Literature DB >> 30531560

Effects of Two Educational Posters on Contraceptive Knowledge and Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Seri Anderson1, Leah Frerichs, Alexander Kaysin, Stephanie B Wheeler, Carolyn Tucker Halpern, Kristen Hassmiller Lich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) contraceptive effectiveness poster with a more patient-centered poster on factors affecting the likelihood of using effective contraceptives.
METHODS: The posters were tested in a randomized controlled trial. Women were eligible if they were aged 18-44 years, could speak and read English, were not pregnant or trying to conceive, and had engaged in vaginal intercourse in the past 3 months. An online survey administered through Amazon Mechanical Turk was used to collect baseline and immediate follow-up data on three primary outcomes: contraceptive knowledge (measured using the Contraceptive Knowledge Assessment), perceived pregnancy risk, and the effectiveness of the contraceptive the woman intended to use in the next year. Subgroup analyses were conducted in women with prior pregnancy scares, low numeracy, and no current contraceptive. Within- and between-group differences were compared for the two randomized groups.
RESULTS: From January 26 to February 13, 2018, 2,930 people were screened and 990 randomized. For the primary outcomes, the only significant result was that the patient-centered poster produced a greater improvement in contraceptive knowledge than the CDC poster (P<.001). Relative to baseline, both posters significantly improved contraceptive knowledge (CDC +3.6, patient-centered +6.4 percentage points, P<.001) and a constructed score measuring the effectiveness of the contraceptive that women intended to use in the next year (CDC and patient-centered +3 percentage points, P<.01). This is equivalent to 1-17 of every 100 women who viewed a poster changing their intentions in favor of a more effective contraceptive.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both posters educate women about contraception and may reduce unplanned pregnancy risk by improving contraceptive intentions. Of the three primary outcomes, the patient-centered poster performs significantly better than the CDC poster at increasing contraceptive knowledge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03372369.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30531560      PMCID: PMC6309464          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  Hamster health care.

Authors:  I Morrison; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000 Dec 23-30

Review 2.  Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.

Authors:  Jesse Chandler; Danielle Shapiro
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 18.561

3.  Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: A randomized controlled trial to inform a World Health Organization family planning handbook.

Authors:  Markus J Steiner; James Trussell; Neha Mehta; Sean Condon; Sumathi Subramaniam; Deborah Bourne
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Prevalence and correlates of ambivalence towards pregnancy among nonpregnant women.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Patricia A Lohr; Melanie A Gold; Barbara Gerbert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs.

Authors:  Loretta Gavin; Susan Moskosky; Marion Carter; Kathryn Curtis; Evelyn Glass; Emily Godfrey; Arik Marcell; Nancy Mautone-Smith; Karen Pazol; Naomi Tepper; Lauren Zapata
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2014-04-25

6.  Validation of feeling, belief, and intention to act as three components of attitude and their contribution to prediction of contraceptive behavior.

Authors:  V Kothandapani
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1971-09

7.  Misunderstanding the risk of conception from unprotected and protected sex.

Authors:  M Antonia Biggs; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2012-12-08

8.  Young adults' contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: associations with risk of unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Laura Duberstein Lindberg; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-05-08

Review 9.  The Health Belief Model can guide modern contraceptive behavior research and practice.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Contraceptive Knowledge Assessment: validity and reliability of a novel contraceptive research tool.

Authors:  Meagan Campol Haynes; Nessa Ryan; Mona Saleh; Abigail Ford Winkel; Veronica Ades
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  2 in total

1.  Underestimation of pregnancy risk among women in Vietnam.

Authors:  Jessica Londeree; Nghia Nguyen; Linh H Nguyen; Dung H Tran; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intrauterine Contraception and Tubal Ligation.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Carrie A Lewis; Melanie S Dove; Eryn Murphy; Diana Zuckerman; Claudia Nunez-Eddy; Daniel J Tancredi; Raegan McDonald-Mosley; Sarita Sonalkar; Mark Hathaway; Aileen M Gariepy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.