OBJECTIVES: There are approximately 660 000 end-stage renal disease patients in the USA, with hemodialysis (HD) the primary form of treatment. High ultrafiltration rates (UFRs) are associated with intradialytic hypotension, a complication associated with adverse clinical outcomes including mortality. Individualized UFR profiles could reduce the incidence of intradialytic hypotension. METHODS: The patient's fluid dynamics during HD is described by a nonlinear model comprising intravascular and interstitial pools, whose parameters are given by the patient's estimated nominal parameter values with uncertainty ranges; the output measurement is hematocrit. We design UFR profiles that minimize the maximal UFR needed to remove a prescribed volume of fluid within a set time, with hematocrit not exceeding a specified time-varying critical profile. RESULTS: We present a novel approach to design individualized UFR profiles, and give theoretical results guaranteeing that the system remains within a predefined physiologically plausible region and does not exceed a specified time-invariant critical hematocrit level for all parameters in the uncertainty ranges. We test the performance of our design using a real patient data example. The designed UFR maintains the system below a time-varying critical hematocrit profile in the example. CONCLUSION: Theoretical results and simulations show that our designed UFR profiles can remove the target amount of fluid in a given time period while keeping the hematocrit below a specified critical profile. SIGNIFICANCE: Individualization of UFR profiles is now feasible using current HD technology and may reduce the incidence of intradialytic hypotension.
OBJECTIVES: There are approximately 660 000 end-stage renal diseasepatients in the USA, with hemodialysis (HD) the primary form of treatment. High ultrafiltration rates (UFRs) are associated with intradialytic hypotension, a complication associated with adverse clinical outcomes including mortality. Individualized UFR profiles could reduce the incidence of intradialytic hypotension. METHODS: The patient's fluid dynamics during HD is described by a nonlinear model comprising intravascular and interstitial pools, whose parameters are given by the patient's estimated nominal parameter values with uncertainty ranges; the output measurement is hematocrit. We design UFR profiles that minimize the maximal UFR needed to remove a prescribed volume of fluid within a set time, with hematocrit not exceeding a specified time-varying critical profile. RESULTS: We present a novel approach to design individualized UFR profiles, and give theoretical results guaranteeing that the system remains within a predefined physiologically plausible region and does not exceed a specified time-invariant critical hematocrit level for all parameters in the uncertainty ranges. We test the performance of our design using a real patient data example. The designed UFR maintains the system below a time-varying critical hematocrit profile in the example. CONCLUSION: Theoretical results and simulations show that our designed UFR profiles can remove the target amount of fluid in a given time period while keeping the hematocrit below a specified critical profile. SIGNIFICANCE: Individualization of UFR profiles is now feasible using current HD technology and may reduce the incidence of intradialytic hypotension.
Authors: Donal N Reddan; Lynda Anne Szczech; Vic Hasselblad; Edmund G Lowrie; Robert M Lindsay; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Robert D Toto; John Stivelman; James F Winchester; Linda A Zillman; Robert M Califf; William F Owen Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: P W Chamney; C Johner; C Aldridge; M Krämer; N Valasco; J E Tattersall; T Aukaidey; R Gordon; R N Greenwood Journal: J Med Eng Technol Date: 1999 Mar-Apr
Authors: Bergur V Stefánsson; Steven M Brunelli; Claudia Cabrera; David Rosenbaum; Emmanuel Anum; Karthik Ramakrishnan; Donna E Jensen; Nils-Olov Stålhammar Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Faizan Javed; Andrey V Savkin; Gregory S H Chan; James D Mackie; Nigel H Lovell Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Kelvin C W Leung; Robert R Quinn; Pietro Ravani; Henry Duff; Jennifer M MacRae Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 8.237