Frederic Fahey1,2, Paul Christian3, Katherine Zukotynski4, Briana Sexton-Stallone5, Christina Kiss6, Bonnie Clarke6, Arzu Onar-Thomas7, Tina Young Poussaint2,8. 1. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts frederic.fahey@childrens.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 4. Department of Medicine and Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 5. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Clinical Trials Network, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Reston Virginia. 7. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; and. 8. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess image quality and quantitative brain PET across a multicenter consortium. Methods: All academic centers and children's hospitals in the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC) scanned a phantom developed by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Clinical Trials Network (SNMMI CTN) for the validation of brain PET studies associated with clinical trials. The phantom comprises 2 separate, fillable sections: a resolution/uniformity section and a clinical simulation section. The resolution/uniformity section is a cylinder 12.7 cm long and 20 cm in diameter; spatial resolution is evaluated subjectively with 2 sets of rods (hot and cold) of varying diameter (4.0, 5.0, 6.25, 7.81, 9.67, and 12.2 mm) and spacing (twice the rod diameter). The clinical simulation section simulates a transverse section of midbrain with ventricles and gray and white matter compartments. If properly filled, hot rods have a 4:1 target-to-background ratio, and gray-to-white matter sections have a 4:1 ratio. Uniformity and image quality were evaluated using the SUV in a small volume of interest as well as subjectively by 2 independent observers using a 4-point scale. Results: Eleven PBTC sites scanned the phantom on 13 PET scanners. The phantom's complexity led to suboptimal filling, particularly of the hot rod section, in 5 sites. The SUV in the uniformity section was within 10% of unity on only 5 of 13 scanners, although 12 of 13 were subjectively judged to have very good to excellent uniformity. Four of 6 hot rods were discernable by all 13 scanners, whereas 3 of 6 cold rods were discernable by only 5 scanners. Four of 13 scanners had a gray-to-white matter ratio between 3.0 and 5.0 (4.0 is truth); however, 11 of 13 scanners were subjectively judged to have very good or excellent image quality. Conclusion: Eleven sites were able to image a powerful phantom developed by the SNMMI CTN that evaluated image uniformity, spatial resolution, and image quality of brain PET. There was considerable variation in PET data across the PBTC sites, possibly resulting from variations in scanning across the sites due to challenges in filling the phantom.
The purpose of this study was to assess image quality and quantitative brain PET across a multicenter consortium. Methods: All academic centers and children's hospitals in the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC) scanned a phantom developed by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Clinical Trials Network (SNMMI CTN) for the validation of brain PET studies associated with clinical trials. The phantom comprises 2 separate, fillable sections: a resolution/uniformity section and a clinical simulation section. The resolution/uniformity section is a cylinder 12.7 cm long and 20 cm in diameter; spatial resolution is evaluated subjectively with 2 sets of rods (hot and cold) of varying diameter (4.0, 5.0, 6.25, 7.81, 9.67, and 12.2 mm) and spacing (twice the rod diameter). The clinical simulation section simulates a transverse section of midbrain with ventricles and gray and white matter compartments. If properly filled, hot rods have a 4:1 target-to-background ratio, and gray-to-white matter sections have a 4:1 ratio. Uniformity and image quality were evaluated using the SUV in a small volume of interest as well as subjectively by 2 independent observers using a 4-point scale. Results: Eleven PBTC sites scanned the phantom on 13 PET scanners. The phantom's complexity led to suboptimal filling, particularly of the hot rod section, in 5 sites. The SUV in the uniformity section was within 10% of unity on only 5 of 13 scanners, although 12 of 13 were subjectively judged to have very good to excellent uniformity. Four of 6 hot rods were discernable by all 13 scanners, whereas 3 of 6 cold rods were discernable by only 5 scanners. Four of 13 scanners had a gray-to-white matter ratio between 3.0 and 5.0 (4.0 is truth); however, 11 of 13 scanners were subjectively judged to have very good or excellent image quality. Conclusion: Eleven sites were able to image a powerful phantom developed by the SNMMI CTN that evaluated image uniformity, spatial resolution, and image quality of brain PET. There was considerable variation in PET data across the PBTC sites, possibly resulting from variations in scanning across the sites due to challenges in filling the phantom.
Authors: Pawel J Markiewicz; Casper da Costa-Luis; J Dickson; A Barnes; G Krokos; J MacKewn; T Clark; C Wimberley; G MacNaught; M M Yaqub; J D Gispert; B F Hutton; P Marsden; A Hammers; A J Reader; S Ourselin; K Herholz; J C Matthews; F Barkhof Journal: Med Phys Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 4.506