Supriya Singh1, Jacob Reeves1, G Daniel G Langohr1, James A Johnson1, George S Athwal2. 1. Hand and Upper Limb Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. 2. Hand and Upper Limb Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: gathwal@uwo.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the subacromial balloon spacer with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Eight male cadaveric shoulders were mounted on a custom shoulder simulator that permitted quasistatic deltoid and rotator cuff muscle loading. Four shoulder conditions were tested: intact, irreparable rotator cuff tear (torn), subacromial balloon spacer, and SCR. The primary outcomes were superior humeral head migration and functional shoulder abduction force, which were measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of shoulder abduction. RESULTS: In comparison to the intact condition, the torn condition resulted in a significant increase in superior humeral head migration at 0° (P = .03) and 30° (P = .02) of abduction. Insertion of the subacromial balloon spacer restored the humeral head position such that it was not significantly different from the intact condition (P = .18). Similarly, SCR restored the humeral head position such that it was not significantly different from the intact condition (P = .99). No significant differences were found between the balloon and SCR (P = .99). The functional abduction force was significantly decreased after tear creation (P = .01); however, the subacromial balloon (P = .40) and SCR (P = .99) restored functional abduction force comparable to the intact shoulder state. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results, both techniques function to decrease superior humeral head migration and to restore more normal glenohumeral joint position and forces during various abduction positions. No substantial differences were identified between techniques at time zero. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this laboratory study indicate that the balloon and SCR both provided mechanical effects that restored the humeral head position from the superiorly migrated location. As such, similar clinical effects can be expected at time zero in patients with massive rotator cuff tears.
PURPOSE: To compare the subacromial balloon spacer with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Eight male cadaveric shoulders were mounted on a custom shoulder simulator that permitted quasistatic deltoid and rotator cuff muscle loading. Four shoulder conditions were tested: intact, irreparable rotator cuff tear (torn), subacromial balloon spacer, and SCR. The primary outcomes were superior humeral head migration and functional shoulder abduction force, which were measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of shoulder abduction. RESULTS: In comparison to the intact condition, the torn condition resulted in a significant increase in superior humeral head migration at 0° (P = .03) and 30° (P = .02) of abduction. Insertion of the subacromial balloon spacer restored the humeral head position such that it was not significantly different from the intact condition (P = .18). Similarly, SCR restored the humeral head position such that it was not significantly different from the intact condition (P = .99). No significant differences were found between the balloon and SCR (P = .99). The functional abduction force was significantly decreased after tear creation (P = .01); however, the subacromial balloon (P = .40) and SCR (P = .99) restored functional abduction force comparable to the intact shoulder state. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results, both techniques function to decrease superior humeral head migration and to restore more normal glenohumeral joint position and forces during various abduction positions. No substantial differences were identified between techniques at time zero. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this laboratory study indicate that the balloon and SCR both provided mechanical effects that restored the humeral head position from the superiorly migrated location. As such, similar clinical effects can be expected at time zero in patients with massive rotator cuff tears.
Authors: Jonathan D Hughes; Brian Davis; Emily Whicker; Gregory R Sprowls; Lindsay Barrera; Ashkan Baradaran; Soheil Sabzevari; Jeremy M Burnham; Anup A Shah; Albert Lin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.114
Authors: Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Lukas N Muench; Knut Beitzel; Cameron Kia; Elifho Obopilwe; Leo Pauzenberger; Christopher R Adams; Mark P Cote; Bastian Scheiderer; Augustus D Mazzocca Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-10-06
Authors: Clara Isabel de Campos Azevedo; Ana Catarina Leiria Pires Gago Ângelo; Carlos Quental; Sérgio Gonçalves; João Folgado; Nuno Ferreira; Nuno Sevivas Journal: JSES Int Date: 2021-03-29