| Literature DB >> 30532345 |
Katarzyna Dąbrowska-Zapart1, Kazimiera Chłopek1, Tadeusz Niedźwiedź2.
Abstract
The aim of the work was to compare the alder pollen seasons in the years 1997-2017 in Sosnowiec. The measurements of pollen concentration were taken with the volumetric method using Burkard's apparatus. The impact of atmospheric conditions on the daily alder pollen grain concentration, the annual totals, and the duration of pollen seasons were studied. The dependency between each meteorological condition and different features of the alder pollen season was determined by using Pearson's correlation coefficients, variance analysis with multiple comparison tests, and the linear regression model using backward elimination. It was proven that the temperatures directly preceding the pollination, i.e. the January and February temperatures as well as those from the period from 210 to 180 days preceding the beginning of the season, have the greatest impact on the beginning of the alder pollen season. The value of the daily alder pollen concentration in Sosnowiec showed a positive statistically significant correlation with the air temperature and sunshine duration and a negative correlation with the thickness of the snow cover and air relative humidity. The daily concentration also depended on the type of the weather front, direction of air mass inflow, and the type of the inflowing air mass. The season temperatures and the thermal conditions which were present in the summer of the preceding year impacted the annual totals (SPI) of the alder pollen grains.Entities:
Keywords: Alder pollen; Alnus; Meteorological conditions; Statistical analysis; Weather types
Year: 2018 PMID: 30532345 PMCID: PMC6245103 DOI: 10.1007/s10453-018-9524-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aerobiologia (Bologna) ISSN: 0393-5965 Impact factor: 2.410
Fig. 1Geographical location of Sosnowiec in Central Europe.
Reproduced with permission from www.vecteezy.com/map-vector
Statistics of alder pollen season in Sosnowiec
| Data from the years 1997–2017 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning of the season (days) | End of the season (days) | Duration of the season (days) | Maximum daily concentration (grains/m3) | Maximum concentration date | Annual total | |
|
| 48 | 104 | 56 | 445 | 71 | 2160 |
| Min | 16 (2007) | 76 (2014) | 30 (2017) | 70 (2009) | 50 (2002) | 429 (2009) |
| Max | 80 (2006) | 136 (2006) | 103 (2007) | 1213 (2003) | 102 (2103) | 4742 (2003) |
| SD | 18.5 | 15.8 | 19.2 | 367.3 | 13.9 | 1435.7 |
| 38.7 | 15.2 | 34 | 82.6 | 19.5 | 66.5 | |
, arithmetic mean; Min, minimal concentration of pollen grains; Max, maximum concentration of pollen grains; SD, standard deviation; V, coefficient of variation
Characteristics of alder pollen seasons in Sosnowiec
| Year | Beginning of the pollen season | End of the pollen season | Duration of the pollen season | Maximum concentration | Date of max concentration | Annual total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 21.02 (52) | 15.04 (105) | 53 | 109 | 2.03 (61) | 533 | 4 | 2 |
| 1998 | 18.01 (18) | 23.03 (82) | 64 | 211 | 22.02 (53) | 1817 | 12 | 8 |
| 1999 | 5.02 (36) | 14.04 (104) | 68 | 476 | 3.03 (62) | 2302 | 10 | 5 |
| 2000 | 4.02 (35) | 2.05 (123) | 88 | 85 | 29.02 (60) | 823 | 5 | 1 |
| 2001 | 9.02 (40) | 4.04 (94) | 54 | 1172 | 12.03 (71) | 4707 | 12 | 9 |
| 2002 | 1.02 (32) | 2.05 (122) | 90 | 76 | 19.02 (50) | 931 | 6 | 0 |
| 2003 | 11.03 (70) | 20.04 (110) | 40 | 1213 | 27.03 (86) | 4742 | 15 | 12 |
| 2004 | 6.02 (37) | 12.04 (103) | 66 | 996 | 18.03 (78) | 3270 | 9 | 5 |
| 2005 | 11.03 (70) | 20.04 (110) | 40 | 324 | 27.03 (86) | 1405 | 9 | 6 |
| 2006 | 21.03 (80) | 16.05 (136) | 56 | 361 | 1.04 (91) | 2104 | 12 | 7 |
| 2007 | 16.01 (16) | 29.04 (119) | 103 | 92 | 12.03 (71) | 822 | 6 | 2 |
| 2008 | 26.01 (26) | 21.03 (81) | 55 | 819 | 24.02 (55) | 4691 | 16 | 9 |
| 2009 | 5.03 (64) | 4.05 (124) | 60 | 70 | 17.03 (76) | 429 | 2 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2.03 (61) | 10.04 (100) | 39 | 757 | 21.03 (80) | 3580 | 9 | 9 |
| 2011 | 6.03 (65) | 15.04 (105) | 40 | 195 | 22.03 (81) | 781 | 5 | 2 |
| 2012 | 2.03 (62) | 3.04 (94) | 32 | 280 | 19.03 (79) | 1129 | 5 | 4 |
| 2013 | 5.03 (64) | 26.04 (116) | 52 | 623 | 12.04 (102) | 2060 | 7 | 6 |
| 2014 | 1.02 (32) | 17.03 (76) | 44 | 337 | 9.03 (68) | 3136 | 18 | 15 |
| 2015 | 21.02 (52) | 8.04 (98) | 46 | 163 | 8.03 (67) | 1217 | 9 | 4 |
| 2016 | 4.02 (35) | 8.04 (99) | 64 | 715 | 22.02 (53) | 3447 | 14 | 9 |
| 2017 | 24.02 (55) | 26.03 (85) | 30 | 266 | 5.03 (64) | 1407 | 9 | 6 |
The numbers in parentheses indicate the consecutive day from the beginning of the pollen season
Correlation coefficient values determining the dependency between the beginning of the pollen season and the weather conditions in the preceding period in a range from 5 to 210 days
| Number of days preceding the season | Weather elements | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average T | Minimum T | Maximum T | T 5 cm | Precipitation | Relative humidity | Sunshine duration | |
| 5 | − 0.52 | − 0.52 | − 0.45 | − 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| 10 | − 0.54 | − 0.40 | − 0.52 | − 0.64* | − 0.55 | − 0.18 | 0.11 |
| 15 | − 0.41 | − 0.48 | − 0.54 | − 0.55 | − 0.72** | − 0.37 | 0.45 |
| 20 | − 0.45 | − 0.60* | − 0.59 | − 0.62* | − 0.55 | − 0.60 | 0.48 |
| 25 | − 0.83*** | − 0.84*** | − 0.70** | − 0.83*** | − 0.45 | − 0.76* | 0.52 |
| 30 | − 0.84*** | − 0.84*** | − 0.72** | − 0.82*** | − 0.36 | − 0.80*** | 0.61 |
| 40 | − 0.80*** | − 0.79** | − 0.71** | − 0.80*** | − 0.41 | − 0.66* | 0.60 |
| 60 | − 0.69* | − 0.65* | − 0.62* | − 0.62* | − 0.05 | − 0.80*** | 0.55 |
| 90 | − 0.64* | − 0.71** | − 0.65* | − 0.67* | − 0.14 | − 0.53 | 0.31 |
| 120 | − 0.70** | − 0.69* | − 0.72** | − 0.68* | 0.18 | − 0.08 | − 0.23 |
| 150 | − 0.71** | − 0.75** | − 0.78** | − 0.75** | − 0.32 | − 0.03 | − 0.32 |
| 180 | − 0.89*** | − 0.87*** | − 0.88*** | − 0.84*** | − 0.44 | 0.35 | − 0.31 |
| 210 | − 0.91*** | − 0.89*** | − 0.92*** | − 0.87*** | − 0.70 | 0.22 | − 0.43 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Correlation coefficients between the average monthly values of the weather conditions and the alder pollen season beginning date
| Meteorological conditions | Beginning of the pollen season |
|---|---|
| Average temperature January | − 0.65* |
| Minimum temperature January | − 0.66* |
| Maximum temperature January | − 0.78** |
| Ground temperature January | − 0.67* |
| Average temperature February | − 0.79** |
| Minimum temperature February | − 0.81*** |
| Maximum temperature February | − 0.74** |
| Ground temperature February | − 0.81*** |
| Average temperature January–February | − 0.87*** |
| Minimum temperature January–February | − 0.91*** |
| Maximum temperature January–February | − 0.84*** |
| Ground temperature January–February | − 0.86*** |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Results of Pearson’s r correlation between the number of alder pollen grains and the weather conditions
| Weather conditions | Alder pollen grain daily concentration |
|---|---|
| Precipitation | − 0.03 |
| Snow cover thickness | − 0.09** |
| Average wind speed | 0.03 |
| Maximum wind speed | 0.04 |
| Maximum temperature | 0.19*** |
| Minimum temperature | 0.11*** |
| Ground temperature | 0.09** |
| Average temperature February | 0.17*** |
| Temperature amplitude | 0.15*** |
| Sunshine duration | 0.07* |
| Relative humidity | − 0.08** |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Results of the variance analysis of the number of alder pollen grains on account of the weather front type
| Front type | Frequency % | Alder pollen grain number |
|---|---|---|
| No front | 59.2 | 30.06 (± 91.25) |
| Cold | 10.5 | 43.74 (± 115.91) |
| Warm | 14.0 | 66.36 (± 177.28) |
| Occluded | 5.5 | 28.63 (± 93.27) |
| Stationary front | 5.2 | 34.38 (± 83.93) |
| Various fronts | 5.6 | 34.33 (± 64.41) |
|
|
Results of the analysis of variance of the alder pollen grain number on account of the air mass inflow direction
| Direction | Frequency % | Alder pollen grain number |
|---|---|---|
| N + NEa | 7.3 | 15.96 (± 66.58) |
| E + SEa | 11.6 | 27.43 (± 58.49) |
| S + SWa | 5.8 | 55.55 (± 155.46) |
| W + NWa | 12.6 | 53.67 (± 147.86) |
| Ca + Ka | 12.2 | 26.46 (± 79.04) |
| N + NEc | 7.3 | 24.71 (± 50.74) |
| E + SEc | 6.2 | 14.06 (± 47.28) |
| S + SWc | 8.9 | 72.44 (± 174.67) |
| W + NWc | 12.9 | 45.52 (± 111.2) |
| Cc + Bc | 12.9 | 21.01 (± 57.13) |
|
| 2.3 | 27.09 (± 45.6) |
|
|
Anticyclonic situations: N + NEa, E + Sea, S + Swa, W + NWa, Ca + Ka; Ca, central anticyclone situation (high centre); Ka, anticyclonic wedge or ridge of high pressure
Cyclonic situations: N + NEc, E + Sec, S + SWc, W + NWc, Cc + Bc; Cc, central cyclonic, centre of low; Bc, trough of low pressure (different directions of air flow and frontal system in the axis of through)
x, undefined type
The letters: N, NE, E, SE, S, W, NW, SW indicate the directions of air mass inflow
Results of the variance analysis of the number of alder pollen grains on account of the air masses
| Air mass type | Frequency % | Alder pollen grain number |
|---|---|---|
| A | 13.1 | 7.43 (± 16.36) |
| mP | 11.6 | 33.8 (± 72.84) |
| omP | 32.5 | 28.98 (± 79.69) |
| cP | 20.0 | 37.25 (± 116.65) |
| wmP | 11.6 | 92.13 (± 183.91) |
| T | 0.7 | 5.1 (± 13.41) |
| v.a.m. | 10.6 | 41.86 (± 125.6) |
|
|
omP, old maritime polar air (transformed); wmP, warm maritime polar air; fmP, fresh maritime polar air; cP, continental polar air; A, arctic air; T, tropical air; v.a.m., various air masses at the fronts
Fig. 2Average number of alder pollen grains broken down into weather front type
Fig. 3Average number of alder pollen grains broken down into the direction of air mass inflow. Anticyclonic situations: N + NEa, E + Sea, S + Swa, W + NWa, Ca + Ka; Ca, central anticyclone situation (high centre); Ka, anticyclonic wedge or ridge of high pressure; cyclonic situations: N + NEc, E + Sec, S + SWc, W + NWc, Cc + Bc; Cc, central cyclonic, centre of low; Bc, trough of low pressure (different directions of air flow and frontal system in the axis of through); x, undefined type. The letters: N, NE, E, SE, S, W, NW, SW indicate the directions of air mass inflow
Fig. 4Average number of alder pollen grains broken down into air masses. omP, old maritime polar air (transformed); wmP, warm maritime polar air; fmP, fresh maritime polar air; cP, continental polar air; A, arctic air; T, tropical air; v.a.m., various air masses at the fronts
Results of the regression analysis for the impact of the weather conditions on the number of alder pollen grains
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 5 | 13.51 | 0.000 | 0.05 |
| Residual | 1146 |
df, number of degrees of freedom; F, ANOVA statistics; p, statistical significance; R2, determination coefficient
Results of the regression analysis for the impact of the weather conditions on the number of alder pollen grains
| Unstandardised coefficients | Standardised coefficients |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Standard error | Beta | |||
| (Constant) | 88.53 | 28.78 | 3.08 | 0.002 | |
| Average wind speed | 5.00 | 2.91 | 0.05 | 1.72 | 0.087 |
| Average temperature | 14.36 | 3.04 | 0.66 | 4.72 | 0.000 |
| Temperature amplitude | 5.62 | 1.19 | 0.24 | 4.72 | 0.000 |
| Sunshine duration | − 2.25 | 1.22 | − 0.09 | − 1.84 | 0.066 |
| Relative humidity | − 18.66 | 4.59 | − 0.58 | − 4.07 | 0.000 |
B, unstandardised impact slope; Beta, standardised impact slope; t, Student’s t statistics; p statistical significance
Results of Pearson’s r correlation between the annual total number of alder pollen grains and the weather conditions for annual data
| Weather conditions | Alder pollen grain number |
|---|---|
| Precipitation | − 0.42* |
| Snow cover thickness | 0.15 |
| Average wind speed | − 0.28 |
| Maximum wind speed | − 0.12 |
| Maximum temperature | − 0.45* |
| Minimum temperature | − 0.44* |
| Ground temperature | − 0.32 |
| Average temperature | − 0.46* |
| Temperature amplitude | − 0.32 |
| Sunshine duration | − 0.40 |
| Humidity | 0.37 |
*p < 0.05
Correlation coefficients between meteorological elements in the year preceding pollination and the annual total of alder pollen grains
| Weather conditions | Alder pollen grain number |
|---|---|
| Precipitation July–September | − 0.46* |
| Average wind speed | − 0.20 |
| Maximum wind speed July–September | − 0.24 |
| Maximum temperature July–September | 0.65** |
| Minimum temperature July–September | 0.66** |
| Ground temperature July–September | 0.64** |
| Average temperature July–September | 0.73** |
| Temperature amplitude July–September | 0.55** |
| Sunshine duration July–September | 0.44* |
| Humidity | 0.37 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Results of Pearson’s r correlation between the pollen season duration and the weather conditions
| Weather conditions | Duration of the pollen season |
|---|---|
| Precipitation | − 0.19 |
| Snow cover thickness | − 0.28 |
| Average wind speed | 0.56** |
| Maximum wind speed | 0.59** |
| Maximum temperature | − 0.45* |
| Minimum temperature | − 0.44* |
| Ground temperature | − 0.47* |
| Average temperature | − 0.46* |
| Temperature amplitude | − 0.32 |
| Sunshine duration | − 0.40 |
| Relative humidity | 0.47* |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Fig. 5The average course of pollen seasons from the years 1997–2017