Literature DB >> 30534460

THE START-TO-RUN DISTANCE AND RUNNING-RELATED INJURY AMONG OBESE NOVICE RUNNERS: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL.

Michael Leibach Bertelsen1, Mette Hansen1, Sten Rasmussen, Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: High body mass index is associated with an increased risk of running-related injury among novice runners. However, the amount of running participation plays a fundamental explanatory role in regards to running-related injury development. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate if the risk of running-related injury among obese novice runners (BMI 30-35) was different when the start-to-run distance was 3km per week instead of 6km per week. HYPOTHESIS: A start-to-run distance of 3km per week is associated with 20% fewer running-related injuries and significantly fewer symptoms of overuse injury than a start-to-run distance of 6km per week among obese novice runners. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized trial.
METHODS: Fifty-six obese novice runners with a body mass index between 30-35 were enrolled and randomized to receive one of the two following Interventions: (i) a 4-week running program with a start-to-run distance of 3km per week including three sessions with 1km running per session (n=29), or (ii) a 4-week running program with a start-to-run distance of 6km per week including three sessions with 2km running per session (reference group, n=27). In both programs, the weekly running distance was increased by 10% each week throughout the follow-up.
RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed a protective cumulative risk difference of -16.3% (95%CI: -43.8%; 11.3%, p=0.25) after four weeks. Importantly, some participants completed much more running than prescribed (n=5) and some never uploaded any training (n=15). Therefore, a supplementary per-protocol analysis was performed revealing a cumulative risk difference of -31.2% (95%CI: -57.0%; -5.2%, p=0.02) after four weeks. Furthermore, in the per-protocol analysis, the cumulative risk difference of overuse-injury symptoms was -47.8% (95%CI: -81.0%; -14.6%, p=0.01) after four weeks of running.
CONCLUSIONS: A 3km reduction from 6km per week to 3km per week in the start-to-run distance appears to be associated with fewer running-related injuries and significantly fewer symptoms of overuse injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Movement System; Novice runner; Obese; Running; Running-related injury; Training dose

Year:  2018        PMID: 30534460      PMCID: PMC6253747     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  32 in total

1.  Prevalence of physical activity during leisure time in the European Union.

Authors:  M A Martínez-González; J J Varo; J L Santos; J De Irala; M Gibney; J Kearney; J A Martínez
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review.

Authors:  R N van Gent; D Siem; M van Middelkoop; A G van Os; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; B W Koes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  From control to causation: Validating a 'complex systems model' of running-related injury development and prevention.

Authors:  A Hulme; P M Salmon; R O Nielsen; G J M Read; C F Finch
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  High prevalence of overuse injury among iron-distance triathletes.

Authors:  Christian A Andersen; Ben Clarsen; Tone V Johansen; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand and American Heart Association. Recommendations for cardiovascular screening, staffing, and emergency policies at health/fitness facilities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Leisure-time running reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk.

Authors:  Duck-Chul Lee; Russell R Pate; Carl J Lavie; Xuemei Sui; Timothy S Church; Steven N Blair
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Short-Term Absenteeism and Health Care Utilization Due to Lower Extremity Injuries Among Novice Runners: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dirk-Wouter Smits; Bionka Huisstede; Evert Verhagen; Henk van der Worp; Bas Kluitenberg; Marienke van Middelkoop; Fred Hartgens; Frank Backx
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 8.  Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Habitual Running on Indices of Health in Physically Inactive Adults.

Authors:  Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior; Julian David Pillay; Willem van Mechelen; Evert Verhagen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Incidence of Running-Related Injuries Per 1000 h of running in Different Types of Runners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Solvej Videbæk; Andreas Moeballe Bueno; Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen; Sten Rasmussen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Predictors of Running-Related Injuries Among 930 Novice Runners: A 1-Year Prospective Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen; Ida Buist; Erik Thorlund Parner; Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Henrik Sørensen; Martin Lind; Sten Rasmussen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-02
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Running shoes for preventing lower limb running injuries in adults.

Authors:  Nicola Relph; Henrike Greaves; Ross Armstrong; Trevor D Prior; Sally Spencer; Ian B Griffiths; Paola Dey; Ben Langley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.