Literature DB >> 30533813

Whole-Genome Sequences of Propionibacterium australiense NML (LCDC) 98A072T and NML (LCDC) 98A078, Associated with Granulomatous Bovine Lesions.

Anne-Marie Bernier1, Kathryn Bernard2,3.   

Abstract

Draft genome sequences of Propionibacterium australiense isolates NML 98A072T and NML 98A078, derived from granulomatous lesions of infected bovines, were assembled and studied. Respectively, the genome sizes were 2.99 and 3.01 Mb, with G+C contents of 68.4% and 68.5%.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30533813      PMCID: PMC6256612          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01445-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

In 2000, Forbes-Faulkner et al. described a novel granulomatous infection in cattle that was associated with an unidentifiable Propionibacterium-like organism (1). Propionibacterium australiense sp. nov. was subsequently described as this novel bovine pathogen (2). Here, we have characterized draft genome sequences for two P. australiense strains, NML/LCDC 98A072T (= ATCC BAA-264T = CCUG 46075T) and NML/LCDC 98A078 (= ATCC BAA-263 = CCUG 46174). Identifiers using NML (National Microbiology Laboratory) or the older acronym LCDC (Laboratory Centre for Disease Control) are to be considered synonyms. Bacteria were subcultured after storage at −80°C in Microbank vials (Pro-Lab) from NML stocks and passed twice at 35°C on Brucella blood agar plates (BBA; Thermo Fisher) for 48 h under anaerobic conditions in a jar containing a GasPak (BD). A loopful of plate culture was passed and grown anaerobically in prereduced peptone-yeast extract broth (Anaerobe Systems) for 18 h at 35°C. DNA was extracted using a DNA minikit (Qiagen), and paired-end whole-genome shotgun libraries were constructed using a Nextera XT library preparation kit. Samples were run separately for sequencing on the MiSeq 600-cycle kit (version 3) on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina). Read quality was assessed with FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and assembled using default settings of SPAdes (version 3.9.0 [3]) after merging short paired-end reads with Fast-Length Adjustment of Short Reads (FLASH) with default settings (4). The genomes were compared to each other using JSpeciesWS to calculate the average nucleotide identity values using BLAST+ (ANIb) (5). With that approach, 98A072T and 98A078 had ANIb scores more than 99.6% similar to each other but only 73.56% to 84.11% similar to genomes from Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. freudenreichii DSM 20271T (GenBank accession number CP010341) and Propionibacterium acidifaciens DSM 21887T (GenBank accession number AUFR00000000), species selected from the genus Propionibacterium after emendation in 2016 (6). The genome-to-genome distance calculator (7) was used to estimate in silico DNA-DNA hybridization values between strains. The two NML strains were found to have 97.6% similarity to each other using the recommended formula 2 for draft genomes, but values were low (∼20%) when compared to those of P. freudenreichii subsp. freudenreichii DSM 20271T. The sequencing run for NML 98A072 produced 462,927 sequences of 35 to 301 bases in length, with a total of 136,192,279 bases. The draft genome of NML98A072T was comprised of 2,996,433 bp, which assembled into 63 contigs with 82× coverage, a G+C content of 68.4%, and an N50 contig length of 138,977. The genome, annotated by Prokka (version 1.13) (8), coded for 2,578 proteins, of which 85% were assigned to Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) categories using eggNOG-mapper (9). This genome encoded 3 rRNA genes, 51 tRNAs, and 9 repeat CRISPR elements. The sequencing run for NML 98A078 produced 408,707 sequencing reads (lengths of 35 to 301 bases), with a total of 113,773,758 bases. The draft genome of NML 98A078 consisted of 3,016,395 bp, assembled into 63 contigs with 64× coverage, a G+C content of 68.5%, and an N50 contig length of 129,689. eggNOG-mapper assigned 83.5% of the 2,644 coding regions to COG categories, and the draft genome encoded 3 rRNA genes, 51 tRNAs, and 4 CRISPR repeats. Neither genome harbored intact phages, as evaluated using PHASTER (10). The G+C contents of the draft genomes were consistent with members of the emended genus Propionibacterium (6, 11).

Data availability.

Raw reads for these projects were assigned accession numbers SRX4875582 and SRX4875583 in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive. Draft genome sequences of Propionibacterium australiense 98A072T and 98A078 were deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers RCIV00000000 and RCIW00000000, and the versions described in this paper are RCIV01000000 and RCIW01000000.
  10 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies.

Authors:  Tanja Magoč; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The natural history of cutaneous propionibacteria, and reclassification of selected species within the genus Propionibacterium to the proposed novel genera Acidipropionibacterium gen. nov., Cutibacterium gen. nov. and Pseudopropionibacterium gen. nov.

Authors:  Christian F P Scholz; Mogens Kilian
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Novel Propionibacterium infection in cattle.

Authors:  J C Forbes-Faulkner; D Pitt; J H Norton; A D Thomas; K Bernard
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions.

Authors:  Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Alexander F Auch; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Fast Genome-Wide Functional Annotation through Orthology Assignment by eggNOG-Mapper.

Authors:  Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Kristoffer Forslund; Luis Pedro Coelho; Damian Szklarczyk; Lars Juhl Jensen; Christian von Mering; Peer Bork
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Complete genome sequence of Propionibacterium freudenreichii DSM 20271(T).

Authors:  Patrik Koskinen; Paulina Deptula; Olli-Pekka Smolander; Fitsum Tamene; Juhana Kammonen; Kirsi Savijoki; Lars Paulin; Vieno Piironen; Petri Auvinen; Pekka Varmanen
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-10-24

9.  PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool.

Authors:  David Arndt; Jason R Grant; Ana Marcu; Tanvir Sajed; Allison Pon; Yongjie Liang; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison.

Authors:  Michael Richter; Ramon Rosselló-Móra; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Jörg Peplies
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 6.937

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Pan-Genome Guided Metabolic Network Reconstruction of Five Propionibacterium Species Reveals Extensive Metabolic Diversity.

Authors:  Tim McCubbin; R Axayacatl Gonzalez-Garcia; Robin W Palfreyman; Chris Stowers; Lars K Nielsen; Esteban Marcellin
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.096

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.