Literature DB >> 30528464

Residual Structure Accelerates Binding of Intrinsically Disordered ACTR by Promoting Efficient Folding upon Encounter.

Xiaorong Liu1, Jianlin Chen2, Jianhan Chen3.   

Abstract

Intrinsically n class="Disease">disordered proteins (IDPs) often fold into stable structures upon specific binding. The roles of residual structure of unbound IDPs in coupling binding and folding have been under much debate. While many studies emphasize the importance of conformational flexibility for IDP recognition, it was recently demonstrated that stabilization the N-terminal helix of intrinsically disordered ACTR accelerated its binding to another IDP, NCBD of the CREB-binding protein. To understand how enhancing ACTR helicity accelerates binding, we derived a series of topology-based coarse-grained models that mimicked various ACTR mutants with increasing helical contents and reproduced their NCBD binding affinities. Molecular dynamics simulations were then performed to sample hundreds of reversible coupled binding and folding transitions. The results show that increasing ACTR helicity does not alter the baseline mechanism of synergistic folding, which continues to follow "extended conformational selection" with multiple stages of selection and induced folding. Importantly, these coarse-grained models, while only calibrated based on binding thermodynamics, recapitulate the observed kinetic acceleration with increasing ACTR helicity. However, the residual helices do not enhance the association kinetics via more efficient seeding of productive collisions. Instead, they allow the nonspecific collision complexes to evolve more efficiently into the final bound and folded state, which is the primary source of accelerated association kinetics. Meanwhile, reduced dissociation kinetics with increasing ACTR helicity can be directly attributed to smaller entropic cost of forming the bound state. Altogether, this study provides important mechanistic insights into how residual structure may modulate thermodynamics and kinetics of IDP interactions.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding kinetics; conformational selection; coupled binding and folding; molecular dynamics; topology-based modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30528464      PMCID: PMC6687458          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  60 in total

1.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism.

Authors:  B A Shoemaker; J J Portman; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators.

Authors:  Stephen J Demarest; Maria Martinez-Yamout; John Chung; Hongwu Chen; Wei Xu; H Jane Dyson; Ronald M Evans; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Intrinsic disorder and protein function.

Authors:  A Keith Dunker; Celeste J Brown; J David Lawson; Lilia M Iakoucheva; Zoran Obradović
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.

Authors:  P E Wright; H J Dyson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Improved Gō-like models demonstrate the robustness of protein folding mechanisms towards non-native interactions.

Authors:  John Karanicolas; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  The origins of asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G.

Authors:  John Karanicolas; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  MMTSB Tool Set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology.

Authors:  Michael Feig; John Karanicolas; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.518

8.  Functional consequences of preorganized helical structure in the intrinsically disordered cell-cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1).

Authors:  Ewa A Bienkiewicz; Joshua N Adkins; Kevin J Lumb
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins.

Authors:  Lilia M Iakoucheva; Celeste J Brown; J David Lawson; Zoran Obradović; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Structured disorder and conformational selection.

Authors:  C J Tsai; B Ma; Y Y Sham; S Kumar; R Nussinov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-09-01
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Meng Gao; Junwen Xiong; Zhengding Su; Yongqi Huang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Investigating Intrinsically Disordered Proteins With Brownian Dynamics.

Authors:  Surl-Hee Ahn; Gary A Huber; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Coupled Binding and Helix Formation Monitored by Synchrotron-Radiation Circular Dichroism.

Authors:  Elin Karlsson; Eva Andersson; Nykola C Jones; Søren Vrønning Hoffmann; Per Jemth; Magnus Kjaergaard
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Intrinsically Disordered Transactivation Domains Bind to TAZ1 Domain of CBP via Diverse Mechanisms.

Authors:  Meng Gao; Jing Yang; Sen Liu; Zhengding Su; Yongqi Huang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Introducing intrinsic disorder reduces electrostatic steering in protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Meng Gao; Yue Han; Yifan Zeng; Zhengding Su; Yongqi Huang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.699

6.  Cancer-Associated Mutations Perturb the Disordered Ensemble and Interactions of the Intrinsically Disordered p53 Transactivation Domain.

Authors:  Lynn G Schrag; Xiaorong Liu; Indhujah Thevarajan; Om Prakash; Michal Zolkiewski; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.151

7.  Intrinsically Disordered Bacterial Polar Organizing Protein Z, PopZ, Interacts with Protein Binding Partners Through an N-terminal Molecular Recognition Feature.

Authors:  Christopher T Nordyke; Yasin M Ahmed; Ryan Z Puterbaugh; Grant R Bowman; Krisztina Varga
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.151

8.  Investigation into Early Steps of Actin Recognition by the Intrinsically Disordered N-WASP Domain V.

Authors:  Maud Chan-Yao-Chong; Dominique Durand; Tâp Ha-Duong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Connecting the αα-hubs: same fold, disordered ligands, new functions.

Authors:  Lasse Staby; Katrine Bugge; Rasmus Greve Falbe-Hansen; Edoardo Salladini; Karen Skriver; Birthe B Kragelund
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 10.  Advanced Sampling Methods for Multiscale Simulation of Disordered Proteins and Dynamic Interactions.

Authors:  Xiping Gong; Yumeng Zhang; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.