Literature DB >> 30533616

Genome Sequence of the Probiotic Strain Bacillus velezensis Variant polyfermenticus GF423.

Haeyoung Jeong1, JungAe Kim1, Soo-Keun Choi1, Jae-Gu Pan1.   

Abstract

The genome sequence of the commercial probiotic strain "Bacillus polyfermenticus" GF423 was determined. Comparison of the 4.1-Mb genome sequence revealed Bacillus velezensis FZB42 as its closest relative. Based on the genome sequence, we propose that this probiotic strain be renamed Bacillus velezensis variant polyfermenticus.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30533616      PMCID: PMC6256592          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01000-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Strains belonging to “Bacillus polyfermenticus” have long been used in Japan and the Republic of Korea for the treatment of intestinal disorders, and the immunomodulatory effects of these strains on human subjects have been demonstrated (1). At least two strains, SCD (KCCM 10104, also known as B. polyfermenticus n.sp. in the Korean Pharmacopoeia) (2, 3) and KJS-2 (4), were identified from their distinctive physiological properties. Strain SCD and its derivatives, such as KD21 (KFCC 11090) and KD33, are widely used for the development of enhanced probiotic products in academic research and in pharmaceutical companies in the Republic of Korea. Despite its importance in biomedical applications, Bacillus polyfermenticus is yet to appear in the Prokaryotic Nomenclature Up-to-Date database (https://www.dsmz.de/bacterial-diversity/prokaryotic-nomenclature-up-to-date), and genome-based analysis has not been performed for any of these strains. Here, Bacillus polyfermenticus n.sp. was isolated from a Biscan G capsule (Binex Co., Ltd., Busan, Republic of Korea) and renamed GF423, and genome sequencing was carried out using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Bacterial culturing, library construction, and genome sequencing were carried out as described previously (5). A total of 2.23 Gb of reads (2 × 101 cycles) were trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.32 (6) with SLIDINGWINDOW:4:20, MINLEN 75, and all other parameters being adopted from those used in the trimming section of A5-miseq version 20150522 (7), and 20-mer nucleotides below the abundance cutoff value of 50 were filtered out from the reads using khmer version 2.0 (8) to minimize contamination in the reads. De novo assembly using the CLC Genomics Workbench version 8.5.1 (Qiagen) with a word size of 64 yielded 33 contigs totaling 4,112,512 bp (47.95% G+C content). The N50 value and the largest contig length were 502,810 bp and 618,700 bp, respectively. Genome annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (9) and the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server (10). We calculated overall genome-related indices using dRep version 2.0.5 (11) to investigate genomic relatedness to strains in the Bacillus subtilis species complex. The results revealed a tight cluster with strains belonging to the species Bacillus velezensis, with >98% genome-wide average nucleotide identity (gANI), including with the type strain NRRL B-41580 (GenBank accession no. LLZC00000000). Based on this result, we propose that B. polyfermenticus probiotic strains be renamed B. velezensis variant polyfermenticus. We suggest that “variant polyfermenticus” be added to reflect the history of strain usage in over-the-counter drugs as well as probiotics. In particular, the strain is most closely related to B. velezensis FZB42 (GenBank accession no. CP000560; 98.7% gANI and 89.0% digital DNA-DNA hybridization, the latter of which was calculated using Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator version 2.1, available at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/distcalc2.php), which was formerly designated the type strain of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum (12) but recently recognized as synonymous with B. velezensis (13, 14). Nucleotide sequences in GenBank, especially those from Bacillus polyfermenticus 16S ribosomal genes, should thus be reevaluated to avoid misleading strain identification. One of the physiological characteristics of B. polyfermenticus that distinguishes it from B. subtilis is its capacity to produce acids from lactose but not from d-turanose (2), which was also observed from the type strain of B. velezensis (15). Additionally, this strain has the ability to ferment glucose to lactic acid (4). Our results emphasize the importance of genome sequence information for accurate species identification and elucidation of physiological characteristics of bacterial strains.

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession no. QOHQ00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, QOHQ01000000.
  13 in total

1.  A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data.

Authors:  David Coil; Guillaume Jospin; Aaron E Darling
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication.

Authors:  Matthew R Olm; Christopher T Brown; Brandon Brooks; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Bacillus velezensis sp. nov., a surfactant-producing bacterium isolated from the river Vélez in Málaga, southern Spain.

Authors:  Cristina Ruiz-García; Victoria Béjar; Fernando Martínez-Checa; Inmaculada Llamas; Emilia Quesada
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Relationship of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens clades associated with strains DSM 7T and FZB42T: a proposal for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens subsp. nov. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum subsp. nov. based on complete genome sequence comparisons.

Authors:  Rainer Borriss; Xiao-Hua Chen; Christian Rueckert; Jochen Blom; Anke Becker; Birgit Baumgarth; Ben Fan; Rüdiger Pukall; Peter Schumann; Cathrin Spröer; Helmut Junge; Joachim Vater; Alfred Pühler; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Partial characterization of polyfermenticin SCD, a newly identified bacteriocin of Bacillus polyfermenticus.

Authors:  K H Lee; K D Jun; W S Kim; H D Paik
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Bacillus velezensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Bacillus methylotrophicus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and 'Bacillus oryzicola' are later heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus velezensis based on phylogenomics.

Authors:  Christopher A Dunlap; Soo-Jin Kim; Soon-Wo Kwon; Alejandro P Rooney
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  The khmer software package: enabling efficient nucleotide sequence analysis.

Authors:  Michael R Crusoe; Hussien F Alameldin; Sherine Awad; Elmar Boucher; Adam Caldwell; Reed Cartwright; Amanda Charbonneau; Bede Constantinides; Greg Edvenson; Scott Fay; Jacob Fenton; Thomas Fenzl; Jordan Fish; Leonor Garcia-Gutierrez; Phillip Garland; Jonathan Gluck; Iván González; Sarah Guermond; Jiarong Guo; Aditi Gupta; Joshua R Herr; Adina Howe; Alex Hyer; Andreas Härpfer; Luiz Irber; Rhys Kidd; David Lin; Justin Lippi; Tamer Mansour; Pamela McA'Nulty; Eric McDonald; Jessica Mizzi; Kevin D Murray; Joshua R Nahum; Kaben Nanlohy; Alexander Johan Nederbragt; Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga; Jeramia Ory; Jason Pell; Charles Pepe-Ranney; Zachary N Russ; Erich Schwarz; Camille Scott; Josiah Seaman; Scott Sievert; Jared Simpson; Connor T Skennerton; James Spencer; Ramakrishnan Srinivasan; Daniel Standage; James A Stapleton; Susan R Steinman; Joe Stein; Benjamin Taylor; Will Trimble; Heather L Wiencko; Michael Wright; Brian Wyss; Qingpeng Zhang; En Zyme; C Titus Brown
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-09-25

8.  The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST).

Authors:  Ross Overbeek; Robert Olson; Gordon D Pusch; Gary J Olsen; James J Davis; Terry Disz; Robert A Edwards; Svetlana Gerdes; Bruce Parrello; Maulik Shukla; Veronika Vonstein; Alice R Wattam; Fangfang Xia; Rick Stevens
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in the Physiology of Spore Formation for Bacillus Probiotic Production.

Authors:  Vladimir Elisashvili; Eva Kachlishvili; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Functional Annotation Genome Unravels Potential Probiotic Bacillus velezensis Strain KMU01 from Traditional Korean Fermented Kimchi.

Authors:  Sojeong Heo; Jong-Hoon Kim; Mi-Sun Kwak; Moon-Hee Sung; Do-Won Jeong
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.