Literature DB >> 30523712

Fixed Duration of Venetoclax-Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Eradicates Minimal Residual Disease and Prolongs Survival: Post-Treatment Follow-Up of the MURANO Phase III Study.

Arnon P Kater1, John F Seymour2, Peter Hillmen3, Barbara Eichhorst4, Anton W Langerak5, Carolyn Owen6, Maria Verdugo7, Jenny Wu8, Elizabeth A Punnoose8, Yanwen Jiang8, Jue Wang8, Michelle Boyer9, Kathryn Humphrey9, Mehrdad Mobasher8, Thomas J Kipps10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The MURANO study demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for fixed-duration venetoclax-rituximab compared with bendamustine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. With all patients off treatment, we report minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics and updated outcomes.
METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 2 years of venetoclax plus rituximab during the first six cycles, or six cycles of bendamustine-rituximab. Primary end point was PFS. Safety and peripheral blood (PB) MRD status-at cycle 4, 2 to 3 months after end of combination therapy (EOCT), and every 3 to 6 months thereafter-were secondary end points.
RESULTS: Of 194 patients, 174 (90%) completed the venetoclax-rituximab phase and 130 (67%) completed 2 years of venetoclax. With a median follow-up of 36 months, PFS and overall survival remain superior to bendamustine-rituximab (hazard ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.23]; and hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.85], respectively). Patients who received venetoclax-rituximab achieved a higher rate of PB undetectable MRD (uMRD; less than 10-4) at EOCT (62% v 13%) with superiority sustained through month 24 (end of therapy). Overall, uMRD status at EOCT predicted longer PFS. Among those with detectable MRD, low-level MRD (10-4 to less than 10-2) predicted improved PFS compared with high-level MRD (10-2 or greater). At a median of 9.9 months (range, 1.4 to 22.5 months) after completing fixed-duration venetoclax-rituximab, overall only 12% (16 of 130) of patients developed disease progression (11 high-level MRD, three low-level MRD). At the end of therapy, 70% and 98% of patients with uMRD remained in uMRD and without disease progression, respectively.
CONCLUSION: With all patients having finished treatment, continued benefit was observed for venetoclax-rituximab compared with bendamustine-rituximab. uMRD rates were durable and predicted longer PFS, which establishes the impact of PB MRD on the benefit of fixed-duration, venetoclax-containing treatment. Low conversion to detectable MRD and sustained PFS after completion of 2 years of venetoclax-rituximab demonstrate the feasibility of this regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30523712     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.01580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  73 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of New Targeted Agents in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  R Andrew Harkins; Sharvil P Patel; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 2.  Targeted Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Thomas J Kipps; Michael Y Choi
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  Venetoclax resistance and acquired BCL2 mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Eugen Tausch; William Close; Anna Dolnik; Johannes Bloehdorn; Brenda Chyla; Lars Bullinger; Hartmut Döhner; Daniel Mertens; Stephan Stilgenbauer
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Response in patients with BIRC3-mutated relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with fixed-duration venetoclax and rituximab.

Authors:  Arnon P Kater; Yanwen Jiang; Brenda Chyla; John F Seymour
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Preventing and monitoring for tumor lysis syndrome and other toxicities of venetoclax during treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Kirsten Fischer; Othman Al-Sawaf; Michael Hallek
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

6.  Treatment of relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after venetoclax.

Authors:  Meghan C Thompson; Anthony R Mato
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

Review 7.  Approaches for relapsed CLL after chemotherapy-free frontline regimens.

Authors:  Lindsey E Roeker; Anthony R Mato
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

8.  Venetoclax plus R- or G-CHOP in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from the CAVALLI phase 1b trial.

Authors:  Andrew D Zelenetz; Gilles Salles; Kylie D Mason; Carla Casulo; Steven Le Gouill; Laurie H Sehn; Herve Tilly; Guillaume Cartron; Martine E D Chamuleau; Andre Goy; Constantine S Tam; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Adam M Petrich; Arijit Sinha; Divya Samineni; Sylvia Herter; Ellen Ingalla; Edith Szafer-Glusman; Christian Klein; Deepak Sampath; Martin Kornacker; Mehrdad Mobasher; Franck Morschhauser
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  BTK inhibitor therapy is effective in patients with CLL resistant to venetoclax.

Authors:  Victor S Lin; Thomas E Lew; Sasanka M Handunnetti; Piers Blombery; Tamia Nguyen; David A Westerman; Bryone J Kuss; Constantine S Tam; Andrew W Roberts; John F Seymour; Mary Ann Anderson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Venetoclax: A Review in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.