BACKGROUND: Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive cancer, few useful treatment options exist after relapse. Information concerning the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with SCLC is limited. METHODS: From April 2007 to October 2016, 318 patients with SCLC received chemotherapy at our institution. The medical records of patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel after first-line chemotherapy with platinum plus etoposide or irinotecan were retrospectively analyzed. The objectives were to investigate the frequency at which a carboplatin and paclitaxel regimen was administered to patients with SCLC in clinical practice, and to determine the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and tolerability of such agents. RESULTS: A total of 24 (7.5%) patients (male, n = 21; female, n = 3; median age, 67 years; performance status, 0-1/≥2, 15/8 patients; limited/extensive disease, 6/15 patients; sensitive/refractory relapse, 3/21 patients) were treated with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. This regimen was chosen due to interstitial lung disease (ILD) (n = 17), radiation pneumonitis (n = 3), combination with palliative radiation therapy (n = 2), and the presence of other cancers (n = 2). The response rate was 33.3%, and the disease control rate was 62.5%. The median PFS and overall survival were 4.1 and 8.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities observed included neutropenia (54.2%), anemia (4.2%), and thrombocytopenia (8.3%). With the exception of grade 3 neuropathies (n = 2), non-hematologic toxicities were mild. No patients experienced an acute exacerbation of ILD. CONCLUSION: A combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy is effective and feasible in patients with SCLC, especially in those with ILD.
BACKGROUND: Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive cancer, few useful treatment options exist after relapse. Information concerning the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with SCLC is limited. METHODS: From April 2007 to October 2016, 318 patients with SCLC received chemotherapy at our institution. The medical records of patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel after first-line chemotherapy with platinum plus etoposide or irinotecan were retrospectively analyzed. The objectives were to investigate the frequency at which a carboplatin and paclitaxel regimen was administered to patients with SCLC in clinical practice, and to determine the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and tolerability of such agents. RESULTS: A total of 24 (7.5%) patients (male, n = 21; female, n = 3; median age, 67 years; performance status, 0-1/≥2, 15/8 patients; limited/extensive disease, 6/15 patients; sensitive/refractory relapse, 3/21 patients) were treated with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. This regimen was chosen due to interstitial lung disease (ILD) (n = 17), radiation pneumonitis (n = 3), combination with palliative radiation therapy (n = 2), and the presence of other cancers (n = 2). The response rate was 33.3%, and the disease control rate was 62.5%. The median PFS and overall survival were 4.1 and 8.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities observed included neutropenia (54.2%), anemia (4.2%), and thrombocytopenia (8.3%). With the exception of grade 3 neuropathies (n = 2), non-hematologic toxicities were mild. No patients experienced an acute exacerbation of ILD. CONCLUSION: A combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy is effective and feasible in patients with SCLC, especially in those with ILD.