Literature DB >> 30528400

Immediate-access grafts provide comparable patency to standard grafts, with fewer reinterventions and catheter-related complications.

Jason K Wagner1, Ellen Dillavou2, Uttara Nag2, Adham Abou Ali3, Sandra Truong3, Rabih Chaer3, Eric Hager3, Theodore Yuo3, Michel Makaroun3, Efthymios D Avgerinos3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No independent comparisons, with midterm follow-up, of standard arteriovenous grafts (SAVGs) and immediate-access arteriovenous grafts (IAAVGs) exist. The goal of this study was to compare "real-world" performance of SAVGs and IAAVGs.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent placement of a hemodialysis graft between November 2014 and April 2016 were retrospectively identified from the electronic medical record and Vascular Quality Initiative database at two tertiary centers. Only primary graft placements were included for analysis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of graft implanted. Patients' comorbidities, graft configuration, operative characteristics, and follow-up were collected and analyzed with respect to primary and secondary patency. Additional outcomes included graft-related complications, time to first cannulation, time to tunneled catheter removal, catheter-related complications, and overall survival. Patency was determined from the time of the index procedure; χ2, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses were used, with the P value set as significant at < .05.
RESULTS: There were 210 grafts identified, 148 SAVGs and 62 IAAVGs. At baseline, the patients' characteristics were similar between groups, except for a greater prevalence of preoperative central venous occlusions in the IAAVG group (16.3% vs 6.8%; P < .04). Of the IAAVG group, 50 were Acuseal (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) and 12 were Flixene (Atrium Medical Corporation, Hudson, NH). Primary patency was similar at both 1 year (SAVG, 39.4%; IAAVG, 56.7%; P = .4) and 18 months (SAVG, 29.0%; IAAVG, 43.7%; P = .4). Secondary patency was similar at 1 year (SAVG, 50.7%; IAAVG, 52.1%; P = .73) and 18 months (SAVG, 42.3%; IAAVG, 46.3%; P = .73). Overall survival was 48% at 24 months. IAAVG patients required fewer overall additional procedures to maintain patency (mean number of procedures, 0.99 for SAVGs vs 0.61 for IAAVGs; P = .025). There was no difference in occurrence of steal syndrome (SAVG, 6.8%; IAAVG, 8.1%; P = .74) or graft infection (SAVG, 19.0%; IAAVG, 12.0%; P = .276). Seventy-five percent of all grafts were successfully cannulated, with shorter median time to first cannulation in the IAAVG group (6 days; interquartile range [IQR], 1-19 days) compared with the SAVG group (31 days; IQR, 26-47 days; P < .01). Of all pre-existing catheters, 65.75% were removed, with a shorter median time until catheter removal in the IAAVG cohort at 34 days (IQR, 22-50 days) vs 49 days (IQR, 39-67 days) in the SAVG group (P < .01). Catheter-related complications occurred less frequently in the IAAVG group (16.4% vs 2.9%; P < .045).
CONCLUSIONS: IAAVGs allow earlier cannulation and tunneled catheter removal, thereby significantly decreasing catheter-related complications. Patency and infection rates were similar between SAVGs and IAAVGs, but fewer secondary procedures were performed in IAAVGs.
Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acuseal; Arteriovenous graft; Catheter infection; Dialysis catheter; Flixene; Immediate-access graft

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30528400      PMCID: PMC6394225          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

1.  Long-term complication and patency rates of Vectra and IMPRA Carboflo vascular access grafts with aggressive monitoring, surveillance and endovascular management.

Authors:  S K Kakkos; D Topalidis; R Haddad; G K Haddad; A D Shepard
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 2.  Early cannulation grafts for haemodialysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julien Al Shakarchi; Graeme Houston; Nicholas Inston
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.283

Review 3.  Recommended standards for reports dealing with arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses.

Authors:  Anton N Sidawy; Richard Gray; Anatole Besarab; Mitchell Henry; Enrico Ascher; Michael Silva; Arnold Miller; Larry Scher; Scott Trerotola; Roger T Gregory; Robert B Rutherford; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  A randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of early cannulation arteriovenous grafts versus tunneled central venous catheters in patients requiring urgent vascular access for hemodialysis.

Authors:  Emma Aitken; Peter Thomson; Leigh Bainbridge; Ram Kasthuri; Belinda Mohr; David Kingsmore
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Early cannulation prosthetic graft (Acuseal) for arteriovenous access: a useful option to provide a personal vascular access solution.

Authors:  Emma L Aitken; Andrew J Jackson; David B Kingsmore
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.283

6.  Arteriovenous grafts are associated with earlier catheter removal and fewer catheter days in the United States Renal Data System population.

Authors:  Andrew E Leake; Theodore H Yuo; Timothy Wu; Larry Fish; Ellen D Dillavou; Rabih A Chaer; Steven A Leers; Michel S Makaroun
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Equivalent secondary patency rates of upper extremity Vectra Vascular Access Grafts and transposed brachial-basilic fistulas with aggressive access surveillance and endovascular treatment.

Authors:  Stavros K Kakkos; Tanja Andrzejewski; Joseph A Haddad; Georges K Haddad; Daniel J Reddy; Timothy J Nypaver; Martha M Scully; Donna L Schmid
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Prospective surveillance for primary bloodstream infections occurring in Canadian hemodialysis units.

Authors:  Geoffrey Taylor; Denise Gravel; Lynn Johnston; John Embil; Donna Holton; Shirley Paton
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  When should a patient receive an arteriovenous graft rather than a fistula?

Authors:  Ho-Won Lee; Michael Allon
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Vascular access in haemodialysis patients: a modifiable risk factor for bacteraemia and death.

Authors:  P C Thomson; C M Stirling; C C Geddes; S T Morris; R A Mactier
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2007-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.