Literature DB >> 30529419

Improving the adoption of optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill patients: A process evaluation of a complex quality improvement initiative.

Khara M Sauro1, Rebecca Brundin-Mather2, Jeanna Parsons Leigh3, Daniel J Niven4, Barry Kushner3, Andrea Soo3, Deborah J Cook5, Sharon Straus6, Christopher J Doig4, Sean Bagshaw7, Henry T Stelfox8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated a complex initiative to increase evidence-based use of low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among adult medical-surgical ICU patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included: quantitative survey and interviews. Participants were healthcare providers within four ICUs. Surveys collected knowledge of evidence underpinning best practice, exposure to the implementation strategies and their perceived utility, and recommendations. The interview expanded on survey topics. Descriptive statistics summarized the data and chi-squared tests were used to compare groups. Qualitative data were analyzed using a blended deductive and inductive coding approach.
RESULTS: Providers had good knowledge of the evidence (range = 58% to 94%). Pharmacist-to-physician reminders (80%), other reminders (50%), and local guidelines (50%) were the most commonly observed strategies. Local champions (76%), on-site education (74%), and computerized decision support system (69%) were perceived to be most helpful. Interviews elicited five themes: provider roles, perceptions of the implementation strategies, facilitators and barriers to uptake of best practice, and recommendations. Assessment of the implementation strategies varied by professional group.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this process evaluation identified implementation strategies that can improve the use of evidence-informed practices, help interpret outcomes in the context of interventions and guide future quality improvement initiatives.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior change; Evidence-based medicine; Health services research; Knowledge measurement; Program evaluation; Quality of care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30529419     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  3 in total

1.  A multicentre controlled pre-post trial of an implementation science intervention to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Henry T Stelfox; Rebecca Brundin-Mather; Andrea Soo; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Daniel J Niven; Kirsten M Fiest; Christopher James Doig; Danny J Zuege; Barry Kushner; Fiona Clement; Sharon E Straus; Deborah J Cook; Sean M Bagshaw; Khara M Sauro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  A Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Adult Critical Care Settings.

Authors:  Molly McNett; Dónal O'Mathúna; Sharon Tucker; Haley Roberts; Lorraine C Mion; Michele C Balas
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-12-16

3.  Impact of a Program to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis on Incidence of Thromboembolism and Bleeding Rates in Hospitalized Patients During Implementation of Programs to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Jenna K Lovely; Joel A Hickman; Matthew G Johnson; James M Naessens; Timothy I Morgenthaler
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-02-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.