Stephanie L Garrett1, Richard E Kennedy2, Patricia Sawyer2, Courtney P Williams2, Cynthia J Brown2, Richard M Allman3. 1. Emory University School of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: sgarre6@emory.edu. 2. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Examining cultural differences in assessment of cognitive/functional disability among older Americans is needed. This analysis examined associations between day-to-day function, measured by activities of daily living (ADL), and cognition, measured by CLOX scores, among older African American (AA) and non-Hispanic White (nHW) community-dwelling women and men. METHODS: Design- Cross-sectional. SETTING: Homes of community-dwelling older adults. Participants- 893 Medicare beneficiaries >65 living in west-central Alabama, without diagnoses of dementia, who were participants in the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Study of Aging, and who had complete data. Measurements- Physical function was assessed by self-reported ADL difficulty; cognitive function by CLOX, a clock drawing-task. Multivariable, linear regression models were used to examine associations within race/sex specific groups. RESULTS: After controlling for socio-demographic factors and comorbidities, CLOX1 scores were inversely and significantly correlated with ADL for AA men (β = -0.205, P = 0.003). CLOX2 scores were similarly associated with ADL and IADL for the total group (β = -0.118, P = 0.001, and β = -0.180, P < 0.001, respectively); for ADL, significant associations were seen for AA men and nHW women (β = -0.203, P = 0.004, and β = -0.139, P = 0.02, respectively) and, for IADL, in AA women and men (β = -0.156, P = 0.03, and β = -0.24, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: While African American women reported the highest difficulty with ADLs and IADLs among all race/sex groups, CLOX1 scores were correlated with ADL for AA men only. CLOX1 may have limitations to identify functional disability for older AA women. [Word Count = 234].
OBJECTIVE: Examining cultural differences in assessment of cognitive/functional disability among older Americans is needed. This analysis examined associations between day-to-day function, measured by activities of daily living (ADL), and cognition, measured by CLOX scores, among older African American (AA) and non-Hispanic White (nHW) community-dwelling women and men. METHODS: Design- Cross-sectional. SETTING: Homes of community-dwelling older adults. Participants- 893 Medicare beneficiaries >65 living in west-central Alabama, without diagnoses of dementia, who were participants in the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Study of Aging, and who had complete data. Measurements- Physical function was assessed by self-reported ADL difficulty; cognitive function by CLOX, a clock drawing-task. Multivariable, linear regression models were used to examine associations within race/sex specific groups. RESULTS: After controlling for socio-demographic factors and comorbidities, CLOX1 scores were inversely and significantly correlated with ADL for AA men (β = -0.205, P = 0.003). CLOX2 scores were similarly associated with ADL and IADL for the total group (β = -0.118, P = 0.001, and β = -0.180, P < 0.001, respectively); for ADL, significant associations were seen for AA men and nHW women (β = -0.203, P = 0.004, and β = -0.139, P = 0.02, respectively) and, for IADL, in AA women and men (β = -0.156, P = 0.03, and β = -0.24, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: While African American women reported the highest difficulty with ADLs and IADLs among all race/sex groups, CLOX1 scores were correlated with ADL for AA men only. CLOX1 may have limitations to identify functional disability for older AA women. [Word Count = 234].
Authors: Jason E Schillerstrom; Patricia Sawyer Baker; Richard M Allman; Bunja Rungruang; Edward Zamrini; Donald R Royall Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2007-06-19 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: M C Carlson; L P Fried; Q L Xue; K Bandeen-Roche; S L Zeger; J Brandt Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Mary Ganguli; Eric Rodriguez; Benoit Mulsant; Stephanie Richards; Rajesh Pandav; Joni Vander Bilt; Hiroko H Dodge; Gary P Stoehr; Judith Saxton; Richard K Morycz; Robert T Rubin; Barry Farkas; Steven T DeKosky Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Gad A Marshall; Sietske A M Sikkes; Rebecca E Amariglio; Jennifer R Gatchel; Dorene M Rentz; Keith A Johnson; Oliver Langford; Chung-Kai Sun; Michael C Donohue; Rema Raman; Paul S Aisen; Reisa A Sperling; Douglas R Galasko Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2020-10-30