Literature DB >> 30527589

Dental pulp stem cells in chitosan/gelatin scaffolds for enhanced orofacial bone regeneration.

Athina Bakopoulou1, Αnthie Georgopoulou2, Ioannis Grivas3, Chryssa Bekiari3, Oleg Prymak4, Κateryna Loza4, Matthias Epple4, George C Papadopoulos3, Petros Koidis1, Μaria Chatzinikolaidou5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Biomimetic chitosan/gelatin (CS/Gel) scaffolds have attracted great interest in tissue engineering of several tissues. However, limited information exists regarding the potential of combining CS/Gel scaffolds with oral cells, such as dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), to produce customized constructs targeting alveolar/orofacial bone reconstruction, which has been the aim of the present study.
METHODS: Two scaffold types, designated as CS/Gel-0.1 and CS/Gel-1, were fabricated using 0.1 and 1% (v/v) respectively of the crosslinker glutaraldehyde (GTA). Scaffolds (n=240) were seeded with DPSCs with/without pre-exposure to recombinant human BMP-2. In vitro assessment included DPSCs characterization (flow cytometry), evaluation of viability/proliferation (live/dead staining, metabolic-based tests), osteo/odontogenic gene expression analysis (qRT-PCR) and structural/chemical characterization (scanning electron microscopy, SEM; energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, EDX; X-ray powder diffraction, XRD; thermogravimetry, TG). In vivo assessment included implantation of DPSC-seeded scaffolds in immunocompromised mice, followed by histology and SEM-EDX. Statistical analysis employed one/two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (significance for p<0.05).
RESULTS: Both scaffolds supported cell viability/proliferation over 14 days in culture, showing extensive formation of a hydroxyapatite-rich nanocrystalline calcium phosphate phase. Differential expression patterns indicated GTA concentration to significantly affect the expression of osteo/odontogenic genes, with CS/Gel-0.1 scaffolds being more effective in upregulating DSPP, IBSP and Osterix. In vivo analysis demonstrated time-dependent production of a nanocrystalline, mineralized matrix at 6, 8 and 10 weeks, being more prominent in constructs bearing rhBMP-2 pre-treated cells. The latter showed higher amounts of osteoid and fully mineralized bone, as well as empty space reduction. SIGNIFICANCE: These results reveal a promising strategy for orofacial bone tissue engineering.
Copyright © 2018 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinspired chitosan/gelatin scaffolds; Dental pulp stem cells; Orofacial bone regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30527589     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  14 in total

Review 1.  Sinking Our Teeth in Getting Dental Stem Cells to Clinics for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Sarah Hani Shoushrah; Janis Lisa Transfeld; Christian Horst Tonk; Dominik Büchner; Steffen Witzleben; Martin A Sieber; Margit Schulze; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Polysaccharide-Based Systems for Targeted Stem Cell Differentiation and Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Markus Witzler; Dominik Büchner; Sarah Hani Shoushrah; Patrick Babczyk; Juliana Baranova; Steffen Witzleben; Edda Tobiasch; Margit Schulze
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 3.  Mesenchymal stem cells: amazing remedies for bone and cartilage defects.

Authors:  Parisa Kangari; Tahereh Talaei-Khozani; Iman Razeghian-Jahromi; Mahboobeh Razmkhah
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 4.  Priming strategies for controlling stem cell fate: Applications and challenges in dental tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Si-Yuan Zhang; Jia-Yin Ren; Bo Yang
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 5.  Cells and material-based strategies for regenerative endodontics.

Authors:  Zain Siddiqui; Amanda M Acevedo-Jake; Alexandra Griffith; Nurten Kadincesme; Kinga Dabek; Dana Hindi; Ka Kyung Kim; Yoshifumi Kobayashi; Emi Shimizu; Vivek Kumar
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 6.  Proteins and Peptides as Important Modifiers of the Polymer Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications-A Review.

Authors:  Katarzyna Klimek; Grazyna Ginalska
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 7.  Nanomaterials for Periodontal Tissue Engineering: Chitosan-Based Scaffolds. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dorina Lauritano; Luisa Limongelli; Giulia Moreo; Gianfranco Favia; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Synthesis and characterization of PLGA/HAP scaffolds with DNA-functionalised calcium phosphate nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Viktoriya Sokolova; Kathrin Kostka; K T Shalumon; Oleg Prymak; Jyh-Ping Chen; Matthias Epple
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Polymeric Gelatin Scaffolds Affect Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation and Its Diverse Applications in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chia-Yu Wang; Po-Da Hong; Ding-Han Wang; Juin-Hong Cherng; Shu-Jen Chang; Cheng-Che Liu; Tong-Jing Fang; Yi-Wen Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The Marine Polysaccharide Ulvan Confers Potent Osteoinductive Capacity to PCL-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Stefanos Kikionis; Efstathia Ioannou; Eleni Aggelidou; Leto-Aikaterini Tziveleka; Efterpi Demiri; Athina Bakopoulou; Spiros Zinelis; Aristeidis Kritis; Vassilios Roussis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.