Literature DB >> 30525497

Microbial Mercury Methylation in Aquatic Environments: A Critical Review of Published Field and Laboratory Studies.

Olof Regnell1, Carl J Watras2,3.   

Abstract

Methylmercury (MeHg) is an environmental contaminant of concern because it biomagnifies in aquatic food webs and poses a health hazard to aquatic biota, piscivorous wildlife and humans. The dominant source of MeHg to freshwater systems is the methylation of inorganic Hg (IHg) by anaerobic microorganisms; and it is widely agreed that in situ rates of Hg methylation depend on two general factors: the activity of Hg methylators and their uptake of IHg. A large body of research has focused on the biogeochemical processes that regulate these two factors in nature; and studies conducted within the past ten years have made substantial progress in identifying the genetic basis for intracellular methylation and defining the processes that govern the cellular uptake of IHg. Current evidence indicates that all Hg methylating anaerobes possess the gene pair hgcAB that encodes proteins essential for Hg methylation. These genes are found in a large variety of anaerobes, including iron reducers and methanogens; but sulfate reduction is the metabolic process most often reported to show strong links to MeHg production. The uptake of Hg substrate prior to methylation may occur by passive or active transport, or by a combination of both. Competitive inhibition of Hg uptake by Zn speaks in favor of active transport and suggests that essential metal transporters are involved. Shortly after its formation, MeHg is typically released from cells, but the efflux mechanisms are unknown. Although methylation facilitates Hg depuration from the cell, evidence suggests that the hgcAB genes are not induced or favored by Hg contamination. Instead, high MeHg production can be linked to high Hg bioavailability as a result of the formation of Hg(SH)2, HgS nanoparticles, and Hg-thiol complexes. It is also possible that sulfidic conditions require strong essential metal uptake systems that inadvertently bring Hg into the cytoplasm of Hg methylating microbes. In comparison with freshwaters, Hg methylation in open ocean waters appears less restricted to anoxic environments. It does seem to occur mainly in oxygen deficient zones (ODZs), and possibly within anaerobic microzones of settling organic matter, but MeHg (CH3Hg+) and Me2Hg ((CH3)2Hg) have been shown to form also in surface water samples from the euphotic zone. Future studies may disclose whether several different pathways lead to Hg methylation in marine waters and explain why Me2Hg is a significant Hg species in oceans but seemingly not in most freshwaters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30525497     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Two constructed wetlands within a Mediterranean natural park immersed in an agrolandscape reduce most heavy metal water concentrations and dampen the majority of pesticide presence.

Authors:  Maria A Rodrigo; Eric Puche; Nuria Carabal; Sergio Armenta; Francesc A Esteve-Turrillas; Javier Jiménez; Fernando Juan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.190

2.  Correlation Analysis of DNA Methylation in the von Willebrand Factor Promoter Region and the Risk of Unexplained Recurrent Hemophilia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jing Dong; Jie Li; Ling Yang; Qiuhong Kong; Zhirong Zhang; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.009

3.  Short-Term Legacy Effects of Mercury Contamination on Plant Growth and nifH-Harboring Microbial Community in Rice Paddy Soil.

Authors:  Hye Rim Hyun; Hakwon Yoon; Eun Sun Lyou; Jin Ju Kim; Sae Yun Kwon; Tae Kwon Lee
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 4.  Biotic formation of methylmercury: A bio-physico-chemical conundrum.

Authors:  Andrea G Bravo; Claudia Cosio
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.745

5.  The fluorescence of a mercury probe based on osthol.

Authors:  Guangyan Luo; Zhishu Zeng; Lin Zhang; Zhu Tao; Qianjun Zhang
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.883

6.  Versatile artificial mer operons in Escherichia coli towards whole cell biosensing and adsorption of mercury.

Authors:  Nai-Xing Zhang; Yan Guo; Hui Li; Xue-Qin Yang; Chao-Xian Gao; Chang-Ye Hui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Inputs of Terrestrial Dissolved Organic Matter Enhance Bacterial Production and Methylmercury Formation in Oxic Coastal Water.

Authors:  Juanjo Rodríguez; Agneta Andersson; Erik Björn; Sari Timonen; Sonia Brugel; Aleksandra Skrobonja; Owen Rowe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Development of a bioavailable Hg(II) sensing system based on MerR-regulated visual pigment biosynthesis.

Authors:  Yan Guo; Chang-Ye Hui; Lisa Liu; Min-Peng Chen; Hong-Ying Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Spatiotemporal effects of interacting water quality constituents on mercury in a common prey fish in a large, perturbed, subtropical wetland.

Authors:  Peter Kalla; Michael Cyterski; Daniel Scheidt; Jeffrey Minucci
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 10.753

10.  Methylmercury Production and Degradation under Light and Dark Conditions in the Water Column of the Hells Canyon Reservoirs, USA.

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Todd P Luxton; Christopher D Knightes; Vishal Shah
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.218

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.