Literature DB >> 30533783

Draft Genome Sequences of the Type Strains of Three Clavibacter Subspecies and Atypical Peach-Colored Strains Isolated from Tomato.

Ebrahim Osdaghi1, Perrine Portier2,3, Martial Briand2, Géraldine Taghouti2,3, Marie-Agnes Jacques2.   

Abstract

Here, we present the draft genome sequences of 10 Clavibacter sp. strains, including the type strains of different subspecies of Clavibacter michiganensis and a potentially novel species within the genus. Genome lengths of the strains varied between 2,982,864 and 3,288,331 bp, with G+C contents of 72.23 to 73.50%.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30533783      PMCID: PMC6256548          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01357-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Clavibacter (Microbacteriaceae) comprises Gram-positive actinobacteria, most of which are pathogenic on agriculturally important crops (1). Traditionally, the genus Clavibacter has been considered to include only one species, Clavibacter michiganensis, comprising five plant-pathogenic subspecies, i.e., C. michiganensis subsp. insidiosus, C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, C. michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis, C. michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus, and C. michiganensis subsp. tessellarius (2). Recently, plant-associated but nonpathogenic members of C. michiganensis were assigned to new subspecies, including C. michiganensis subsp. californiensis and C. michiganensis subsp. chilensis (3). Additionally, C. michiganensis subsp. phaseoli and C. michiganensis subsp. capsici were identified as the causal agents of bacterial bean leaf yellowing and bacterial canker of pepper, respectively (4, 5). On the other hand, peach color-pigmented nonpathogenic Clavibacter sp. strains were isolated from tomato phyllosphere and remain to be taxonomically evaluated (6, 7). Recently, a reclassification of C. michiganensis members into two new species and three new combinations was proposed (8). However, due to the lack of genomic information from every newly identified subspecies, further investigations are warranted to clarify the taxonomy of Clavibacter spp. Here, we present the draft genome sequences of 10 Clavibacter species strains (Table 1), including the type strains of C. michiganensis subsp. californiensis (CFBP 8216), C. michiganensis subsp. chilensis (CFBP 8217), and C. michiganensis subsp. phaseoli (CFBP 8627), as well as the atypical peach-colored strains (CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616) isolated from tomato in Iran (6, 7). The strains CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616 resulted from the screening of microbial communities associated with tomato plants at Shiraz University in Iran (7, 9) and were isolated from asymptomatic tomato leaves on yeast extract-peptone-glucose agar (YPGA) medium as previously described (6), whereas the remaining eight strains were provided by CIRM-CFBP in France (2).
TABLE 1

Source, place, and date of isolation, as well as genome information, for each Clavibacter species strain used in this study

NomenclatureCIRM-CFBPa codeHost of isolationYr of isolationCountry of isolationGenome information
Accession no.
Referenceor source
G+C content (%)Genome length (bp)No. of contigsSequencing coverage (×)No. of protein-coding genesNo. of RNA genesNo. of pseudogenesDDBJ/ENA/GenBankSequence Read Archive
RunExpt
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. insidiosusCFBP 1195Medicago sativa1964United Kingdom72.843,203,4708054503,33352199QWDZ01000000SRR7977544SRX481032616
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. insidiosusCFBP 6488Medicago sativa1998Czech Republic72.233,225,7291,8924353,89052329QWEA01000000SRR7977605SRX48103812
Clavibacter michiganensisCFBP 7491Solanum lycopersicumNDbND73.023,288,3319214753,56051122QWEB01000000SRR7977581SRX4810357This study
Clavibacter michiganensisCFBP 7493Solanum lycopersicum NDND72.913,275,8847825703,4875191QWEC01000000SRR7977687SRX4810463This study
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensisCFBP 7577Zea maysNDND72.752,982,8641,2735103,29153373QWED01000000SRR7977688SRX48104642
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. californiensisCFBP 8216TSolanum lycopersicum 2000United States (Hawaii)72.713,193,4158115153,36751105QWEE01000000SRR7983517SRX48147863
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. chilensisCFBP 8217TSolanum lycopersicum 2007Netherlands73.503,044,8071,0024503,35654114QWGS01000000SRR7983516SRX48147853
Clavibacter spp.CFBP 8615Solanum lycopersicum 2015Iran73.233,129,0976205803,2365078QWGT01000000SRR7983538SRX48148076
CFBP 8616Solanum lycopersicum 2015Iran73.153,094,6869615553,34250151QWGU01000000SRR7983541SRX48148096
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. phaseoliCFBP 8627TPhaseolus vulgaris2009Spain73.463,052,0981,0094603,28953205QWGV01000000SRR7983540SRX48148084

CIRM-CFBP, International Center for Microbial Resources—French Collection of Plant-Associated Bacteria, IRHS UMR 1345 INRA-ACO-UA, Beaucouzé, France (https://www6.inra.fr/cirm_eng/CFBP-Plant-Associated-Bacteria).

ND, not determined.

Source, place, and date of isolation, as well as genome information, for each Clavibacter species strain used in this study CIRM-CFBP, International Center for Microbial Resources—French Collection of Plant-Associated Bacteria, IRHS UMR 1345 INRA-ACO-UA, Beaucouzé, France (https://www6.inra.fr/cirm_eng/CFBP-Plant-Associated-Bacteria). ND, not determined. The Clavibacter sp. strains (Table 1) were grown on YPGA medium as previously described (2), and DNAs were extracted using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison WI). The DNAs were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq X platform at BGI Tech Solutions (Hong Kong), and the shotgun sequencing yielded 150-bp paired-end reads. A combination of Velvet (v 1.2.10), SOAPdenovo (v 2.04), and SOAPGapCloser (v 1.12) platforms (10, 11) was used for genome assembly. The genomes were assembled using the same strategy and the default settings of the platforms. In brief, different values of kmers were tested to obtain a preassembly with SOAPdenovo. Then, the resulting preassemblies were treated as long reads and introduced in Velvet to obtain final assemblies. Libraries were prepared using 170 to 800 bp. For each strain, genome length (bp) and G+C content (%) are summarized in Table 1. Additionally, genome annotation was performed using the GeneMarkS+ (v 4.6) suite implemented in the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline with default settings (12). Total numbers of protein-coding genes, RNA genes, and pseudogenes were determined for all the genomes, as shown in Table 1. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis using the JSpeciesWS Web server (13) showed that the atypical peach-colored strains CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616 have only 89.00 to 93.00% sequence identity with the type strains of previously identified and/or newly introduced Clavibacter species/subspecies. These ANI values are far below the accepted threshold (95 to 96%) for the definition of prokaryotic species (14), suggesting that the strains CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616 could be defined as a new species. A comprehensive multiphasic taxonomic study using the genome sequences provided in this study to reevaluate the taxonomy of Clavibacter spp. and clarify the position of the strains CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616 within the genus is ongoing.

Data availability.

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers shown in Table 1. For all sequences, the first versions of the accession numbers are described in this paper. The raw reads of the sequences of all strains were submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (15), and the corresponding accession numbers are shown in Table 1. All of the strains listed in Table 1 are available at CIRM-CFBP, the French Collection of Plant-Associated Bacteria (http://www6.inra.fr/cirm_eng/CFBP-Plant-Associated-Bacteria).
  11 in total

1.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes.

Authors:  Mincheol Kim; Hyun-Seok Oh; Sang-Cheol Park; Jongsik Chun
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Gene identification in prokaryotic genomes, phages, metagenomes, and EST sequences with GeneMarkS suite.

Authors:  Mark Borodovsky; Alex Lomsadze
Journal:  Curr Protoc Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-06

4.  Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. capsici subsp. nov., causing bacterial canker disease in pepper.

Authors:  Eom-Ji Oh; Chungyun Bae; Han-Beoyl Lee; In Sun Hwang; Hyok-In Lee; Mi Chi Yea; Kyu-Ock Yim; Seungdon Lee; Sunggi Heu; Jae-Soon Cha; Chang-Sik Oh
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. phaseoli subsp. nov., pathogenic in bean.

Authors:  Ana J González; Estefanía Trapiello
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Seed-associated subspecies of the genus Clavibacter are clearly distinguishable from Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis.

Authors:  Jarred Yasuhara-Bell; Anne M Alvarez
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Phylogenetic analysis and polyphasic characterization of Clavibacter michiganensis strains isolated from tomato seeds reveal that nonpathogenic strains are distinct from C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis.

Authors:  Marie-Agnès Jacques; Karine Durand; Geoffrey Orgeur; Samuel Balidas; Céline Fricot; Sophie Bonneau; Anne Quillévéré; Corinne Audusseau; Valérie Olivier; Valérie Grimault; René Mathis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Re-classification of Clavibacter michiganensis subspecies on the basis of whole-genome and multi-locus sequence analyses.

Authors:  Xiang Li; James Tambong; Kat Xiaoli Yuan; Wen Chen; Huimin Xu; C André Lévesque; Solke H De Boer
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison.

Authors:  Michael Richter; Ramon Rosselló-Móra; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Jörg Peplies
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetic Analyses Suggest Several Novel Species within the Genus Clavibacter, Including Nonpathogenic Tomato-Associated Strains.

Authors:  Ebrahim Osdaghi; Touraj Rahimi; S Mohsen Taghavi; Maryam Ansari; Sadegh Zarei; Perrine Portier; Martial Briand; Marie-Agnes Jacques
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Multiple Introductions of Tomato Pathogen Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis into Iran as Revealed by a Global-Scale Phylogeographic Analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Ansari; S Mohsen Taghavi; Habiballah Hamzehzarghani; Miryam Valenzuela; María Ines Siri; Ebrahim Osdaghi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bacterial ring rot of potato caused by Clavibacter sepedonicus: A successful example of defeating the enemy under international regulations.

Authors:  Ebrahim Osdaghi; Jan M van der Wolf; Hamid Abachi; Xiang Li; Solke H De Boer; Carol A Ishimaru
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.520

4.  Bacterial wilt of dry beans caused by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens: A new threat from an old enemy.

Authors:  Ebrahim Osdaghi; Anthony J Young; Robert M Harveson
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.663

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.