. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of ACP items in GPs' EPRs appeared to be limited. ACP elements were rarely subject of communication between primary and secondary care, which may impact the continuity of patient care during the last year of life. More emphasis on registration of ACP items and better exchange of information regarding patients' preferences are needed.
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is a crucial element of palliative care. It improves the quality of end-of-life care and reduces aggressive and needless life-prolonging medical interventions. However, little is known about its application in daily practice. This study aims to examine the application of ACP for patients with cancer in general practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in 11 general practices in the Netherlands. Electronic patient records (EPRs) of deceased patients with colorectal or lung cancer were analysed. Data on ACP documentation, correspondence between medical specialist and GP, and health care use in the last year of life were extracted. RESULTS: Records of 163 deceased patients were analysed. In 74% of the records, one or more ACP items were registered. GPs especially documented patients' preferences for euthanasia (58%), palliative sedation (46%) and preferred place of death (26%). Per patient, GPs received on average six letters from medical specialists. These letters mainly contained information regarding medical treatment and rarely ACP items. In the last year of life, patients contacted the GP over 30 times, and 51% visited the emergency department at least once, of whom 54% in the last month. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of ACP items in GPs' EPRs appeared to be limited. ACP elements were rarely subject of communication between primary and secondary care, which may impact the continuity of patient care during the last year of life. More emphasis on registration of ACP items and better exchange of information regarding patients' preferences are needed.
Authors: Anouk S Schuit; Karen Holtmaat; Nienke Hooghiemstra; Femke Jansen; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Veerle M H Coupé; Myra E van Linde; Annemarie Becker-Commissaris; Jaap C Reijneveld; Josée M Zijlstra; Dirkje W Sommeijer; Simone E J Eerenstein; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Daisy J M Ermers; Marit P H van Beuningen-van Wijk; Evi Peters Rit; Sonja C Stalpers-Konijnenburg; Diana G Taekema; Frank H Bosch; Yvonne Engels; Patricia J W B van Mierlo Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Johanna M C Broese; Rianne M J J van der Kleij; Els M L Verschuur; Huib A M Kerstjens; Yvonne Engels; Niels H Chavannes Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2021-03-26
Authors: Yvonne A C Bekker; Ankie F Suntjens; Y Engels; H Schers; Gert P Westert; A Stef Groenewoud Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Katharina van Baal; Birgitt Wiese; Gabriele Müller-Mundt; Stephanie Stiel; Nils Schneider; Kambiz Afshar Journal: BMC Prim Care Date: 2022-04-20