OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between subrogate index for the evaluation of insulin resistance with the M value obtained with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp as well as their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. METHOD: The euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp was performed in subjects having both normal fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin concentrations. HOMA-IR, QUICKI, HOMA2%S, TyG, TyG*body mass index (BMI) and triglyceride/HDL indexes were calculated. Correlations coefficients were estimated between indexes results and the M-value adjusted by fat-free mass. Areas under the ROC curve were constructed to evaluate overall performance, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the subrogate indexes. RESULTS: 57 subjects, 68.4% women, with a mean age of 32.9 ± 11 years-old were included. The subrogate index with the best correlation with the M value was HOMA2%S (r = 0.428), HOMA-IR had the greatest area under the ROC curve (0.683; 95 % confidence interval: 0.503-0.864) and TyG*BMI the best sensitivity (98.2 %) and specificity (51.1 %). CONCLUSIONS: The surrogated indexes for the evaluation of insulin resistance show a significant correlation with the M value obtained with the gold standard. Additional studies are required to determine cut-off values in Mexican population. Copyright:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between subrogate index for the evaluation of insulin resistance with the M value obtained with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp as well as their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. METHOD: The euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp was performed in subjects having both normal fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin concentrations. HOMA-IR, QUICKI, HOMA2%S, TyG, TyG*body mass index (BMI) and triglyceride/HDL indexes were calculated. Correlations coefficients were estimated between indexes results and the M-value adjusted by fat-free mass. Areas under the ROC curve were constructed to evaluate overall performance, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the subrogate indexes. RESULTS: 57 subjects, 68.4% women, with a mean age of 32.9 ± 11 years-old were included. The subrogate index with the best correlation with the M value was HOMA2%S (r = 0.428), HOMA-IR had the greatest area under the ROC curve (0.683; 95 % confidence interval: 0.503-0.864) and TyG*BMI the best sensitivity (98.2 %) and specificity (51.1 %). CONCLUSIONS: The surrogated indexes for the evaluation of insulin resistance show a significant correlation with the M value obtained with the gold standard. Additional studies are required to determine cut-off values in Mexican population. Copyright:
Authors: Elías Cardoso-Peña; Alexandra E Soto Pina; Ángel Gómez Villanueva; Gerardo Emilio López Chavez; Pablo Ramírez Martínez; Humberto Ramírez Montoya; María Guadalupe Berumen Lechuga; Alejandra Donají Benitez Arciniega; María de Lourdes Alarcón Fortepiani; Roxana Valdés Ramos; José de Jesús Garduño García Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 3.257