| Literature DB >> 30531926 |
Sergei V German1,2, Marina V Novoselova1,2, Daniil N Bratashov2,3, Polina A Demina2,4, Vsevolod S Atkin2, Denis V Voronin2, Boris N Khlebtsov2,5, Bogdan V Parakhonskiy2,6, Gleb B Sukhorukov2,7, Dmitry A Gorin8,9.
Abstract
We demonstrate a novel approach to the controlled loading of inorganic nanoparticles and proteins into submicron- and micron-sized porous particles. The approach is based on freezing/thawing cycles, which lead to high loading densities. The process was tested for the inclusion of Au, magnetite nanoparticles, and bovine serum albumin in biocompatible vaterite carriers of micron and submicron sizes. The amounts of loaded nanoparticles or substances were adjusted by the number of freezing/thawing cycles. Our method afforded at least a three times higher loading of magnetite nanoparticles and a four times higher loading of protein for micron vaterite particles, in comparison with conventional methods such as adsorption and coprecipitation. The capsules loaded with magnetite nanoparticles by the freezing-induced loading method moved faster in a magnetic field gradient than did the capsules loaded by adsorption or coprecipitation. Our approach allows the preparation of multicomponent nanocomposite materials with designed properties such as remote control (e.g. via the application of an electromagnetic or acoustic field) and cargo unloading. Such materials could be used as multimodal contrast agents, drug delivery systems, and sensors.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30531926 PMCID: PMC6288109 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35846-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Scheme of the FIL method; (b) (I), loading of MNPs by coprecipitation; (b) (II, III), 1st and 7th loading of MNPs by adsorption; (b) (IV, V), 1st and 7th loading of MNPs by FIL; (c), dependence of the MNP mass fraction (obtained by weighing the solid residue after each freezing-thawing cycle) on the number of freezing-thawing cycles.
Figure 2Optical microscopy of the FIL process. (a) Microparticle suspension; (b) Appearance of first ice fingers; (c) Pressing of nanoparticles into microparticles by ice fingers; (d–f) Scheme of MNP adsorption, induced by the movement of the crystallization front.
Figure 3SEM images of micron (a–f) and submicron (g–i) vaterite particles. (a,d,g) Before FIL; (b,e,h) after one FIL cycle; (c,f,i) after the maximum number of FIL cycles. The insets show SEM images at higher magnification.
Figure 4(a) SEM image of a microparticle loaded with AuNPs by FIL; (b) CLSM image of unloaded control microparticles; (c) CLSM image of a microparticle loaded with BSA–RITC by FIL; (d) dependence of the mass fraction of BSA–RITC on the number of freezing/thawing cycles or of adsorption steps. The arrow points to the mass fraction of BSA–RITC obtained by coprecipitation (empty red circle); (e) photo of the tubes containing CaCO3/BSA–RITC microparticles obtained by (I) adsorption, (II) coprecipitation, and (III) FIL.
Figure 5(a) Formation of polymeric capsules; (b–d) SEM images of microcapsules with different amounts of magnetite; (e–g) SEM images of submicron capsules with different amounts of magnetite.
Figure 6Time dependence of the extinction of the microcapsule solution in an external magnetic field.