Literature DB >> 3053026

Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval: a comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base.

D Porter1, R S Wigton, M A Reidelbach, H L Bleich, W V Slack.   

Abstract

Colleague and PaperChase are the two most widely used computer systems designed specifically for clinicians and scientists who wish to search the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE data base of references to the biomedical literature. The present study compares the performance of these two systems. Two matched groups of second-year medical students each received 3 hr of instruction, one group in Colleague, the other in PaperChase. Each student then attempted 10 test searches. The next day the groups were reversed, and each student attempted 5 additional searches. During 3 1/2 hr allocated for searching, users of Colleague attempted 64 test searches and retrieved 326 target references; users of PaperChase attempted 78 searches and retrieved 496. Users of Colleague took a mean of 2.2 min and spent a mean of $1.20 to find each target reference; users of PaperChase took 1.6 min and spent $0.92. We conclude that after limited training, medical students find more references faster and at lower cost with PaperChase than with Colleague.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3053026     DOI: 10.1016/0010-4809(88)90007-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biomed Res        ISSN: 0010-4809


  1 in total

1.  Performances of 27 MEDLINE systems tested by searches with clinical questions.

Authors:  R B Haynes; C J Walker; K A McKibbon; M E Johnston; A R Willan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.