Jennifer Acosta1, Christopher Graves2, Elizabeth Spranger3, Jacob Kurlander4, Anne E Sales5, Geoffrey D Barnes6. 1. Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine. 2. Frankel Cardiovascular Center. 3. Performance Improvement, Department of Internal Medicine. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health Care System, Mich. 5. Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. 6. Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine; Frankel Cardiovascular Center. Electronic address: gbarnes@umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Periprocedural antithrombotic medication management is a complex, often confusing process for patients and their providers. Communication difficulties often lead to suboptimal medication management, resulting in delayed or canceled procedures. METHODS: We conducted telephone surveys with patients taking chronic antithrombotic medications who had recently undergone an endoscopy procedure. In the survey, we sought to better understand the periprocedural process for patients taking antithrombotic medications. We conducted a content analysis of patients' unstructured responses from the periprocedural patient phone calls. We used a multistep group coding process to analyze responses. Relationships between different themes and categories were analyzed using original quotes and retrieving thematic segments from the transcripts. RESULTS: The survey was administered to 81 patients; 74/81 respondents (91%) said they understood the plan to manage their antithrombotics, but 21/81 respondents (26%) were not completely satisfied with the coordination, communication, and management of their medications. Five primary themes emerged from the content analysis as patient-centered design features affecting periprocedural care: (1) patients require accurate and timely information; (2) a patient's prior experience with antithrombotic therapy affects their understanding of the process; (3) patients prefer receiving their information from a single source, and (4) also prefer different methods of instruction; (5) finally, patients expect their clinician(s) to be available through the periprocedural management process. CONCLUSION: To optimize the periprocedural medication management communication process, patients desire timeliness, accuracy, and adaptiveness to prior patient experience while offering a single, consistently available point of contact.
BACKGROUND: Periprocedural antithrombotic medication management is a complex, often confusing process for patients and their providers. Communication difficulties often lead to suboptimal medication management, resulting in delayed or canceled procedures. METHODS: We conducted telephone surveys with patients taking chronic antithrombotic medications who had recently undergone an endoscopy procedure. In the survey, we sought to better understand the periprocedural process for patients taking antithrombotic medications. We conducted a content analysis of patients' unstructured responses from the periprocedural patient phone calls. We used a multistep group coding process to analyze responses. Relationships between different themes and categories were analyzed using original quotes and retrieving thematic segments from the transcripts. RESULTS: The survey was administered to 81 patients; 74/81 respondents (91%) said they understood the plan to manage their antithrombotics, but 21/81 respondents (26%) were not completely satisfied with the coordination, communication, and management of their medications. Five primary themes emerged from the content analysis as patient-centered design features affecting periprocedural care: (1) patients require accurate and timely information; (2) a patient's prior experience with antithrombotic therapy affects their understanding of the process; (3) patients prefer receiving their information from a single source, and (4) also prefer different methods of instruction; (5) finally, patients expect their clinician(s) to be available through the periprocedural management process. CONCLUSION: To optimize the periprocedural medication management communication process, patients desire timeliness, accuracy, and adaptiveness to prior patient experience while offering a single, consistently available point of contact.
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Stefano Benussi; Dipak Kotecha; Anders Ahlsson; Dan Atar; Barbara Casadei; Manuel Castella; Hans-Christoph Diener; Hein Heidbuchel; Jeroen Hendriks; Gerhard Hindricks; Antonis S Manolis; Jonas Oldgren; Bogdan Alexandru Popescu; Ulrich Schotten; Bart Van Putte; Panagiotis Vardas Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Nathan P Clark; Daniel M Witt; Loren E Davies; Edward M Saito; Kathleen H McCool; James D Douketis; Kelli R Metz; Thomas Delate Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Dean Schillinger; Edward L Machtinger; Frances Wang; Jorge Palacios; Maytrella Rodriguez; Andrew Bindman Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2006 Oct-Nov
Authors: Csilla Kalocsai; Andre Amaral; Dominique Piquette; Grace Walter; Shelly P Dev; Paul Taylor; James Downar; Lesley Gotlib Conn Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Signe A Flottorp; Andrew D Oxman; Jane Krause; Nyokabi R Musila; Michel Wensing; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Richard Baker; Martin P Eccles Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Geoffrey D Barnes; Elizabeth Spranger; Emily Sippola; Elizabeth Renner; Allison Ruff; Anne E Sales; Jacob E Kurlander Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-02-05
Authors: Henry Han; Grace Chung; Emily Sippola; Wilson Chen; Spencer Morgan; Elizabeth Renner; Allison Ruff; Anne Sales; Jacob Kurlander; Geoffrey D Barnes Journal: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Date: 2021-07-16