Literature DB >> 30528891

Response assessment after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Why are we missing complete responses with MRI and endoscopy?

Marit E van der Sande1, Geerard L Beets2, Britt Jp Hupkens3, Stéphanie O Breukink4, Jarno Melenhorst5, Frans Ch Bakers6, Doenja Mj Lambregts7, Heike I Grabsch8, Regina Gh Beets-Tan9, Monique Maas10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate what features on restaging MRI and endoscopy led to a false clinical diagnosis of residual tumour in patients with a pathological complete response after rectal cancer surgery.
METHODS: Patients with an unrecognized complete response after (chemo)radiotherapy were selected in a tertiary referral centre for rectal cancer treatment. An unrecognized complete response was defined as a clinical incomplete response at MRI and/or endoscopy with a pathological complete response of the primary tumour after surgery. The morphology of the tumour bed and the lymph nodes were evaluated on post-CRT T2-weighted MRI (T2-MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Post-CRT endoscopy images were evaluated for residual mucosal abnormalities. MRI and endoscopy features were correlated with histopathology.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with an unrecognized complete response were included. Mucosal abnormalities were present at restaging endoscopy in 84%, mixed signal intensity on T2-MRI in 53%, an irregular aspect of the former tumour location on T2-MRI in 69%, diffusion restriction on DWI in 51% and suspicious lymph nodes in 25%.
CONCLUSIONS: Overstaging of residual tumour after (chemo)radiotherapy in rectal cancer is mainly due to residual mucosal abnormalities at endoscopy, mixed signal intensity or irregular fibrosis at T2-MRI, diffusion restriction at DWI and residual suspicious lymph nodes. Presence of these features is not definitely associated with residual tumour and in selected cases an extended waiting interval can be considered.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete response; Endoscopy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Organ preservation; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30528891     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  12 in total

1.  The split scar sign as an indicator of sustained complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Inês Santiago; Maria Barata; Nuno Figueiredo; Oriol Parés; Vanessa Henriques; António Galzerano; Carlos Carvalho; Celso Matos; Richard J Heald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Watchful Waiting after Radiochemotherapy in Rectal Cancer: When Is It Feasible?

Authors:  Cihan Gani; Andreas Kirschniak; Daniel Zips
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 3.  [Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy: how certain is radiology?]

Authors:  Hanna Kuzior; Michel Eisenblätter
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  MRI at Restaging After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Overestimates Circumferential Resection Margin Proximity as Determined by Comparison With Whole-Mount Pathology.

Authors:  Jonathan B Yuval; Hannah M Thompson; Canan Firat; Floris S Verheij; Maria Widmar; Iris H Wei; Emmanouil Pappou; J Joshua Smith; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash; Jinru Shia; Marc J Gollub; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  T2*-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) of rectal cancer: correlation with clinical histopathologic prognostic factors.

Authors:  Shan Hu; Yang Peng; Qiushi Wang; Bin Liu; Ihab Kamel; Zaiyi Liu; Changhong Liang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 6.  The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Marc J Gollub; Gina Brown
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Daan Linders; Marion Deken; Maxime van der Valk; Willemieke Tummers; Shadhvi Bhairosingh; Dennis Schaap; Gesina van Lijnschoten; Elham Zonoobi; Peter Kuppen; Cornelis van de Velde; Alexander Vahrmeijer; Arantza Farina Sarasqueta; Cornelis Sier; Denise Hilling
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-14

8.  Clinical utility of radiomics at baseline rectal MRI to predict complete response of rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Iva Petkovska; Florent Tixier; Eduardo J Ortiz; Jennifer S Golia Pernicka; Viktoriya Paroder; David D Bates; Natally Horvat; James Fuqua; Juliana Schilsky; Marc J Gollub; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Harini Veeraraghavan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

9.  Diffusion weighted imaging improves diagnostic ability of MRI for determining complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Anuradha Chandramohan; Umar M Siddiqi; Rohin Mittal; Anu Eapen; Mark R Jesudason; Thomas S Ram; Ashish Singh; Dipti Masih
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-02-25

Review 10.  Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer: Current controversies and future directions.

Authors:  Fernando López-Campos; Margarita Martín-Martín; Roberto Fornell-Pérez; Juan Carlos García-Pérez; Javier Die-Trill; Raquel Fuentes-Mateos; Sergio López-Durán; José Domínguez-Rullán; Reyes Ferreiro; Alejandro Riquelme-Oliveira; Asunción Hervás-Morón; Felipe Couñago
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.