| Literature DB >> 30532742 |
Jing-E Ma1, Hai-Ying Jiang1, Lin-Miao Li1, Xiu-Juan Zhang1, Guan-Yu Li1, Hui-Ming Li1, Xue-Jun Jin1, Jin-Ping Chen1.
Abstract
The characteristics of flora in the intestine of an animal, including the number and abundance of different microbial species and their functions, are closely related to the diets of the animal and affect the physical condition of the host. The Malayan pangolin (Manis javanica) is an endangered species that specializes in myrmecophagy. Analyzing the microbiome in the intestine of the pangolin is imperative to protect this species. By sequencing the metagenomes of the feces of four pangolins, we constructed a non-redundant catalog of 211,868 genes representing 1,811 metagenomic species. Taxonomic annotation revealed that Bacteroidetes (49.9%), Proteobacteria (32.2%), and Firmicutes (12.6%) are the three main phyla. The annotation of gene functions identified 5,044 genes from 88 different glycoside hydrolase (GH) families in the Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes database and 114 gene modules related to chitin-degrading enzymes, corresponding to the catalytic domains of GH18 family enzymes, containing chitinase genes of classes III and V in the dataset. Fourteen gene modules corresponded to the catalytic domains of GH19 family enzymes, containing chitinase genes of classes I, II, and IV. These genes were found in 37 species belonging to four phyla: Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. Moreover, when the metabolic pathways of these genes were summarized, 41,711 genes were associated with 147 unique KEGG metabolic pathways, and these genes were assigned to two Gene Ontology terms: metabolic process and catalytic activity. We also found several species that likely play roles in the digestion of cellulose and may be able to degrade chitin, including Enterobacter cloacae, Lactococcus lactis, Chitinimonas koreensis, and Chitinophaga pinensis. In addition, we identified some intestinal microflora and genes related to diseases in pangolins. Twenty-seven species were identified by STAMP analysis as differentially abundant in healthy and diseased animals: 20 species, including Cellulosilyticum lentocellum and Lactobacillus reuteri, were more abundant in healthy pangolins, while seven species, including Odoribacter splanchnicus, Marinilabilia salmonicolor, Xanthomonas citri, Xanthomonas vasicola, Oxalobacter formigenes, Prolixibacter bellariivorans, and Clostridium bolteae, were more abundant in diseased pangolins. These results will support the efforts to conserve pangolins.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose digestion; chitin-degrading enzymes; intestinal microflora; myrmecophagy; rescue
Year: 2018 PMID: 30532742 PMCID: PMC6265309 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02793
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Summary of sequencing data for each sample.
| A-1 | 62,101,040 | 47,667,966 | 76.76 | NA | NA |
| A-2 | 62,042,452 | 47,239,496 | 76.14 | NA | NA |
| B-1 | 63,606,778 | 48,32,110 | 76.14 | NA | NA |
| B-2 | 65,136,336 | 47,759,588 | 73.32 | NA | NA |
Statistics of the assembly results.
| A-1 | 51 | 31,605 | 97,804,197 | 9,296 | 974 | 470,796 | 500 | 3,094 | 71.55 |
| A-2 | 71 | 28,268 | 64,981,646 | 5,352 | 770 | 561,084 | 500 | 2,298 | 60.05 |
| B-1 | 51 | 43,354 | 106,048,061 | 5,488 | 824 | 721,113 | 500 | 2,446 | 55.79 |
| B-2 | 71 | 18,081 | 53,676,611 | 9,409 | 929 | 524,603 | 500 | 2,968 | 74.7 |
Figure 1Length distribution of genes. The X-axis indicates the length intervals, and the Y-axis represents the number of genes.
Figure 2Metabolic pathway analysis of genes. The X-axis shows the numbers of annotated genes in one class, and the Y-axis shows the KEGG functional classes. (A) Carbohydrate metabolism, (B) amino acid metabolism, (C) lipid metabolism, (D) nucleotide metabolism, (E) metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, (F) glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, (G) xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism, and (H) metabolism of other amino acids.
Figure 3Gene Ontology (GO) classification analysis of genes. The X-axis shows the GO function classes. The right side of the Y-axis shows the number of genes having that GO function, and the left side shows the percentage.
Enzymes related to carbohydrate degradations.
| Glycoside Hydrolases (GHs) | GH0,GH1,GH10,GH101,GH102,GH103,GH104,GH105,GH106,GH108,GH109,GH110,GH112,GH113,GH115,GH116,GH117,GH12,GH120,GH123,GH125,GH126,GH127,GH128,GH129,GH13,GH130,GH15,GH16,GH17,GH18,GH19,GH2,GH20,GH23,GH24,GH25,GH26,GH27,GH28,GH29,GH3,GH30,GH31,GH32,GH33,GH35,GH36,GH37,GH38,GH39,GH4,GH42,GH43,GH48,GH5,GH50,GH51,GH53,GH55,GH57,GH59,GH63,GH65,GH66,GH67,GH73,GH74,GH76,GH77,GH78,GH79,GH8,GH81,GH84,GH85,GH88,GH89,GH9,GH90,GH91,GH92,GH93,GH94,GH95,GH97,GH98,GH99 |
| Glycosyl Transferases (GTs) | GT9,GT11,GT35,GT4,GT2,GT56,GT8,GT28,GT0,GT51,GT32,GT83,GT5,GT14,GT20,GT26,GT30,GT19,GT1,GT44,GT25,GT3,GT6,GT23,GT39,GT66,GT73,GT10,GT63,GT84,GT41 |
| Polysaccharide Lyases (PLs) | PL0,PL1,PL10,PL11,PL12,PL13,PL15,PL17,PL21,PL5,PL6,PL7,PL8,PL9 |
| Carbohydrate Esterases (CEs) | CE0,CE1,CE10,CE11,CE12,CE14,CE15,CE2,CE4,CE6,CE7,CE8,CE9 |
| Carbohydrate-Binding Modules (CBMs) | CBM0,CBM12,CBM13,CBM18,CBM2,CBM20,CBM22,CBM23,CBM25,CBM26,CBM27,CBM3,CBM32,CBM33,CBM34,CBM35,CBM37,CBM4,CBM40,CBM41,CBM46,CBM47,CBM48,CBM5,CBM50,CBM51,CBM56,CBM57,CBM58,CBM59,CBM6,CBM61,CBM9 |
There are mainly four kinds of enzymes related to carbohydrate degradations: Glycoside Hydrolases (GHs), Glycosyl Transferases (GTs), Polysaccharide Lyases (PLs), Carbohydrate Esterases (CEs). In addition, Carbohydrate-Binding Modules (CBMs) representing adhesion to carbohydrates are also included.
Figure 4Taxonomy classification summary. The top 8 annotations in four Manis javanica at species level are shown in different colors. (A) Taxonomy classify summary (A-1), (B) taxonomy classify summary (A-2), (C) taxonomy classify summary (B-1), and (D) taxonomy classify summary (B-2).
Microbe species related to cellulose digestion or chitin degradation.
Microbe species related to genes of chitin digestion.
| [denovogenes]_68467 | |
| [denovogenes]_151116, [denovogenes]_74830 | |
| [denovogenes]_42081 | |
| [denovogenes]_61326 | |
| [denovogenes]_79414 | |
| [denovogenes]_17967 | |
| [denovogenes]_61119, [denovogenes]_64063, [denovogenes]_136569 | |
| [denovogenes]_55755 | |
| [denovogenes]_66063 | |
| [denovogenes]_61999, [denovogenes]_76501 | |
| [denovogenes]_121873, [denovogenes]_55512 | |
| [denovogenes]_20169, [denovogenes]_56831 | |
| [denovogenes]_21169, [denovogenes]_24780, [denovogenes]_55984, [denovogenes]_61438, [denovogenes]_65266, [denovogenes]_82405 | |
| [denovogenes]_100953 | |
| [denovogenes]_60040 | |
| [denovogenes]_55052 | |
| [denovogenes]_134103 | |
| [denovogenes]_106655 | |
| [denovogenes]_7860 | |
| [denovogenes]_43771 | |
| [denovogenes]_101794, [denovogenes]_116160 | |
| [denovogenes]_90393 | |
| [denovogenes]_84094, [denovogenes]_98045 | |
| [denovogenes]_93205 | |
| [denovogenes]_28627, [denovogenes]_5543, [denovogenes]_67187 | |
| [denovogenes]_64813, [denovogenes]_78835 | |
| [denovogenes]_34460 | |
| [denovogenes]_4353 | |
| [denovogenes]_19914, [denovogenes]_20262 | |
| [denovogenes]_115156, [denovogenes]_143438 | |
| [denovogenes]_121842 | |
| [denovogenes]_77129 | |
| [denovogenes]_41394 | |
| [denovogenes]_119305 | |
| [denovogenes]_28742, [denovogenes]_139898, [denovogenes]_139972, [denovogenes]_142955 | |
| [denovogenes]_139146 | |
| [denovogenes]_67050 |
Figure 5Venn diagrams. The numbers of genes that were shared or not shared by the four individuals, depending on overlaps, are shown. For this presentation, two individuals had to be combined, thus affecting the number of genes shared by both individuals. (A) The number of genes shared by groups A and B. (B) The number of genes shared by the two individuals of group A. (C) The number of genes shared by the two individuals of group B.
Figure 6KEGG pathway and Gene Ontology (GO) classification analysis of genes with different abundance between the group A and B samples. (A) GO functional classification. (B) Top 20 statistics of pathway enrichment for A group vs. B group.
Figure 7Metagenomic profile comparisons of differentially abundant species between the group A and B samples using STAMP analysis. A positive difference between proportions denotes a greater abundance in group A (orange), whereas a negative difference between proportions shows a greater abundance in group B (orange) for the given gene. Corrected P-values (q-values) were calculated based on G Test (w + Yates) + Fisher's statistical test using Story's FDR approach. Features with q < 0.05 were considered significant and were thus retained.