Literature DB >> 30527466

Publication Fate of Abstracts Presented at Four British Surgical Meetings: An 11-Year Follow-Up.

Alexander Light1, Maria Dadabhoy2, Abigail Burrows2, Madura Nandakumar2, Tanya Gupta2, Sandeep Karthikeyan2, Allen Daniel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for research is publication within a peer-reviewed journal. There is a discrepancy between the number of abstracts presented at scientific meetings and the number published as full articles. We identified publication rates for the 2012 meetings of four British surgical societies. These were the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain & Ireland (ASGBI), the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the British Transplantation Society (BTS), and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI). We also compared publication rates with these societies' 2001 meetings and identified univariate factors associated with publication.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed was searched to identify publications stemming from meeting abstracts. We extracted abstract characteristics to identify factors associated with publication and also characteristics of subsequent publications to enable comparison.
RESULTS: Publication rates were 24.1% (ASGBI), 24.6% (BTS), 21.7% (ACPGBI), and 39.4% (Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland). Rates for ASGBI, BTS, and ACPGBI meetings were significantly lower compared to 2001 meetings (P = 0.001-0.026). Mean time to publication was 12.1-22.0 mo. Mean 5-y impact factor differed significantly between meetings (P = 0.001), with the BTS meeting having the highest mean 5-y impact factor (4.658). Factors associated with publication included being an oral presentation (ASGBI P = 0.001), multi-institution study (ASGBI P = 0.003), or randomized-controlled trial (BTS P = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced publication rates may represent increased acceptance of low-quality abstracts at meetings or a more competitive journal submission process. Further data are required to strengthen conclusions. Nonetheless, authors and meeting organizers should push for higher quality abstracts to promote future peer-reviewed journal publication.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conferences; Impact factor; Meeting abstracts; Publications; Scientific meetings; Surgery

Year:  2018        PMID: 30527466     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  2 in total

1.  Publication outcome of research presented at the European Congress of Endocrinology: a web scraping-based analysis and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Emre Sedar Saygili; Bulent Okan Yildiz
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  The publication fate of abstracts presented at the Medical Library Association conferences.

Authors:  Rachel J Hinrichs; Mirian Ramirez; Mahasin Ameen
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.