| Literature DB >> 30524484 |
Xinrui Zheng1, Ye Liao1, Jiu Wang1, Shijie Hu1, Gudepalya Renukaiah Rudramurthy2, Mallappa Kumara Swamy3, Komdur Channabasavaraju Rohit4, Yangang Wang1.
Abstract
Microglial cells, upon hyperactivation, produce proinflammatory cytokines and other oxidative stress mediators causing neuroinflammation, which is associated with the progress of many neurodegenerative diseases. Suppressing the microglial activation has hence been used as an approach for treating such diseases. In this study, the antineuroinflammatory effect of simvastatin was examined in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated rat C6 glioma cells. The cell proliferation and cytotoxic effect of LPS and simvastatin on C6 glioma cells was evaluated by (MTT) assay. Neuroinflammation was induced in differentiated cell lines by treatment with 3.125 μg/mL of LPS for 12 h. Upon induction, the cell lines were treated with different concentrations (3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μM) of simvastatin and incubated in a humidified CO2 incubator for 24 to 48 h. The optimum concentrations of LPS and simvastatin were found to be 3.125 μg/mL and 25 μM, respectively, with a cell viability of more than 90% at 24 h postincubation. Furthermore, proinflammatory marker expression was analyzed by flow cytometry and showed a decrease in interferon-γ, interleukin 6, nuclear factor-κB p65, and tumor necrosis factor-α in simvastatin-treated and LPS-induced neuroinflammatory cells, and the mean fluorescent values were found to be 21.75 ± 0.76, 20.9 ± 1.90, 19.72 ± 1.29, and 16.82 ± 0.97, respectively, as compared to the untreated cells. Thus, we show that simvastatin has the potential to regulate the anti-inflammatory response in microglial cells upon LPS challenge. Hence, simvastatin can be employed as a potent anti-inflammatory drug against neuroinflammatory diseases and neurodegenerative disorders.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30524484 PMCID: PMC6247388 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9691085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Cytotoxic effect of LPS, simvastatin, and LPS+ simvastatin on rat C6 glioma cell lines at different concentrations and incubation times. Data is expressed as the mean ± SD (each treatment, n = 3). ns Nonsignificant. ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 in comparison with control/untreated cells by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparison.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation Time |
|
| |
|
| |||
| Camptothecin | 15 | 50.45 ± 0.095 | 27.14 ± 0.109 |
|
| |||
| Control/untreated cell line | - | 100 ± 0.005 | 100 ± 0.005 |
|
| |||
| LPS | 3.125 | 99.89 ± 0.127ns | 95.20 ± 0.092 |
| 6.25 | 96.90 ± 0.119 | 89.10 ± 0.076 | |
| 12.5 | 94.60 ± 0.085 | 85.20 ± 0.088 | |
| 25 | 90.10 ± 0.100 | 77.50 ± 0.067 | |
| 50 | 87.30 ± 0.066 | 72.80 ± 0.089 | |
| 100 | 85.50 ± 0.097 | 69.50 ± 0.046 | |
|
| |||
| Simvastatin | 6.25 | 98.10 ± 0.109 | 85.80 ± 0.097 |
| 12.5 | 96.30 ± 0.098 | 83.00 ± 0.086 | |
| 25 | 92.17 ± 0.078 | 79.30 ± 0.101 | |
| 50 | 90.07 ± 0.102 | 75.20 ± 0.098 | |
| 100 | 86.90 ± 0.097 | 70.80 ± 0.095 | |
|
| |||
| LPS (3.125 | 6.25 | 98.00 ± 0.096 | 81.25 ± 0.083 |
| 12.5 | 94.80 ± 0.078 | 78.75 ± 0.066 | |
| 25 | 90.27 ± 0.099 | 73.00 ± 0.047 | |
| 50 | 87.00 ± 0.104 | 66.70 ± 0.072 | |
| 100 | 84.90 ± 0.112 | 64.80 ± 0.109 | |
Figure 1Comparative analysis of cytotoxic effect of drugs on C6 glioma cell line after 24 h of incubation (20x magnification). (a) Control (untreated) cell line, (b) treated with camptothecin, (c) treated with LPS (3.125 μg/mL) + simvastatin (25 μM).
Figure 2Histogram depicting the percentage cell viability of LPS (3.125 μg/mL) + simvastatin (25 μM) treated C6 glioma cell lines after 24 and 48 h of incubation. Data are reported as mean ± SD of 3 independent replicates. ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 in comparison with control/untreated cells by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparison.
Figure 3Histogram (a) and fluorescent overlay graph (b) representing the effect of simvastatin (25 μM) on LPS (3.125 μg/mL) induced rat glioblastoma cell line (C6) on the expression level of IFN-γ. Data are reported as mean ± SD of 3 independent replicates. ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 in comparison with control/untreated cells by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparison.
Figure 4Histogram (a) and fluorescent overlay graph (b) representing the effect of simvastatin (25 μM) on LPS (3.125 μg/mL) induced rat glioblastoma cell line (C6) on the expression level of IL-6. Data are reported as mean ± SD of 3 independent replicates. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 in comparison with control/untreated cells by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparison.
Figure 5Histogram (a) and fluorescent overlay graph (b) representing the effect of simvastatin (25 μM) on LPS (3.125 μg/mL) induced rat glioblastoma cell line (C6) on the expression level of NF-κB. Data are reported as mean ± SD of 3 independent replicates. ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 in comparison with control/untreated cells by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparison.
Figure 6Histogram (a) and fluorescent overlay graph (b) representing the effect of simvastatin (25 μM) on LPS (3.125 μg/mL) induced rat glioblastoma cell line (C6) on the expression level of TNF-α. Data are reported as mean ± SD of 3 independent replicates. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 in comparison with control/untreated cells by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparison.