Literature DB >> 30533921

Draft Genome Sequence of Mycobacterium parafortuitum Strain P7335.

Jamal Saad1, Anthony Levasseur1, Michel Drancourt1.   

Abstract

Mycobacterium parafortuitum is a rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacterium, initially isolated from soil in Japan. The 6,175,772-bp draft genome sequence of M. parafortuitum strain P7335 exhibits a G+C content of 68.4%, 5,783 protein-coding genes, and 66 predicted RNA genes, including 59 tRNA genes, 6 rRNA operons, and 1 transfer-messenger RNA.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30533921      PMCID: PMC6256513          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00950-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

The rapidly growing nontuberculous Mycobacterium parafortuitum, initially isolated from soil in Japan (1, 2), has been further isolated from water (3), nasal exudates of bovines (4), and patient sputum (5). However, M. parafortuitum is not considered a pathogenic species (6, 7). A so-called M. parafortuitum complex was initially defined on the basis of phenotypic characteristics shared by several species (5, 8) comprising Mycobacterium neoaurum (9, 10), Mycobacterium hodleri (11), Mycobacterium aurum, Mycobacterium vaccae, Mycobacterium diernhoferi, Mycobacterium austroafricanum (5), and Mycobacterium frederiksbergense (12). This classification along with the validity of some of these species was then challenged by experimental DNA-DNA hybridization studies (13). In order to further contribute to the delineation of the so-called M. parafortuitum complex, we sequenced the genome of M. parafortuitum strain P7335 after it was cultured for 7 days at 37°C on Middlebrook 7H10 agar supplemented with 10% oleic albumin dextrose catalase (OADC) (Becton, Dickinson, Sparks, USA) under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. DNA was extracted using InstaGene matrix (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France), and 0.2 µg/µl DNA was sequenced with the MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Seven runs were made with read lengths of 2 × 250 bp over 39 h. Two banks were prepared in the mate-paired format, one with inserts of 13 kb and one with inserts of 5 kb, and one bank was prepared in the paired-end format. A total of 10,804,432 reads were filtered per read qualities and assembled to reach a depth of 47-fold mean coverage by using SPAdes software (14). Contigs were combined by using SSPACE (15), GapFiller (16), and manual finishing using similarity searches and synteny block detection. The M. parafortuitum strain P7335 genome contains eight scaffolds, 6,175,772 bp, and a G+C content of 68.4%. Annotation using Prokka version 1.12 (17) yielded 5,783 protein-coding genes and 66 predicted RNA genes, including 59 tRNA genes, 6 rRNA operons, and 1 transfer-messenger RNA. Analysis using MetaPhinder-2.1 (18) showed the presence of a 5,420-bp prophage sequence exhibiting 97.9% average nucleotide identity (ANI) similarity with the enterobacterial phage phiX174 (GenBank accession number CP004084); however, its PCR amplification using primers 5’-CCCGACTGCCTATGATGTTTA-3’ (forward) and 3’-CATCTCGGCAATCTCTTTCTG-5’ (reverse) designed in this study failed, illustrating the instability of this prophage. Further in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (19) with reference genomes selected according to 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequence similarity (5, 20) and measured using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) version 2.1 (21) are presented in Table 1. In addition, the estimation of the degree of genomic similarity of strains using OrthoANI software (22) yielded ANIs ranging from 99.99% to 80.54% with M. parafortuitum CCUG 20999, M. austroafricanum, M. vanbaalenii, M. gilvum, and M. vaccae and only 76.14% to 78.05% with the other species of the M. parafortuitum complex. These in silico genomic data agree with previously published experimental data (13), confirming the inconsistency of the so-called M. parafortuitum complex. As a consequence, the taxonomic positions of M. aurum, M. neoaurum, and M. diernhoferi need to be reevaluated.
TABLE 1

Comparison of M. parafortuitum P7335 with reference Mycobacterium species using GGDC, formula 2

Comparative genome sequence (GenBank or NCBI RefSeq no.)ReferenceDDHa +/− SD
M. parafortuitum (MVID00000000)2398.4 ± 1.3
M. gilvum (NC_009338)2426.5 ± 4.9
M. vanbaalenii (NC_008726)25 ± 4.8
M. vaccae (NZ_CP011491)2524.8 ± 4.8
M. austroafricanum (NZ_CCAW000000000)2624.9 ± 4.8
M. chubuense (NC_018027)2723.1 ± 4.8
M. obuense (NZ_JYNU00000000)2822.1 ± 4.7
M. rutilum (NZ_LT629971)21.8 ± 4.7
M. diernhoferi (MPNS00000000)20.9 ± 4.7
M. aurum (NZ_LT549889)20.9 ± 4.6
M. rhodesiae (NC_016604)20.5 ± 4.7
M. neoaurum (NC_023036)2920.3 ± 4.7
M. litorale (NZ_CP019882)20.3 ± 4.6

DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) estimates are based on identities/genome lengths.

Comparison of M. parafortuitum P7335 with reference Mycobacterium species using GGDC, formula 2 DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) estimates are based on identities/genome lengths.

Data availability.

The draft genome sequence of M. parafortuitum strain P7335 has been deposited at EBI/GenBank under the accession numbers UEGS01000001 to UEGS01000008 .
  28 in total

1.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Mycobacterium frederiksbergense sp. nov., a novel polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading Mycobacterium species.

Authors:  P Willumsen; U Karlson; E Stackebrandt; R M Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Mycobacterium parafortuitum: a new species.

Authors:  M Tsukamura
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1966-01

4.  Complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium vaccae type strain ATCC 25954.

Authors:  Yung S Ho; Sabir A Adroub; Maram Abadi; Bader Al Alwan; Reham Alkhateeb; Ge Gao; Alaa Ragab; Shahjahan Ali; Dick van Soolingen; Wilbert Bitter; Arnab Pain; Abdallah M Abdallah
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller.

Authors:  Marten Boetzer; Walter Pirovano
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison.

Authors:  Alexander F Auch; Mathias von Jan; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-01-28

7.  Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria in South African Wildlife: Neglected Pathogens and Potential Impediments for Bovine Tuberculosis Diagnosis.

Authors:  Nomakorinte Gcebe; Tiny M Hlokwe
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium Species of Public Health and Veterinary Importance from Cattle in the South State of México.

Authors:  Adrian Zaragoza Bastida; Nallely Rivero Pérez; Benjamín Valladares Carranza; Keila Isaac-Olivé; Pablo Moreno Pérez; Horacio Sandoval Trujillo; Ninfa Ramírez Durán
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Occurrence of mycobacteria in bovine milk samples from both individual and collective bulk tanks at farms and informal markets in the southeast region of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Marília Masello Junqueira Franco; Antonio Carlos Paes; Márcio Garcia Ribeiro; José Carlos de Figueiredo Pantoja; Adolfo Carlos Barreto Santos; Marcelo Miyata; Clarice Queico Fujimura Leite; Rodrigo Garcia Motta; Fernando José Paganini Listoni
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  MetaPhinder-Identifying Bacteriophage Sequences in Metagenomic Data Sets.

Authors:  Vanessa Isabell Jurtz; Julia Villarroel; Ole Lund; Mette Voldby Larsen; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bloodstream Infections With a Novel Nontuberculous Mycobacterium Involving 52 Outpatient Oncology Clinic Patients-Arkansas, 2018.

Authors:  Sarah M Labuda; Kelley Garner; Michael Cima; Heather Moulton-Meissner; Alison Laufer Halpin; Nadege Charles-Toney; Peter Yu; Erin Bolton; Reid Pierce; Matthew B Crist; Danica Gomes; Paige Gable; Gillian McAllister; Adrian Lawsin; Hollis Houston; Naveen Patil; J Gary Wheeler; Robert Bradsher; Keyur Vyas; Dirk Haselow
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 9.079

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.