Literature DB >> 30527258

In healthy adults, resistant maltodextrin produces a greater change in fecal bifidobacteria counts and increases stool wet weight: a double-blind, randomized, controlled crossover study.

Alyssa M Burns1, Rebecca J Solch2, Jennifer C Dennis-Wall3, Maria Ukhanova4, Carmelo Nieves5, Volker Mai6, Mary C Christman7, Dennis T Gordon8, Bobbi Langkamp-Henken9.   

Abstract

Dietary fiber stimulates the growth of potentially beneficial bacteria (eg, bifidobacteria), yet most Americans do not meet daily fiber recommendations. Resistant maltodextrin (RMD), a fermentable functional fiber, may help individuals meet total fiber recommendations and potentially increase bifidobacteria. It was hypothesized that fecal bifidobacteria counts/ng fecal DNA would increase after adding 25 g RMD to inadequate fiber diets of healthy adults. In this double-blind, controlled crossover study, 51 participants (26.3 ± 6.8 years, mean ± SD) were randomized to consume 0, 15, and 25 g RMD daily for 3 weeks followed by a 2-week washout. Participants collected all stools for 2 days at weeks 0 and 3 of each intervention for stool wet weight (WW) measurements and fecal bifidobacteria counts. Weekly 24-hour dietary recalls assessed total fiber intake. Only 25 g RMD resulted in a change (final minus baseline) in bifidobacteria that was significant compared with 0 g (0.17 ± 0.09 vs -0.17 ± 0.09 log10[counts], respectively, mean ± SEM, P = .008). Stool WW increased only with 25 g (150 ± 11 vs baseline 121±11 g/d; P = .011). Mean daily total fiber intake (including RMD) was significantly higher (both P< .001) with 15 g (17.8 ± 0.6 g/1000 kcal or 4184 kJ) and 25 g (25.3 ± 1.1 g/1000 kcal) compared with 0 g RMD (8.4±0.4 g/1000 kcal). Mean daily total fiber intakes exceeded recommendations (14 g/1000 kcal) with 15 and 25 g of RMD, and 25 g RMD increased fecal bifidobacteria counts and stool WW, suggesting health benefits from increasing total fiber intake.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bifidobacteria; Gastrointestinal function; Healthy adults; Resistant maltodextrin; Stool wet weight

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30527258     DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2018.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res        ISSN: 0271-5317            Impact factor:   3.315


  12 in total

Review 1.  Validity of food additive maltodextrin as placebo and effects on human gut physiology: systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Rawan Almutairi; Abigail Raffner Basson; Fabio Cominelli; Pamela Wearsh; Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.865

2.  Effects of Resistant Dextrin from Potato Starch on the Growth Dynamics of Selected Co-Cultured Strains of Gastrointestinal Bacteria and the Activity of Fecal Enzymes.

Authors:  Michał Włodarczyk; Katarzyna Śliżewska; Renata Barczyńska; Janusz Kapuśniak
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Resistant Maltodextrin Consumption in a Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial Induces Specific Changes in Potentially Beneficial Gut Bacteria.

Authors:  Volker Mai; Alyssa M Burns; Rebecca J Solch; Jennifer C Dennis-Wall; Maria Ukhanova; Bobbi Langkamp-Henken
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  The effect of inulin and resistant maltodextrin on weight loss during energy restriction: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded intervention.

Authors:  Anne Lundby Hess; Alfonso Benítez-Páez; Trine Blædel; Lesli Hingstrup Larsen; Jose Ramón Iglesias; Carmen Madera; Yolanda Sanz; Thomas Meinert Larsen
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Pyrodextrin enhances intestinal function through changing the intestinal microbiota composition and metabolism in early weaned piglets.

Authors:  Lihui Zhu; Rongrong Liao; Weilong Tu; Yonghong Lu; Xuan Cai
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Uncertainties in estimating SARS-CoV-2 prevalence by wastewater-based epidemiology.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Shuxin Zhang; Jiahua Shi; Stephen P Luby; Guangming Jiang
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 13.273

Review 7.  Efficiency of Resistant Starch and Dextrins as Prebiotics: A Review of the Existing Evidence and Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michał Włodarczyk; Katarzyna Śliżewska
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Validation of a novel quality of life questionnaire: the Digestion-associated Quality of Life Questionnaire (DQLQ).

Authors:  Matthew Beke; Alyssa M Burns; Sydney Weir; Rebecca J Solch; Taylor C Judkins; Carmelo Nieves; Bobbi Langkamp-Henken
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Impact of Glucosamine Supplementation on Gut Health.

Authors:  Jessica M Moon; Peter Finnegan; Richard A Stecker; Hanna Lee; Kayla M Ratliff; Ralf Jäger; Martin Purpura; Carolyn M Slupsky; Maria L Marco; Craig J Wissent; Jason Theodosakis; Chad M Kerksick
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Microbiota and Lifestyle: A Special Focus on Diet.

Authors:  Noemí Redondo-Useros; Esther Nova; Natalia González-Zancada; Ligia E Díaz; Sonia Gómez-Martínez; Ascensión Marcos
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.