Literature DB >> 30531987

Machine learning applied to enzyme turnover numbers reveals protein structural correlates and improves metabolic models.

David Heckmann1, Colton J Lloyd2, Nathan Mih2, Yuanchi Ha2, Daniel C Zielinski2, Zachary B Haiman2, Abdelmoneim Amer Desouki3, Martin J Lercher3, Bernhard O Palsson4,5.   

Abstract

Knowing the catalytic turnover numbers of enzymes is essential for understanding the growth rate, proteome composition, and physiology of organisms, but experimental data on enzyme turnover numbers is sparse and noisy. Here, we demonstrate that machine learning can successfully predict catalytic turnover numbers in Escherichia coli based on integrated data on enzyme biochemistry, protein structure, and network context. We identify a diverse set of features that are consistently predictive for both in vivo and in vitro enzyme turnover rates, revealing novel protein structural correlates of catalytic turnover. We use our predictions to parameterize two mechanistic genome-scale modelling frameworks for proteome-limited metabolism, leading to significantly higher accuracy in the prediction of quantitative proteome data than previous approaches. The presented machine learning models thus provide a valuable tool for understanding metabolism and the proteome at the genome scale, and elucidate structural, biochemical, and network properties that underlie enzyme kinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30531987      PMCID: PMC6286351          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07652-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  62 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Branch point control by the phosphorylation state of isocitrate dehydrogenase. A quantitative examination of fluxes during a regulatory transition.

Authors:  K Walsh; D E Koshland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Thermosensitivity of growth is determined by chaperone-mediated proteome reallocation.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Ye Gao; Nathan Mih; Edward J O'Brien; Laurence Yang; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models.

Authors:  Nathan E Lewis; Kim K Hixson; Tom M Conrad; Joshua A Lerman; Pep Charusanti; Ashoka D Polpitiya; Joshua N Adkins; Gunnar Schramm; Samuel O Purvine; Daniel Lopez-Ferrer; Karl K Weitz; Roland Eils; Rainer König; Richard D Smith; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.429

6.  SABIO-RK--database for biochemical reaction kinetics.

Authors:  Ulrike Wittig; Renate Kania; Martin Golebiewski; Maja Rey; Lei Shi; Lenneke Jong; Enkhjargal Algaa; Andreas Weidemann; Heidrun Sauer-Danzwith; Saqib Mir; Olga Krebs; Meik Bittkowski; Elina Wetsch; Isabel Rojas; Wolfgang Müller
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A genome-scale Escherichia coli kinetic metabolic model k-ecoli457 satisfying flux data for multiple mutant strains.

Authors:  Ali Khodayari; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases.

Authors:  Ron Caspi; Richard Billington; Luciana Ferrer; Hartmut Foerster; Carol A Fulcher; Ingrid M Keseler; Anamika Kothari; Markus Krummenacker; Mario Latendresse; Lukas A Mueller; Quang Ong; Suzanne Paley; Pallavi Subhraveti; Daniel S Weaver; Peter D Karp
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  solveME: fast and reliable solution of nonlinear ME models.

Authors:  Laurence Yang; Ding Ma; Ali Ebrahim; Colton J Lloyd; Michael A Saunders; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Predictive biology: modelling, understanding and harnessing microbial complexity.

Authors:  Allison J Lopatkin; James J Collins
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Specifics of Metabolite-Protein Interactions and Their Computational Analysis and Prediction.

Authors:  Dirk Walther
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

3.  Synthetic Biology Meets Machine Learning.

Authors:  Brendan Fu-Long Sieow; Ryan De Sotto; Zhi Ren Darren Seet; In Young Hwang; Matthew Wook Chang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

4.  Non-linearity of Metabolic Pathways Critically Influences the Choice of Machine Learning Model.

Authors:  Ophélie Lo-Thong-Viramoutou; Philippe Charton; Xavier F Cadet; Brigitte Grondin-Perez; Emma Saavedra; Cédric Damour; Frédéric Cadet
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 5.  Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes.

Authors:  Christopher E Lawson; William R Harcombe; Roland Hatzenpichler; Stephen R Lindemann; Frank E Löffler; Michelle A O'Malley; Héctor García Martín; Brian F Pfleger; Lutgarde Raskin; Ophelia S Venturelli; David G Weissbrodt; Daniel R Noguera; Katherine D McMahon
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 6.  Machine learning for enzyme engineering, selection and design.

Authors:  Ryan Feehan; Daniel Montezano; Joanna S G Slusky
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.952

7.  Absolute Proteome Quantification in the Gas-Fermenting Acetogen Clostridium autoethanogenum.

Authors:  Kaspar Valgepea; Gert Talbo; Nobuaki Takemori; Ayako Takemori; Christina Ludwig; Vishnuvardhan Mahamkali; Alexander P Mueller; Ryan Tappel; Michael Köpke; Séan Dennis Simpson; Lars Keld Nielsen; Esteban Marcellin
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  The genetic basis for adaptation of model-designed syntrophic co-cultures.

Authors:  Colton J Lloyd; Zachary A King; Troy E Sandberg; Ying Hefner; Connor A Olson; Patrick V Phaneuf; Edward J O'Brien; Jon G Sanders; Rodolfo A Salido; Karenina Sanders; Caitriona Brennan; Gregory Humphrey; Rob Knight; Adam M Feist
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  Machine and deep learning meet genome-scale metabolic modeling.

Authors:  Guido Zampieri; Supreeta Vijayakumar; Elisabeth Yaneske; Claudio Angione
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Machine Learning Applications for Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics.

Authors:  Ulf W Liebal; An N T Phan; Malvika Sudhakar; Karthik Raman; Lars M Blank
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.