Literature DB >> 30523985

Simulation of visual perception and learning with a retinal prosthesis.

James R Golden1, Cordelia Erickson-Davis, Nicolas P Cottaris, Nikhil Parthasarathy, Fred Rieke, David H Brainard, Brian A Wandell, E J Chichilnisky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The nature of artificial vision with a retinal prosthesis, and the degree to which the brain can adapt to the unnatural input from such a device, are poorly understood. Therefore, the development of current and future devices may be aided by theory and simulations that help to infer and understand what prosthesis patients see. APPROACH: A biologically-informed, extensible computational framework is presented here to predict visual perception and the potential effect of learning with a subretinal prosthesis. The framework relies on optimal linear reconstruction of the stimulus from retinal responses to infer the visual information available to the patient. A simulation of the physiological optics of the eye and light responses of the major retinal neurons was used to calculate the optimal linear transformation for reconstructing natural images from retinal activity. The result was then used to reconstruct the visual stimulus during the artificial activation expected from a subretinal prosthesis in a degenerated retina, as a proxy for inferred visual perception. MAIN
RESULTS: Several simple observations reveal the potential utility of such a simulation framework. The inferred perception obtained with prosthesis activation was substantially degraded compared to the inferred perception obtained with normal retinal responses, as expected given the limited resolution and lack of cell type specificity of the prosthesis. Consistent with clinical findings and the importance of cell type specificity, reconstruction using only ON cells, and not OFF cells, was substantially more accurate. Finally, when reconstruction was re-optimized for prosthesis stimulation, simulating the greatest potential for learning by the patient, the accuracy of inferred perception was much closer to that of healthy vision. SIGNIFICANCE: The reconstruction approach thus provides a more complete method for exploring the potential for treating blindness with retinal prostheses than has been available previously. It may also be useful for interpreting patient data in clinical trials, and for improving prosthesis design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30523985     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaf270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  4 in total

1.  Correlated Activity in the Degenerate Retina Inhibits Focal Response to Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Jungryul Ahn; Seongkwang Cha; Kwang-Eon Choi; Seong-Woo Kim; Yongseok Yoo; Yong Sook Goo
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.147

2.  Modeling visual performance differences 'around' the visual field: A computational observer approach.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users.

Authors:  Cordelia Erickson-Davis; Helma Korzybska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reconstruction of natural images from responses of primate retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Nora Brackbill; Colleen Rhoades; Alexandra Kling; Nishal P Shah; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.