Literature DB >> 30521673

Inhaled steroids with and without regular salmeterol for asthma: serious adverse events.

Christopher J Cates1, Stefanie Schmidt, Montse Ferrer, Ben Sayer, Samuel Waterson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological evidence has suggested a link between use of beta₂-agonists and increased asthma mortality. Much debate has surrounded possible causal links for this association, and whether regular (daily) long-acting beta₂-agonists (LABAs) are safe, particularly when used in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). This is an update of a Cochrane Review that now includes data from two large trials including 11,679 adults and 6208 children; both were mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 
OBJECTIVES: To assess risks of mortality and non-fatal serious adverse events (SAEs) in trials that randomised participants with chronic asthma to regular salmeterol and ICS versus the same dose of ICS. SEARCH
METHODS: We identified randomised trials using the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials. We checked websites of clinical trials registers for unpublished trial data. We also checked FDA submissions in relation to salmeterol. The date of the most recent search was 10 October 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included parallel-design randomised trials involving adults, children, or both with asthma of any severity who were randomised to treatment with regular salmeterol and ICS (in separate or combined inhalers) versus the same dose of ICS of at least 12 weeks in duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We conducted the review according to standard procedures expected by Cochrane. We obtained unpublished data on mortality and SAEs from the sponsors, from ClinicalTrials.gov, and from FDA submissions. We assessed our confidence in the evidence according to current GRADE recommendations. MAIN
RESULTS: We have included in this review 41 studies (27,951 participants) in adults and adolescents, along with eight studies (8453 participants) in children. We judged that the overall risk of bias was low for all-cause events, and we obtained data on SAEs from all study authors. All except 542 adults (and none of the children) were given salmeterol and fluticasone in the same (combination) inhaler.DeathsEleven of a total of 14,233 adults taking regular salmeterol and ICS died, as did 13 of 13,718 taking regular ICS at the same dose. The pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) was 0.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 1.78; participants = 27,951; studies = 41; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). In other words, for every 1000 adults treated for 25 weeks, one death occurred among those on ICS alone, and the corresponding risk among those taking salmeterol and ICS was also one death (95% CI 0 to 2 deaths).No children died, and no adults or children died of asthma, so we remain uncertain about mortality in children and about asthma mortality in any age group.Non-fatal serious adverse eventsA total of 332 adults receiving regular salmeterol with ICS experienced a non-fatal SAE of any cause, compared to 282 adults receiving regular ICS. The pooled Peto OR was 1.14 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.33; participants = 27,951; studies = 41; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). For every 1000 adults treated for 25 weeks, 21 adults on ICS alone had an SAE, and the corresponding risk for those on salmeterol and ICS was 23 adults (95% CI 20 to 27).Sixty-five of 4229 children given regular salmeterol with ICS suffered an SAE of any cause, compared to 62 of 4224 children given regular ICS. The pooled Peto OR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.48; participants = 8453; studies = 8; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). For every 1000 children treated for 23 weeks, 15 children on ICS alone had an SAE, and the corresponding risk for those on salmeterol and ICS was 15 children (95% CI 11 to 22).Asthma-related serious adverse eventsEighty and 67 adults in each group, respectively, experienced an asthma-related non-fatal SAE. The pooled Peto OR was 1.15 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.59; participants = 27,951; studies = 41; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence). For every 1000 adults treated for 25 weeks, five receiving ICS alone had an asthma-related SAE, and the corresponding risk among those on salmeterol and ICS was six adults (95% CI 4 to 8).Twenty-nine children taking salmeterol and ICS and 23 children taking ICS alone reported asthma-related events. The pooled Peto OR was 1.25 (95% CI 0.72 to 2.16; participants = 8453; studies = 8; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). For every 1000 children treated for 23 weeks, five receiving an ICS alone had an asthma-related SAE, and the corresponding risk among those receiving salmeterol and ICS was seven children (95% CI 4 to 12). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a difference in the risk of death or serious adverse events in either adults or children. However, trial authors reported no asthma deaths among 27,951 adults or 8453 children randomised to regular salmeterol and ICS or ICS alone over an average of six months. Therefore, the risk of dying from asthma on either treatment was very low, but we remain uncertain about whether the risk of dying from asthma is altered by adding salmeterol to ICS.Inclusion of new trials has increased the precision of the estimates for non-fatal SAEs of any cause. We can now say that the worst-case estimate is that at least 152 adults and 139 children must be treated with combination salmeterol and ICS for six months for one additional person to be admitted to the hospital (compared to treatment with ICS alone). These possible risks still have to be weighed against the benefits experienced by people who take combination treatment.However more than 90% of prescribed treatment was taken in the new trials, so the effects observed may be different from those seen with salmeterol in combination with ICS in daily practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30521673      PMCID: PMC6524619          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006922.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  159 in total

1.  [Is guideline-defined asthma control achievable?--secondary publication. The Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL (GOAL) Study].

Authors:  Søren Erik Pedersen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2005-09-19

2.  Cost-effectiveness of asthma control: an economic appraisal of the GOAL study.

Authors:  A H Briggs; J Bousquet; M V Wallace; W W Busse; T J H Clark; S E Pedersen; E D Bateman
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 13.146

3.  Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg) administered via combination Diskus inhaler: as effective as when given via separate Diskus inhalers.

Authors:  K R Chapman; N Ringdal; V Backer; M Palmqvist; S Saarelainen; M Briggs
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.409

4.  Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma.

Authors:  D S Pearlman; W Stricker; S Weinstein; G Gross; P Chervinsky; A Woodring; B Prillaman; T Shah
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.347

5.  Concurrent use of salmeterol with inhaled corticosteroids is more effective than inhaled corticosteroid dose increases.

Authors:  J J Murray; N L Church; W H Anderson; D I Bernstein; S E Wenzel; A Emmett; K A Rickard
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.587

6.  Montelukast and fluticasone compared with salmeterol and fluticasone in protecting against asthma exacerbation in adults: one year, double blind, randomised, comparative trial.

Authors:  Leif Bjermer; Hans Bisgaard; Jean Bousquet; Leonardo M Fabbri; Andrew P Greening; Tari Haahtela; Stephen T Holgate; Cesar Picado; Joris Menten; S Balachandra Dass; Jonathan A Leff; Peter G Polos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-18

7.  Efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol administered twice daily via hydrofluoroalkane 134a metered-dose inhaler in adolescent and adult patients with persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study.

Authors:  Robert A Nathan; Anthony Rooklin; Lynne Schoaf; Catherine Scott; Anna Ellsworth; Karen House; Paul Dorinsky
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 8.  Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.

Authors:  Christopher J Cates; Matthew J Cates; Toby J Lasserson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

9.  Hypokalemia from beta2-receptor stimulation by circulating epinephrine.

Authors:  M J Brown; D C Brown; M B Murphy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Short-term safety and tolerability of double-dose salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in adult asthmatic patients.

Authors:  Lars-Erik Adolfsson; Michael Lundgren; Bjorn Tilling; Sverker Jern; Christina Tyren; Alex Godwood; Dee Gor
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.

Authors:  Orlagh O'Shea; Elizabeth Stovold; Christopher J Cates
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-14

2.  Inhaled steroids with and without regular formoterol for asthma: serious adverse events.

Authors:  Sadia Janjua; Stefanie Schmidt; Montse Ferrer; Christopher J Cates
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-25

3.  Neuropsychiatric side reactions of leukotriene receptor antagonist, antihistamine, and inhaled corticosteroid: A real-world analysis of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Authors:  Sainan Bian; Lisha Li; Zixi Wang; Le Cui; Yingyang Xu; Kai Guan; Bin Zhao; Lianglu Wang; Jia Yin
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.084

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.