Rhonda Frances Brown1, Tanya Rebecca Muller2, Anna Olsen3. 1. Research School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Electronic address: rhonda.brown@anu.edu.au. 2. Research School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. 3. Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Cervical cancer screening registry data indicate that 43% of eligible Australian women did not screen in the latest reporting period (2014-2015). However, few prior empirical studies have examined whether the screening barriers and facilitators experienced by women can affect their screening attendance. Such information is required to inform the development of future tailored health promotion strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether the cervical cancer screening barriers and facilitators identified by women were related to their screening history, from November 2015 and January 2016. At this time, Australian women typically undertook a Pap test every two years. They were deemed overdue for screening if they have not screened in the past 27 months (i.e., overdue by more than three months). METHOD: In this study, a large sample (N = 338) of women were asked about their screening history including screening status (i.e., up-to-date vs. overdue) and prior screening (i.e., never screened vs. screened), and the psychological and practical screening barriers or facilitators they had experienced. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis indicated that screening status was related to a greater number of psychological barriers, but not practical barriers or facilitators. In contrast, prior screening was related to more practical and psychological screening barriers and fewer practical facilitators, but not psychological facilitators. Some individual psychological screening barriers (e.g., anxiety, embarrassment), practical barriers (e.g., lack of time) and practical facilitators (e.g., low cost of test) were related to women's screening status and prior screening. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that addressing practical cervical cancer screening facilitators (e.g., reminder prompts) and psychological screening barriers may help to optimize screening attendance in women who have never screened or are overdue for cervical cancer screening. Crown
RATIONALE: Cervical cancer screening registry data indicate that 43% of eligible Australian women did not screen in the latest reporting period (2014-2015). However, few prior empirical studies have examined whether the screening barriers and facilitators experienced by women can affect their screening attendance. Such information is required to inform the development of future tailored health promotion strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether the cervical cancer screening barriers and facilitators identified by women were related to their screening history, from November 2015 and January 2016. At this time, Australian women typically undertook a Pap test every two years. They were deemed overdue for screening if they have not screened in the past 27 months (i.e., overdue by more than three months). METHOD: In this study, a large sample (N = 338) of women were asked about their screening history including screening status (i.e., up-to-date vs. overdue) and prior screening (i.e., never screened vs. screened), and the psychological and practical screening barriers or facilitators they had experienced. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis indicated that screening status was related to a greater number of psychological barriers, but not practical barriers or facilitators. In contrast, prior screening was related to more practical and psychological screening barriers and fewer practical facilitators, but not psychological facilitators. Some individual psychological screening barriers (e.g., anxiety, embarrassment), practical barriers (e.g., lack of time) and practical facilitators (e.g., low cost of test) were related to women's screening status and prior screening. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that addressing practical cervical cancer screening facilitators (e.g., reminder prompts) and psychological screening barriers may help to optimize screening attendance in women who have never screened or are overdue for cervical cancer screening. Crown
Authors: David Barrera Ferro; Steffen Bayer; Laura Bocanegra; Sally Brailsford; Adriana Díaz; Elena Valentina Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Honora Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Tamara L Butler; Natasha Lee; Kate Anderson; Julia M L Brotherton; Joan Cunningham; John R Condon; Gail Garvey; Allison Tong; Suzanne P Moore; Clare M Maher; Jacqueline K Mein; Eloise F Warren; Lisa J Whop Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Federica Vallone; Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Francesco Palumbo; Elvira Lorenzo; Angelo D'Argenzio; Daniela Caso Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 3.955
Authors: Tamara L Butler; Kate Anderson; John R Condon; Gail Garvey; Julia M L Brotherton; Joan Cunningham; Allison Tong; Suzanne P Moore; Clare M Maher; Jacqueline K Mein; Eloise F Warren; Lisa J Whop Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240