| Literature DB >> 30526525 |
Xiangxue Zhang1,2, Chengdong Xu3, Gexin Xiao4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) has become a substantial threat recently. However few studies have quantified spatiotemporal heterogeneity of HFMD and detected spatiotemporal interactive effect of potential driving factors on this disease.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian space-time hierarchy model; Hand, Foot, and mouth disease; Meteorological factors; Socio-economic factors; Spatiotemporal risk
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30526525 PMCID: PMC6286567 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3546-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Geographic location of the Henan province in China, and cumulative monthly incidence of HFMD in children from 2012 to 2013. (The administrative map in the figure was obtained from the Resource and Environment Data Cloud Platform (http://www.resdc.cn))
Fig. 2Temporal evolution in potential meteorological factors from 2012 to 2013
Fig. 3The posterior means of the temporal relative risks (exp(bt + v)) of HFMD in children from 2012 to 2013
Fig. 4The posterior means of the spatial relative risks (RRs) (exp(s)) of HFMD in children for each county, Henan province. (The administrative map in the figure was obtained from the Resource and Environment Data Cloud Platform (http://www.resdc.cn))
Fig. 5Map of the hot spots and cold spots of HFMD in each county of Henan Province. (The administrative map in the figure was obtained from the Resource and Environment Data Cloud Platform (http://www.resdc.cn))
The quantified posterior means and RR of all coefficients in BSTHM
| Meteorological factors | Posterior mean (95% CI) (100%) | RR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Average temperature (°C) | 4.09 (1.12–7.27) | 1.04 (1.01–1.08) |
| Relative humidity (%) | 1.77 (0.68–2.77) | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) |
| Air pressure (hPa) | 0.89 (0.36–1.36) | 1.01 (1.00–1.014) |
| Precipitation (mm) | −0.12 (− 0.23–− 0.01) | 0.999 (0.998–1.00) |
| Sun hour (h) | −0.02 (− 0.25–0.20) | 1.00 (0.998–1.002) |
| Wind speed (m/s) | 2.21 (−13.02–16.69) | 1.02 (0.88–1.18) |
The estimated coefficients of socio-economic factors in SLM
| Socio-economic variables | Coefficient | Std. Error | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio of urban to rural population | 0.16 | 0.05 | 3.51 | 0.00** |
| Proportion of the tertiary industry | 0.02 | 0.01 | 2.24 | 0.03* |
| Per capita GDP | 1.10 | 0.33 | 3.30 | 0.00** |
| Proportion of the second industry | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.73 | 0.08 |
| High school penetration rate | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 0.78 |
| Per capita income of farmers | −4.73 | 5.35 | −0.88 | 0.38 |
| Population density of children under five | −0.05 | 0.03 | −1.63 | 0.10 |
**statistical significance level: 0.01
*statistical significance level: 0.05