Literature DB >> 30533938

Closed Genome Sequences of Two Clostridium botulinum Strains Obtained by Nanopore Sequencing.

Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona1, Julie Haendiges1,2, Jesse D Miller2, Shashi K Sharma1.   

Abstract

Here we report the genome sequences of two toxin-producing Clostridium botulinum strains, one environmental sample (83F) and one clinical sample (CDC51232). The genomes were closed by a combination of long-read and short-read sequencing. The strains belong to C. botulinum sequence type 4 (ST4) and ST7, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30533938      PMCID: PMC6256530          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01075-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Clostridium botulinum is a Gram-positive, spore-forming anaerobic bacterium that produces botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) (1). Ingestion of the potent BoNT causes a serious paralytic illness known as botulism in humans and is a critical concern for food safety. The neurotoxins produced by these organisms are serologically different, and seven serotypes have been described, designated by the letters A through G (2). Four of the seven serotypes, namely, A, B, E, and F, have been linked with human botulism, with most cases due to serotypes A and B (3). The genomes of two bivalent toxin-producing C. botulinum strains (strains that carry two botulinum toxins) were sequenced to be prepared for botulism outbreaks. The strains were grown, and the DNA was extracted as reported previously (4). The long reads for each strain were generated with MinION sequencing (Nanopore, Oxford, UK). The sequencing libraries were prepared using the rapid sequencing kit RAD004 and run in a FLO-MIN106 (R9.4.1) flow cell, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, for 48 h at 230 to 290× average coverage. The sequencing library contained DNA fragmented randomly by a transposase present in the fragmentation mix of the RAD004 kit, rendering fragments of >30 kb. The short-read whole-genome sequence (WGS) for each strain was generated using the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform with the MiSeq v3 kit using 2 × 250-bp paired-end chemistry (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions at 160 to 180× coverage. The libraries were constructed with 100 ng of genomic DNA using the Nextera DNA flex kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The genome sequences for each strain were obtained by de novo assembly, using nanopore data and default settings within the Canu program v1.6 (5). A second assembly was generated using a SPAdes (6) hybrid assembly (with default settings) using both Nanopore and MiSeq data generated for each strain. The resultant assemblies from Canu were error corrected using the Pilon tool (7) and the MiSeq data. The final assembly (FA) was generated by comparing the SPAdes hybrid and Canu-polished assemblies using Mauve (8) and filling in the missing regions in the SPAdes assembly with the Canu-polished assembly. The FA sequences were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok). In silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analyses (https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_cbotulinum_seqdef&page=sequenceQuery) showed that CDC51232 belonged to sequence type 7 (ST7) and 83F belonged to ST4. Whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, performed as described previously (4), showed that these genomes belonged to two different lineages, with CDC51232 and 83F belonging to lineages 2 and 4, respectively, and contain mostly bivalent strains, as inferred from our previous study (4). Analysis of the resulting sequences showed the presence of two plasmids in each sequenced strain, although the sizes and sequences of these two plasmids differed greatly between each other (Table 1). Furthermore, although these two isolates were also bivalent C. botulinum strains, the location of the BoNT clusters differed between them. In strain CDC51232 the BoNT clusters (BoNTB and BoNTA4) were located in the larger plasmid, whereas in 83F, the BoNT clusters (BoNTB and BoNTA1) were located in the chromosome (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Metadata for the two C. botulinum strains reported in this study

CFSAN no.Isolate nameGenBank accession no. (size [bp])
Sequence Read Archive no.SourceSerotypeSequence type
ChromosomePlasmids
CFSAN034200CDC51232CP031095 (270,024)CP031096 (9,953)SRR7530166ClinicalAB7
CP031097 (3,922,194)SRR7530167
CFSAN03420283FCP031098 (3,954,901)CP031100 (57,676)SRR7532471EnvironmentalAB4
   CP031099 (5,926)SRR7532470   

The GC content for each strain was 28.2%.

Metadata for the two C. botulinum strains reported in this study The GC content for each strain was 28.2%.

Data availability.

The genome sequences of the two C. botulinum strains are listed in Table 1.
  8 in total

1.  Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements.

Authors:  Aaron C E Darling; Bob Mau; Frederick R Blattner; Nicole T Perna
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Gene arrangement in the upstream region of Clostridium botulinum type E and Clostridium butyricum BL6340 progenitor toxin genes is different from that of other types.

Authors:  T Kubota; N Yonekura; Y Hariya; E Isogai; H Isogai; K Amano; N Fujii
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Bacterial toxins: a table of lethal amounts.

Authors:  D M Gill
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1982-03

5.  Whole-genome single-nucleotide-polymorphism analysis for discrimination of Clostridium botulinum group I strains.

Authors:  Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona; Ruth Timme; Brian H Raphael; Donald Zink; Shashi K Sharma
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Botulism in the United States: a clinical and epidemiologic review.

Authors:  R L Shapiro; C Hatheway; D L Swerdlow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement.

Authors:  Bruce J Walker; Thomas Abeel; Terrance Shea; Margaret Priest; Amr Abouelliel; Sharadha Sakthikumar; Christina A Cuomo; Qiandong Zeng; Jennifer Wortman; Sarah K Young; Ashlee M Earl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation.

Authors:  Sergey Koren; Brian P Walenz; Konstantin Berlin; Jason R Miller; Nicholas H Bergman; Adam M Phillippy
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 9.043

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation and Optimization of Microdrop Digital PCR for Detection of Serotype A and B Clostridium botulinum.

Authors:  Pengya Gao; Changde Wu; Jin Zhang; Shuping Wang; Ying Huang; Yinping Dong; Tingting Liu; Changyun Ye; Xuefang Xu; Wenwen Xin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Genomic Comparison of Eight Closed Genomes of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Strains Isolated From Broiler Farms and Processing Plants in Trinidad and Tobago.

Authors:  Meghan Maguire; Anisa S Khan; Abiodun A Adesiyun; Karla Georges; Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Closing Clostridium botulinum Group I Genomes Using a Combination of Short- and Long-Reads.

Authors:  Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona; Shashi K Sharma
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.