Literature DB >> 30522282

Vocal emotion recognition performance predicts the quality of life in adult cochlear implant users.

Xin Luo1, Ashley Kern1, Kathryn R Pulling1.   

Abstract

Clinical tests of cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in sentence recognition cannot fully reflect CI users' self-reported quality of life (QoL). Here, vocal emotion recognition scores, speech reception thresholds (SRTs), and demographic factors were tested as predictors of QoL scores assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in postlingually deafened adult CI users. After correction for multiple comparisons, vocal emotion recognition scores were significantly correlated with QoL scores in all subdomains (social interaction, self-esteem, etc.), while SRTs and duration of CI use were not. Vocal emotion recognition may thus be used in clinic to accurately and broadly predict QoL with CIs.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30522282     DOI: 10.1121/1.5079575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.

Authors:  Deepa Suneel; Lisa S Davidson; Judith Lieu
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2019-10-07

2.  Age-Related Changes in Voice Emotion Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Perceived Anger in Clear and Conversational Speech: Contributions of Age and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shae D Morgan; Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Ashton D Crain; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  How Does Quality of Life Relate to Auditory Abilities? A Subitem Analysis of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire.

Authors:  Kara J Vasil; Jessica Lewis; Terrin Tamati; Christin Ray; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Margaret E Richter; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre to the Perception of Vocal Emotions in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Celina I von Eiff; Verena G Skuk; Romi Zäske; Christine Nussbaum; Sascha Frühholz; Ute Feuer; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Explaining Speech Recognition and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Complementary Contributions of Demographic, Sensory, and Cognitive Factors.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Skidmore; Kara J Vasil; Shuman He; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.619

8.  Acoustics of Emotional Prosody Produced by Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni; Rizwan M Siddiqui; Julie A Christensen; Mohsen Hozan; Jenni L Sis; Sara A Damm
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-30

9.  Development of vocal emotion recognition in school-age children: The EmoHI test for hearing-impaired populations.

Authors:  Leanne Nagels; Etienne Gaudrain; Deborah Vickers; Marta Matos Lopes; Petra Hendriks; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Effects of Increasing the Overall Level or Fitting Hearing Aids on Emotional Responses to Sounds.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Lori Rakita; Gabrielle H Buono; Travis M Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.