Literature DB >> 30521763

Geospatial Analysis of Birth Records to Target Programming for Mothers With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Michigan, 2013.

Elizabeth MacQuillan1, Amy Curtis2, Kathleen Baker2, Rajib Paul2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the United States has increased during the past several decades. The objective of this study was to use birth records and a combination of statistical and geographic information system (GIS) analyses to evaluate GDM rates among subgroups of pregnant women in Michigan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained data on maternal demographic and health-related characteristics and regions of residence from 2013 Michigan birth records. We geocoded (ie, matched to maternal residence) the birth data, calculated proportions of births to women with GDM, and used logistic regression models to determine predictors of GDM. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from the exponentiated beta statistic of the logistic regression test. We also used kernel density estimations and local indicators of spatial association (LISA) analyses to determine GDM rates in regions in the state and identify GDM hot spots (ie, areas with a high GDM rate surrounded by areas with a high GDM rate).
RESULTS: We successfully geocoded 104 419 of 109 168 (95.6%) births in Michigan in 2013. Of the geocoded births, 5185 (5.0%) were to mothers diagnosed with GDM. LISA maps showed a hot spot of 8 adjacent counties with high GDM rates in southwest Michigan. Of 11 064 births in the Southwest region, 829 (7.5%) were to mothers diagnosed with GDM, the highest rate in the state and a result confirmed by geospatial analyses. PRACTICE APPLICATIONS: Birth data and GIS analyses may be used to measure statewide pregnancy-associated disease risk and identify populations and geographic regions in need of targeted public health and maternal-child health interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GDM; diabetes; geographic information systems; mapping; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30521763      PMCID: PMC6304727          DOI: 10.1177/0033354918815183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  18 in total

1.  Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: promoting and supporting breastfeeding.

Authors:  Rachelle Lessen; Katherine Kavanagh
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 2.  The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kelly J Hunt; Kelly L Schuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Improved birth weight for Black infants: outcomes of a Healthy Start program.

Authors:  Catherine L Kothari; Ruth Zielinski; Arthur James; Remitha M Charoth; Luz del Carmen Sweezy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Density estimation and adaptive bandwidths: a primer for public health practitioners.

Authors:  Heather A Carlos; Xun Shi; James Sargent; Susanne Tanski; Ethan M Berke
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 6.  Obesity, gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Yariv Yogev; Gerard H A Visser
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years.

Authors:  Sarah Partridge; Jacques Balayla; Christina A Holcroft; Haim A Abenhaim
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Population Attributable Risk Fractions of Maternal Overweight and Obesity for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Natasha MacInnis; Christy G Woolcott; Sarah McDonald; Stefan Kuhle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Quantification of the type 2 diabetes risk in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95,750 women.

Authors:  Girish Rayanagoudar; Amal A Hashi; Javier Zamora; Khalid S Khan; Graham A Hitman; Shakila Thangaratinam
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Prevalence estimates of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007-2010.

Authors:  Carla L DeSisto; Shin Y Kim; Andrea J Sharma
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.