Literature DB >> 30533654

Draft Genome Sequence of the Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolate TUEPA7472.

Henrike Miess1, Ghazaleh Jahanshah1,2, Heike Brötz-Oesterhelt2,3, Matthias Willmann2,4, Silke Peter2,4, Harald Gross1,2.   

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa TUEPA7472 is extensively drug resistant (XDR) and is a representative Gram-negative rod that is multiresistant toward 4 classes of clinically relevant antibiotics (4MRGN). The 6.8-Mb draft genome sequence of this strain provides insight into these resistance mechanisms and the potential of the strain to produce virulence factors.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30533654      PMCID: PMC6256677          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01055-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that causes morbidity and mortality in humans with compromised natural defenses, and it is most prevalent among hospitalized patients with burn wounds, cystic fibrosis (1, 2), cancer, AIDS, or catheter treatment. The production of virulence factors (3, 4), biofilm formation (5), and its metabolic versatility allow for establishment and promotion of infection, while its intrinsic and recent emerging resistance to multiple antibiotics (6) makes treatment challenging. Strain TUEPA7472 was recovered from a blood culture specimen at the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene in Tübingen, Germany. The isolate was resistant toward beta-lactams (piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, aztreonam, and meropenem), aminoglycosides (amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin), and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) but remained susceptible toward colistin. Notably, the strain remained susceptible toward ceftazidime. Based on this antimicrobial susceptibility pattern, the strain can be classified as an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacterium (7) or, according to the current German national guideline (8, 9), as 4MRGN (multiresistant Gram-negative rod resistant toward 4 classes of clinically relevant antibiotics). Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from 15 ml of an overnight culture grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 30°C using the genomic DNA purification kit in combination with 100/G Genomic-tips (Qiagen), following the manufacturer´s protocol, except that the volumes handled in the first two steps were doubled. Aliquots were used to construct PacBio (2-kb insert size) and Illumina (TruSeq PCR-free kit) libraries. Sequencing on a PacBio RS II instrument yielded 113,538 subreads (142× coverage), with an N50 value of 12,864 bp, from two single-molecule real-time (SMRT) cells, while the 2 × 150-bp Illumina HiSeqX run produced 118,026,712 total reads (2,552× coverage), with a median length of 415 bp. The Illumina reads were filtered using BBDuk (BBMap suite version 36.77), and high-quality reads were subsequently assembled into contigs employing ABySS version 2.0.2 (10). The contigs were linked and placed into superscaffolds based on the alignment of the PacBio continuous long reads using BLASR (11) and SSPACE version 1.0 (12). Gapped regions within the superscaffolds were closed or reduced using the Illumina reads and GapFiller 1.10 (13). Finally, assembly errors and the nucleotide disagreements between the Illumina reads and scaffold sequences were corrected using Pilon version 1.21 (14). Software parameter settings were kept at the defaults. Overall, the hybrid de novo assembly resulted in a 6,806,824-bp nucleotide draft with a G+C content of 66.2%, which consisted of 18 scaffolds representing one chromosome. One scaffold had a single additional gap that was estimated to be 629 bp. The assembled contigs were annotated with the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (15), resulting in the annotation of 6,403 coding sequences. Automated bioinformatics analyses (16, 17) predicted 12 biosynthetic gene clusters coding for secondary metabolites. Six of these matched known clusters for pyoverdin, a pyrrolizidine, pyochelin, pyocyanin, 2× homoserine-lactone, and 2-amino-4-methoxy-trans-3-butenoic acid. The remaining clusters were predicted to encode 1 nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), 1 hybrid NRPS-polyketide synthase (NRPS-PKS), and 3 ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptide (RiPP)-based compounds. By using ResFinder 3.0 (18), several antibiotic resistance genes were found in this genome, including the beta-lactamase resistance genes blaPAO and blaOXA-50, the aminoglycoside resistance gene aph(3′)-IIb, the fluoroquinolone resistance gene crpP, and the fosfomycin resistance gene fosA.

Data availability.

This whole-genome sequencing (WGS) project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number QOLE00000000. The version described in this paper is version QOLE01000000. The sequencing reads have been deposited under the accession number SRP156998. All reads have been deposited to the SRA and are associated with BioProject number PRJNA475453.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Establishment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: lessons from a versatile opportunist.

Authors:  J B Lyczak; C L Cannon; G B Pier
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.700

2.  [Hygiene measures for infection or colonization with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Commission recommendation for hospital hygiene and infection prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa: all roads lead to resistance.

Authors:  Elena B M Breidenstein; César de la Fuente-Núñez; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses.

Authors:  Shaan L Gellatly; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.166

5.  Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes.

Authors:  Ea Zankari; Henrik Hasman; Salvatore Cosentino; Martin Vestergaard; Simon Rasmussen; Ole Lund; Frank M Aarestrup; Mette Voldby Larsen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller.

Authors:  Marten Boetzer; Walter Pirovano
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement.

Authors:  Bruce J Walker; Thomas Abeel; Terrance Shea; Margaret Priest; Amr Abouelliel; Sharadha Sakthikumar; Christina A Cuomo; Qiandong Zeng; Jennifer Wortman; Sarah K Young; Ashlee M Earl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  antiSMASH 4.0-improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification.

Authors:  Kai Blin; Thomas Wolf; Marc G Chevrette; Xiaowen Lu; Christopher J Schwalen; Satria A Kautsar; Hernando G Suarez Duran; Emmanuel L C de Los Santos; Hyun Uk Kim; Mariana Nave; Jeroen S Dickschat; Douglas A Mitchell; Ekaterina Shelest; Rainer Breitling; Eriko Takano; Sang Yup Lee; Tilmann Weber; Marnix H Medema
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence.

Authors:  M Fata Moradali; Shirin Ghods; Bernd H A Rehm
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.