| Literature DB >> 30532638 |
Muhammad Sohail1,2, Akhtar Naveed1, Rouf Abdul1, Hajji Muhammad Shoaib Khan1, Hira Khan3.
Abstract
Focus of the study was to design a novel and cost effective extraction technique for the lycopene from Lycopersicum esculentum L. fruit and to develop and characterize a stable emulgel formulation containing lycopene as an active ingredient as well as to design an analytical method to determine lycopene concentration in emulgel. Emulgel formulation was prepared and evaluated for its stability at different storage conditions, 8 °C, 25 °C, 40 °C, 40 °C + 75% relative humidity (RH) and 50 °C, for 6 months. Results were statistically analyzed using two way ANOVA, Post-Hoc test and paired sample t-test at 5% significance level. Designed extraction technique presented comparable yield, 154.83 mg/Kg of tomato fruit, with all recoveries in the range of 145-156 mg/Kg of tomato. "P-values" calculated for different levels of stability parameters were <0.05, except at 50 °C and time points of 60th day and later. Analytical method designed was having linear range of lycopene 1-10 µg/mL with limit of detection 0.11 µg/mL and limit of quantification 0.34 µg/mL. All inter-day and intra-day recoveries were in the range of 94-105% while in all measurements RSD % was ≤5.36. It can be concluded that the extraction technique was cost effective with comparable results and analytical method was simple, robust, specific and sensitive enough to be used for lycopene concentration determination in emulgel formulation. Furthermore, designed formulation was stable even at high temperature of 40 °C and RH 75%.Entities:
Keywords: ANOVA; Analysis; Emulgel; Extraction; Lycopene; T-test
Year: 2018 PMID: 30532638 PMCID: PMC6263630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.07.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.330
Fig. 1FTIR spectrum of standard lycopene.
Fig. 2FTIR spectrum of extracted lycopene.
Interpretation of FTIR spectra of lycopene from different sources.
| Reported by Kamil et al. | Reported by Lopez-Cervantes et al. | Standard Lycopene | Extracted Lycopene | Functional Group Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3200–3450 cm−1 | 3356 cm−1 | 3285 cm−1 | 3360 cm−1 | CH (Stretching) |
| 2918 cm−1 | 2922 cm−1 | 2918 cm−1 | 2918 cm−1 | CH (Stretching) |
| 1643 cm−1 | 1652 cm−1 | 1652 cm−1 | 1656 cm−1 | C=C (Stretching) |
| 1101.07 cm−1 | 1088 cm−1 | 1035 cm−1 | 1022 cm−1 | CH (Trans) |
| 960 cm−1 | 965 cm−1 | 958 cm−1 | 958 cm−1 | R–CH=CH–R |
Fig. 3Variation of pH of control formulation with respect to time kept at different storage conditions.
Fig. 4Variation of pH of test formulation with respect to time kept at different storage conditions.
Fig. 5Standard lycopene curve at 472 nm.
Precision and accuracy of the method for determination of lycopene concentration in emulgel (n = 3).
| Concentration of lycopene (µg/mL) | Interday | Intraday | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean recovery (%) ± SEM | RSD (%) | Mean recovery (%) ± SEM | RSD (%) | |
| 2 | 101 ± 1.15 | 1.99 | 98 ± 0.5 | 0.86 |
| 5 | 99 ± 0.47 | 0.80 | 101 ± 0.2 | 0.39 |
| 8 | 102 ± 1.5 | 2.56 | 103 ± 1.5 | 2.1 |
Fig. 6Variation in lycopene concentration in emulgel with respect to time at various storage conditions.