| Literature DB >> 30524290 |
Fang Li1,2, Chen Gao1,2, Ping Yan1,2, Meng Zhang1,2, Yinghao Wang1,2, Yue Hu1,2, Xiaoyun Wu1,2,3,4, Xuanjun Wang1,2,3,4, Jun Sheng1,2,3.
Abstract
(-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), which is the most abundant catechin in green tea, has many potential health benefits, including decreased weight gain and/or adipose tissue weight. Suggested mechanisms for body weight reduction by EGCG include: (1) a decrease in calorie intake and (2) activation of AMPK in liver, skeletal muscle, and white adipose tissue. However, only one study supports the AMPK hypothesis. To determine the role of AMPK in EGCG-induced reduction of body weight, we administrated 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg per day to mice, together with a high-fat diet (HFD), for 20 weeks. EGCG had a significant effect on obesity and decrease in epididymal adipose tissue weight, and also affected serum lipid characteristics, including triglyceride, cholesterol (CHOL), and high- and low-density lipoprotein CHOL (HDL-C, LDL-C) concentrations. In addition, EGCG increased the excretion of free fatty acids from feces. By measuring the mRNA expression levels of genes involved in lipid metabolism, we found that EGCG inhibited the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of de novo fatty acids (acc1, fas, scd1, c/ebpβ, pparγ, and srebp1) and increased the expression of genes associated with lipolysis (hsl) and lipid oxidization in white adipose tissue, in both the HFD and the EGCG groups. However, EGCG significantly increased the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of de novo fatty acids compared with the HFD group. Increased AMPK activity was found in both subcutaneous and epididymal adipose tissues. In conclusion, EGCG can decrease obesity and epididymal white adipose tissue weight in mice, only partially via activation of AMPK.Entities:
Keywords: AMPK; EGCG; gene expression; obesity; white adipose tissues
Year: 2018 PMID: 30524290 PMCID: PMC6262053 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
qRT-PCR primers used in this study.
| Gene name | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| GTGCCAGTTTCGATCCGTAGA | GGCCAGCATCGTGTAGATGA | |
| ACAAGGCCAAGATGCGCAAC | TTCCGCAGGGTGCTGAGCT | |
| AATCACCGCAGACGACAG | ACGCCTTTCATAACACATTCC | |
| TGTGGCCTCATTCCTCCTAC | TCGTGGATGTTGGTGGAGCT | |
| CCCTGCCATTGTTAAGACC | TGCTGCTGTTCCTGTTTTC | |
| GGAGGTGGTGATAGCCGGTAT | TGGGTAATCCATAGAGCCCAG | |
| CGCTCGTCAGGTTCTTATTG | TTTCTGCAGGTTCTCAATGC | |
| GCTGGAGTACGTCTGGAGGAA | TCCCGAAGAGGCAGGTGTAG | |
| GGAGCCATGGATTGCACATT | GGCCCGGGAAGTCACTGT | |
| TTCTCCAAAGCACCTAGCCAA | TGTGGAAAACTAAGGGCTTGTTG | |
| AGGAAGCCGTTCTGTGACAT | TTGAAGGAGCTTTGGGAAGA | |
| GGTGGTGATTGGAGATGA | CTTTAGATTGGTTTCGTGGA | |
| ATGGTTGGTTTCAAGGCCACA | CGGTATCCAGAGGGAAAGTGAT | |
| CCTAAGGCTCCTGCCAGTAAA | AACCAGCTCCCTCACCAAGTAA | |
| GAGACCTTCAACACCCCAGC | ATGTCACGCACGATTTCCC |
FIGURE 1EGCG reduced obesity and the adipose weight in mice. (A) The body weights of mice after 20 weeks feeding; (B) Lee index; (C) ratio of subcutaneous fat weight to body weight; and (D) epididymal fat weight to body weight. Data were shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6/7 each group). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control. #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001 vs. HFD.
FIGURE 2EGCG alleviated HFD-induced hyperlipidemia in mice. (A) TAG; (B) CHOL; (C) HDL-C; and (D) LDL-C. Data were shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6/7 each group). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control. #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001 vs. HFD. § P < 0.05 vs. HFD + EGCG (50 mg/kg).
FIGURE 3Effect of EGCG on lipid excretion. (A) TAG; (B) CHOL; (C) HDL-C; (D) LDL-C; and (E) FFA. Data were shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6/7 each group). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs control. #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001 vs HFD. § P < 0.05 vs HFD + EGCG (50 mg/kg).
FIGURE 4Effect of EGCG on the expression of genes involved in lipogenesis, oxidation, and transportation in subcutaneous adipose tissues of mice. Total RNA extracted from subcutaneous white adipose tissue was used for mRNA expression analysis of genes involved in fatty acid synthesis [(A–E) acc1, fas, srebp1, scd1, and pparγ], lipolysis [(F–J) pparα, hsl, atgl, aco2, and mcad], lipid transportation and thermogenesis [(K–L) ap2, pgc1α]. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 3/4 each group). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control. #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001 vs. HFD.
FIGURE 6Effect of EGCG on the expression of proteins involved in lipogenesis, oxidation, and activation of AMPK. Lysate was prepared from subcutaneous adipose tissues and epididymal adipose tissues and subjected to Western blotting analysis to detect the expression of proteins involved in lipogenesis (FAS and ACC), oxidation (CPT1α), and activation of AMPK in (A) subcutaneous adipose tissues and (B) epididymal adipose tissues, separately. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001 between groups.
FIGURE 5Effect of EGCG on the expression of genes involved in lipogenesis, oxidation, and transportation in epididymal adipose tissues of mice. Total RNA extracted from subcutaneous white adipose tissue was used for mRNA expression analysis of genes involved in fatty acid synthesis [(A–E) acc1, fas, srebp1, scd1, and pparγ], lipolysis [(F–J) pparα, hsl, atgl, aco2, and mcad], adipocypte differentiation transportation, and thermogenesis [(K–N) c/ebpβ, ap2, ucp2, and pgc1α]. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 3–4). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control. #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001 vs. HFD.