| Literature DB >> 30534238 |
Kenshi Yamanaga1, Kenichi Tsujita1, Hideki Shimomura2, Yuji Ogura2, Yuri Matsumuro2, Yoshiro Onoue2, Naomi Chazono2, Shogo Morisaki2, Naohiro Komura1, Kenji Sakamoto1, Koichi Kaikita1, Shinji Tayama1, Seiji Hokimoto1, Hisao Ogawa1.
Abstract
Although spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is one of the causes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or sudden cardiac death, its standard management, especially primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ACS patients with ongoing ischemia, has not been established. We experienced three ACS patients with SCAD who were treated with a different strategy of primary PCI. Each PCI strategy led to different clinical and procedural results. We describe here such PCI strategies and results, and also discuss the literature regarding primary PCI strategies for SCAD-induced ACS patients with ongoing ischemia. <Learning objective: SCAD is a cause of ACS. However, the treatment strategy of primary PCI for SCAD has not been fully investigated. We used different PCI strategies for three SCAD patients with ongoing ischemia. Our case series suggested that plain old balloon angioplasty is an acceptable option to avoid coronary stenting because the majority of patients were young menstruating women. Coronary vasospasm might be associated with SCAD. Treatment with vasodilators could be a potential pharmacological option for avoiding recurrence of SCAD.>.Entities:
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Plain old balloon angioplasty; Primary percutaneous coronary intervention; Spontaneous coronary artery dissection
Year: 2014 PMID: 30534238 PMCID: PMC6279686 DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2014.07.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiol Cases ISSN: 1878-5409