Linda L Knol1, Cliff A Robb2, Erin M McKinley3, Mary Wood4. 1. Department of Human Nutrition and Hospitality Management, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL. Electronic address: lknol@ches.ua.edu. 2. Consumer Finance & Financial Planning, School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 3. Didactic Program in Dietetics, School of Nutrition & Food Science, LSU AgCenter, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. 4. Department of Human Nutrition and Hospitality Management, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the relationships between food security status and cooking self-efficacy and food preparation behaviors among college students. METHODS: Students living off campus while attending the University of Alabama completed an online survey between February and April 2016. Food security status was assessed using the Adult Food Security Survey Module. Cooking self-efficacy and food preparation behaviors were assessed using validated questionnaires. Multiple regression analysis was used to test for significant differences in cooking self-efficacy and food preparation scores by food security status. RESULTS: Among respondents (n = 368), 38.3% were food insecure. Very low food secure students had significantly lower cooking self-efficacy scores and food preparation scores than food secure students (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Preparing meals at home is less common for very low food secure students, and these students demonstrate less confidence in cooking ability. Further study of food-related decisions and trade-offs under resource constraints are needed.
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the relationships between food security status and cooking self-efficacy and food preparation behaviors among college students. METHODS: Students living off campus while attending the University of Alabama completed an online survey between February and April 2016. Food security status was assessed using the Adult Food Security Survey Module. Cooking self-efficacy and food preparation behaviors were assessed using validated questionnaires. Multiple regression analysis was used to test for significant differences in cooking self-efficacy and food preparation scores by food security status. RESULTS: Among respondents (n = 368), 38.3% were food insecure. Very low food secure students had significantly lower cooking self-efficacy scores and food preparation scores than food secure students (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Preparing meals at home is less common for very low food secure students, and these students demonstrate less confidence in cooking ability. Further study of food-related decisions and trade-offs under resource constraints are needed.
Authors: Hannah E Boone; Melissa D Gutschall; Alisha R Farris; Kimberly S Fasczewski; Donald Holbert; Laura H McArthur Journal: J Appalach Health Date: 2021-10-25
Authors: Matthew J Landry; Marissa Burgermaster; Alexandra E van den Berg; Fiona M Asigbee; Sarvenaz Vandyousefi; Reem Ghaddar; Matthew R Jeans; Adelyn Yau; Jaimie N Davis Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Andrea Begley; Lucy M Butcher; Vanessa Bobongie; Satvinder S Dhaliwal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Elizabeth D Davitt; Michelle M Heer; Donna M Winham; Simon T Knoblauch; Mack C Shelley Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 5.717